Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2019

01-12-2019 | Care | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Better Understanding of What We Have Learned from Cancer Care Quality Metrics

Author: Lawrence N. Shulman, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

Prior to 2000, there were very few metrics that analyzed the quality of cancer care in the USA. We assumed that the quality of cancer care delivered in the USA was excellent, but there were little data to support this. Recently, it has been shown that cancer outcomes in the USA are quite variable across hospital types, though the reasons for this are poorly understood.1,2 Eventually, we acknowledged that, without measurement, you could neither evaluate quality nor improve performance. In the early 2000s, the Commission on Cancer began to institute cancer care quality metrics derived from the National Cancer Data Base and return the results to all of its accredited cancer programs.3
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shulman LN, Palis BE, McCabe R, Mallin K, Loomis A, Winchester D, McKellar D. Survival as a quality metric of cancer care: use of the National Cancer Data Base to assess hospital performance. J Oncol Pract 2018;14(1):e59–72.CrossRef Shulman LN, Palis BE, McCabe R, Mallin K, Loomis A, Winchester D, McKellar D. Survival as a quality metric of cancer care: use of the National Cancer Data Base to assess hospital performance. J Oncol Pract 2018;14(1):e59–72.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pfister DG, Rubin DM, Elkin EB, Neill US, Duck E, Radzyner M, Bach PB. Risk adjusting survival outcomes in hospitals that treat patients with cancer without information on cancer stage. JAMA Oncol 2015;1(9):1303–10.CrossRef Pfister DG, Rubin DM, Elkin EB, Neill US, Duck E, Radzyner M, Bach PB. Risk adjusting survival outcomes in hospitals that treat patients with cancer without information on cancer stage. JAMA Oncol 2015;1(9):1303–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 2006;244(4):602–10.PubMedPubMedCentral Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 2006;244(4):602–10.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Shulman LN, Browner AE, Palis BE, Mallin K, Kakade S, Carp N, McCabe R, Winchester D, Wong SL, McKellar DP. Compliance with cancer quality measures over time and their association with survival outcomes: the Commission on Cancer’s experience with the quality measure requiring at least 12 regional lymph nodes to be removed and analyzed with colon cancer resections. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1613–21.CrossRef Shulman LN, Browner AE, Palis BE, Mallin K, Kakade S, Carp N, McCabe R, Winchester D, Wong SL, McKellar DP. Compliance with cancer quality measures over time and their association with survival outcomes: the Commission on Cancer’s experience with the quality measure requiring at least 12 regional lymph nodes to be removed and analyzed with colon cancer resections. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1613–21.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Better Understanding of What We Have Learned from Cancer Care Quality Metrics
Author
Lawrence N. Shulman, MD
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07524-3

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2019 Go to the issue

Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Global Surgical Oncology Efforts Using a Common Language