Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Gastrectomy | Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Trends in Volume–Outcome Relationship in Gastrectomies in Texas

Authors: Naruhiko Ikoma, MD, MS, Bumyang Kim, PhD, Linda S. Elting, DrPH, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, PhD, Brian D. Badgwell, MD, MS, Paul Mansfield, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We previously reported a significant volume–outcome relationship in mortality rates after gastrectomies for gastric cancer patients in Texas (1999–2001). We aimed to identify whether changes in the volume distribution of gastrectomies occurred, whether volume–outcome relationships persisted, and potential changes in the factors influencing volume–outcome relationships.

Methods

We performed a population-based study using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File between 2010 and 2015. Hospitals were classified as high-volume centers (HVCs, > 15 cases per year), intermediate-volume centers (IVCs, 3–15 cases per year), and low-volume centers (LVCs, < 3 cases per year). We conducted multivariate analyses to evaluate factors associated with inpatient mortality and adverse events.

Results

We identified 2733 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy at 193 hospitals. Fewer hospitals performed gastrectomy than previously (193 vs. 214). There were more HVCs (5 vs. 2) and LVCs (142 vs. 134), but fewer IVCs (46 vs. 78). The proportion of patients who underwent gastrectomy at HVCs and LVCs increased, while the proportion at IVCs decreased. HVCs maintained lower in-hospital mortality rates than IVCs or LVCs, although mortality rates decreased in both LVCs and IVCs. In adjusted multivariate analyses, treatment at HVCs remained a strong predictor for lower rates of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, p = 0.019) and adverse events (OR 0.56, p = 0.013).

Conclusion

Despite improvements, patient morbidity and mortality at LVCs and IVCs remain higher than at HVCs, demonstrating that volume–outcome relationships still exist for gastrectomy and that opportunities for improvement remain.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995;221(1):43–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995;221(1):43–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135(6):569–75.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135(6):569–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Learn PA, Bach PB. A decade of mortality reductions in major oncologic surgery: the impact of centralization and quality improvement. Med Care. 2010;48(12):1041–9.CrossRefPubMed Learn PA, Bach PB. A decade of mortality reductions in major oncologic surgery: the impact of centralization and quality improvement. Med Care. 2010;48(12):1041–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dikken JL, Dassen AE, Lemmens VE, et al. Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(7):1004–13.CrossRefPubMed Dikken JL, Dassen AE, Lemmens VE, et al. Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(7):1004–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Enzinger PC, Benedetti JK, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):426–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Enzinger PC, Benedetti JK, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):426–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference van der Geest LG, van Rijssen LB, Molenaar IQ, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(4):317–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van der Geest LG, van Rijssen LB, Molenaar IQ, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(4):317–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):721–5 (discussion 726). Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):721–5 (discussion 726).
9.
go back to reference Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747–51.CrossRefPubMed Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747–51.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Simone JV, editors. Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. Hewitt M, Simone JV, editors. Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
11.
12.
go back to reference Milstein A, Galvin RS, Delbanco SF, Salber P, Buck CR Jr. Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3(6):313–6.PubMed Milstein A, Galvin RS, Delbanco SF, Salber P, Buck CR Jr. Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3(6):313–6.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Smith DL, Elting LS, Learn PA, Raut CP, Mansfield PF. Factors influencing the volume-outcome relationship in gastrectomies: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(6):1846–52.CrossRefPubMed Smith DL, Elting LS, Learn PA, Raut CP, Mansfield PF. Factors influencing the volume-outcome relationship in gastrectomies: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(6):1846–52.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med Care. 1994;32(7):700–15.CrossRefPubMed Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med Care. 1994;32(7):700–15.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rosen AK, Geraci JM, Ash AS, McNiff KJ, Moskowitz MA. Postoperative adverse events of common surgical procedures in the Medicare population. Med Care. 1992;30(9):753–65.CrossRefPubMed Rosen AK, Geraci JM, Ash AS, McNiff KJ, Moskowitz MA. Postoperative adverse events of common surgical procedures in the Medicare population. Med Care. 1992;30(9):753–65.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference McCarthy EP, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, et al. Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications? Med Care. 2000;38(8):868–76.CrossRefPubMed McCarthy EP, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, et al. Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications? Med Care. 2000;38(8):868–76.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care. 2000;38(8):785–95. Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care. 2000;38(8):785–95.
20.
go back to reference Romano PS, Chan BK, Schembri ME, Rainwater JA. Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals? Med Care. 2002;40(10):856–67.CrossRefPubMed Romano PS, Chan BK, Schembri ME, Rainwater JA. Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals? Med Care. 2002;40(10):856–67.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: a follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):472–83.PubMed Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: a follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):472–83.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Lucas FL, Wennberg DE. Potential benefits of regionalizing major surgery in Medicare patients. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2(6):277–83.PubMed Birkmeyer JD, Lucas FL, Wennberg DE. Potential benefits of regionalizing major surgery in Medicare patients. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2(6):277–83.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD. Should we regionalize major surgery? Potential benefits and policy considerations. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2000;190(3):341–9.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD. Should we regionalize major surgery? Potential benefits and policy considerations. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2000;190(3):341–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000;283(9):1159–66.CrossRefPubMed Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000;283(9):1159–66.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF Jr. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37(2):204–9.CrossRefPubMed Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF Jr. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37(2):204–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL, Starkey RB, Meropol NJ. Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4671–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL, Starkey RB, Meropol NJ. Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4671–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Modrall JG, Minter RM, Minhajuddin A, et al. The Surgeon Volume-outcome Relationship: Not Yet Ready for Policy. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):863–7.CrossRefPubMed Modrall JG, Minter RM, Minhajuddin A, et al. The Surgeon Volume-outcome Relationship: Not Yet Ready for Policy. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):863–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg. 2012;99(3):404–10.CrossRefPubMed de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg. 2012;99(3):404–10.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gooiker GA, Lemmens VE, Besselink MG, et al. Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival. Br J Surg. 2014;101(8):1000–05.CrossRefPubMed Gooiker GA, Lemmens VE, Besselink MG, et al. Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival. Br J Surg. 2014;101(8):1000–05.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gouma DJ, De Wit LT, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Van Gulik TH, Obertop H. Hospital experience and hospital mortality following partial pancreaticoduodenectomy in The Netherlands [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997;141(36):1738–41.PubMed Gouma DJ, De Wit LT, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Van Gulik TH, Obertop H. Hospital experience and hospital mortality following partial pancreaticoduodenectomy in The Netherlands [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997;141(36):1738–41.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Busweiler LAD, Dikken JL, Henneman D, et al. The influence of a composite hospital volume on outcomes for gastric cancer surgery: a Dutch population-based study. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(6):738–45.CrossRefPubMed Busweiler LAD, Dikken JL, Henneman D, et al. The influence of a composite hospital volume on outcomes for gastric cancer surgery: a Dutch population-based study. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(6):738–45.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Vicente D, Ikoma N, Chiang YJ, et al. Preoperative therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma is protective for poor oncologic outcomes in patients with complications after gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(9):2720–30.CrossRefPubMed Vicente D, Ikoma N, Chiang YJ, et al. Preoperative therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma is protective for poor oncologic outcomes in patients with complications after gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(9):2720–30.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Trends in Volume–Outcome Relationship in Gastrectomies in Texas
Authors
Naruhiko Ikoma, MD, MS
Bumyang Kim, PhD
Linda S. Elting, DrPH
Ya-Chen Tina Shih, PhD
Brian D. Badgwell, MD, MS
Paul Mansfield, MD
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07446-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019 Go to the issue