Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2019

01-10-2019 | Mastectomy | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Routine Radiologic Staging of Distant Metastases Must Be Recommended as a Binding Guideline After Diagnosis of Local Breast Cancer Recurrence

Author: Uwe Güth, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

The motivation for this study1 arose from a particular experience at the authors’ Breast Center network during the last year. In two cases of local recurrence (LR), the interdisciplinary tumor board recommended staging of distant metastases (DMs) followed by a surgical intervention (after the DMs were excluded). However, the surgeons responsible for the cases first performed the operation (mastectomy) and postponed staging of the DMs to the postoperative period. In both cases, however, DMs were found. Retrospectively, it must be questioned whether these mastectomies were justified. Strictly speaking, the preoperative informed consent was invalid because patient and doctor assumed a curative approach, which was not indicated. Both doctors responsible for this management were experienced breast surgeons. Why did they omit radiologic staging procedures before surgery? Obviously, they underestimated the actual risk of DMs, which is understandable because most of the international breast cancer guidelines omit the management of LR. The few guidelines that included recommendations regarding LR and advocated radiologic staging of DM once LR is diagnosed do not substantiate their opinion with citable references from the literature.2,3 Why? Some publications report data regarding a synchronous diagnosis of LR and DM, but this is not the main topic of these publications. Moreover, it is difficult and time-consuming to find the few relevant publications (PubMed lists nearly 3000 entries for the search for “breast cancer” and “local recurrence”). Until recently, no publications addressed this question explicitly but focused instead on the frequency of a concurrent diagnosis of LR and DM. Neuman et al.4 were the first to address the question. Their analysis, however, was restricted to patients with advanced stages of cancer at the initial diagnosis. The current study analyzed the metastatic patterns of patients with LR in an unselected cohort that included different types of previous surgery and all non-metastatic stages of cancer at diagnosis (n = 137). …
Literature
4.
go back to reference Neuman HB, Schumacher JR, Francescatti AB, et al. For the Alliance/American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program Cancer Care Delivery Research Breast Cancer Surveillance Working Group. Risk of synchronous distant recurrence at time of locoregional recurrence in patients with stage II and III breast cancer (AFT-01). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:975–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Neuman HB, Schumacher JR, Francescatti AB, et al. For the Alliance/American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program Cancer Care Delivery Research Breast Cancer Surveillance Working Group. Risk of synchronous distant recurrence at time of locoregional recurrence in patients with stage II and III breast cancer (AFT-01). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:975–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Güth U, Vetter M, Huang DJ, et al. Staging for distant metastases in operable breast cancer: a suggested expansion of the ESMO guideline recommendations for staging imaging of node-negative, hormonal receptor negative disease. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:555–7.CrossRefPubMed Güth U, Vetter M, Huang DJ, et al. Staging for distant metastases in operable breast cancer: a suggested expansion of the ESMO guideline recommendations for staging imaging of node-negative, hormonal receptor negative disease. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:555–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Routine Radiologic Staging of Distant Metastases Must Be Recommended as a Binding Guideline After Diagnosis of Local Breast Cancer Recurrence
Author
Uwe Güth, MD
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07610-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2019 Go to the issue

Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Requiem for Robotic Cancer Surgery? Not So Fast