Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Colorectal Cancer

Is Fecal Diversion Needed in Pelvic Anastomoses During Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)?

Authors: Matthew D. Whealon, MD, John V. Gahagan, MD, Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, MD, Michael P. O’Leary, MD, Matthew Selleck, DO, Sinziana Dumitra, MD, Byrne Lee, MD, Maheswari Senthil, MD, Alessio Pigazzi, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The role of fecal diversion with pelvic anastomosis during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is not well defined.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC between 2009 and 2016 was performed to identify those with a pelvic anastomosis (colorectal, ileorectal, or coloanal anastomosis).

Results

The study identified 73 patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC at three different institutions between July 2009 and June of 2016. Of these patients, 32 (44%) underwent a primary anastomosis with a diverting ileostomy, whereas 41 (56%) underwent a primary anastomosis without fecal diversion. The anastomotic leak rate for the no-diversion group was 22% compared with 0% for the group with a diverting ileostomy (p < 0.01). The 90-day mortality rate for the no-diversion group was 7.1%. The hospital stay was 14.1 ± 8.0 days in the diversion group compared with 17.9 ± 12.5 days in the no-diversion group (p = 0.12). Of those patients with a diverting ileostomy, 68% (n = 22) had their bowel continuity restored, 18% of which required a laparotomy for reversal. Postoperative complications occurred for 50% of those who required a laparotomy and for 44% of those who did not require a laparotomy (p = 0.84).

Conclusion

Diverting ileostomies in patients with a pelvic anastomosis undergoing CRS and HIPEC are associated with a significantly reduced anastomotic leak rate. Reversal of the diverting ileostomy in this patient population required a laparotomy in 18% of the cases and had an associated morbidity rate of 50%.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. ACS. 1997;185:105–13. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00018-5. Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. ACS. 1997;185:105–13. doi:10.​1016/​S1072-7515(97)00018-5.
3.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202:259–64. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.11.014.CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202:259–64. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjsurg.​2010.​11.​014.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG), Köckerling F, Rose J, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Surg Endosc. 2014;13:639–44. doi:10.1007/s004649901064. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG), Köckerling F, Rose J, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Surg Endosc. 2014;13:639–44. doi:10.​1007/​s004649901064.
11.
13.
go back to reference Younan R, Kusamura S, Baratti D, et al. Bowel complications in 203 cases of peritoneal surface malignancies treated with peritonectomy and closed-technique intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:910–18. doi:10.1245/ASO.2005.11.030.CrossRefPubMed Younan R, Kusamura S, Baratti D, et al. Bowel complications in 203 cases of peritoneal surface malignancies treated with peritonectomy and closed-technique intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:910–18. doi:10.​1245/​ASO.​2005.​11.​030.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chua TC, Yan TD, Saxena A, Morris DL. Should the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy still be regarded as a highly morbid procedure? Ann Surg. 2009;249:900–7. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a45d86.CrossRefPubMed Chua TC, Yan TD, Saxena A, Morris DL. Should the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy still be regarded as a highly morbid procedure? Ann Surg. 2009;249:900–7. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181a45d86​.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:719–20. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816a74b5.CrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:719–20. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e31816a74b5​.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1562–7.PubMed Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1562–7.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Mark K, Uranitsch S, Pedross F, et al. Colon/rectum diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Surgery. 2016;159:1129–39. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.006 CrossRef Mark K, Uranitsch S, Pedross F, et al. Colon/rectum diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Surgery. 2016;159:1129–39. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2015.​11.​006 CrossRef
27.
29.
go back to reference Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients. ACS. 2015;220:186–94. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.017. Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients. ACS. 2015;220:186–94. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2014.​10.​017.
30.
go back to reference Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Wu T, Eberle BM, Belzberg H, Demetriades D. Crystalloids after primary colon resection and anastomosis at initial trauma laparotomy: excessive volumes are associated with anastomotic leakage. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. 2011;70:603–10. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182092abb.CrossRef Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Wu T, Eberle BM, Belzberg H, Demetriades D. Crystalloids after primary colon resection and anastomosis at initial trauma laparotomy: excessive volumes are associated with anastomotic leakage. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. 2011;70:603–10. doi:10.​1097/​TA.​0b013e3182092abb​.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Boesen AK, Maeda Y, Madsen MR. Perioperative fluid infusion and its influence on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: implications for prevention strategies. Colorectal Dis. 2013:15:e522. doi:10.1111/codi.12321 PubMed Boesen AK, Maeda Y, Madsen MR. Perioperative fluid infusion and its influence on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: implications for prevention strategies. Colorectal Dis. 2013:15:e522. doi:10.​1111/​codi.​12321 PubMed
32.
go back to reference Waterland P, Goonetilleke K, Naumann DN, Sutcliff M, Soliman F. Defunctioning ileostomy reversal rates and reasons for delayed reversal: does delay impact on complications of ileostomy reversal? A study of 170 defunctioning ileostomies. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7:685–9. doi:10.14740/jocmr2150w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Waterland P, Goonetilleke K, Naumann DN, Sutcliff M, Soliman F. Defunctioning ileostomy reversal rates and reasons for delayed reversal: does delay impact on complications of ileostomy reversal? A study of 170 defunctioning ileostomies. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7:685–9. doi:10.​14740/​jocmr2150w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Çubukçu A, Alponat A, Gönüllü NN, Özkan S, Erçin C. An experimental study evaluating the effect of mitomycin C on the prevention of postoperative intraabdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2001;96:163–6. doi:10.1006/jsre.2000.6059.CrossRefPubMed Çubukçu A, Alponat A, Gönüllü NN, Özkan S, Erçin C. An experimental study evaluating the effect of mitomycin C on the prevention of postoperative intraabdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2001;96:163–6. doi:10.​1006/​jsre.​2000.​6059.CrossRefPubMed
38.
39.
go back to reference Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Abdominal adhesions causing intestinal obstruction following cytoreductive surgery and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Acta Chir Austriaca. 1995;27:92–5.CrossRef Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Abdominal adhesions causing intestinal obstruction following cytoreductive surgery and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Acta Chir Austriaca. 1995;27:92–5.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Markman M, Cleary S, Howell SB. Complications of extensive adhesion formation after intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;162(5):445–8.PubMed Markman M, Cleary S, Howell SB. Complications of extensive adhesion formation after intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;162(5):445–8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Is Fecal Diversion Needed in Pelvic Anastomoses During Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)?
Authors
Matthew D. Whealon, MD
John V. Gahagan, MD
Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, MD
Michael P. O’Leary, MD
Matthew Selleck, DO
Sinziana Dumitra, MD
Byrne Lee, MD
Maheswari Senthil, MD
Alessio Pigazzi, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5853-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2017 Go to the issue