Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019

Open Access 01-06-2019 | Soft Tissue Sarcoma | Sarcoma

Defining Tumor Rupture in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Authors: Toshirou Nishida, MD, PhD, FACS, Toto Hølmebakk, MD, Chandrajit P. Raut, MD, Msc, Piotr Rutkowski, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Tumor rupture is an important risk factor predictive of recurrence after macroscopically complete resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and an indication for defined interval or even lifelong adjuvant therapy with imatinib according to guidelines. However, there is no consensus or universally accepted definition of the term ‘tumor rupture’, and, consequently, its incidence varies greatly across reported series. Without predefined criteria, the clinical significance of rupture has also been difficult to assess on multivariate analysis of retrospective data. We reviewed the relevant literature and international guidelines, and, based on the Oslo criteria, proposed the following six definitions for ‘tumor rupture’: (1) tumor fracture or spillage; (2) blood-stained ascites; (3) gastrointestinal perforation at the tumor site; (4) microscopic infiltration of an adjacent organ; (5) intralesional dissection or piecemeal resection; or (6) incisional biopsy. Not all minor defects of tumor integrity should not be classified as rupture, i.e. mucosal defects or spillage contained within the gastrointestinal lumen, microscopic tumor penetration of the peritoneum or iatrogenic damage only to the peritoneal lining, uncomplicated transperitoneal needle biopsy, and R1 resection. This broad definition identifies GIST patients at particularly high risk of recurrence in population-based cohorts; however, its applicability in other sarcomas has not been investigated. As the proposed definition of tumor rupture in GIST has limited evidence based on the small number of patients with rupture in each retrospective study, we recommend validating the proposed definition of tumor rupture in GIST in prospective studies and considering it in clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Casali PG, Abecassis N, Bauer S, et al. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29 Suppl 4:iv51–iv67.CrossRefPubMed Casali PG, Abecassis N, Bauer S, et al. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29 Suppl 4:iv51–iv67.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wittekind C, Compton CC, Greene FL, Sobin LH. TNM residual tumor classification revisited. Cancer 2002; 94: 2511–16.CrossRefPubMed Wittekind C, Compton CC, Greene FL, Sobin LH. TNM residual tumor classification revisited. Cancer 2002; 94: 2511–16.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 153: 106–20. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 153: 106–20.
4.
go back to reference Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, eds. TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC). 8th ed. Wiley: Oxford; 2017. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, eds. TNM classification of malignant tumors (UICC). 8th ed. Wiley: Oxford; 2017.
5.
go back to reference Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459–65.CrossRefPubMed Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459–65.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:70–83.CrossRefPubMed Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:70–83.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gold JS, Gönen M, Gutiérrez A, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1045–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gold JS, Gönen M, Gutiérrez A, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1045–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimäki J, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:265–74.CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimäki J, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:265–74.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ng EH, Pollock RE, Munsell MF, et al. Prognostic factors influencing survival in gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas. Implications for surgical management and staging. Ann Surg. 1992;215:68–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ng EH, Pollock RE, Munsell MF, et al. Prognostic factors influencing survival in gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas. Implications for surgical management and staging. Ann Surg. 1992;215:68–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Michej W, et al. Risk criteria and prognostic factors for predicting recurrences after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2018–27.CrossRefPubMed Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Michej W, et al. Risk criteria and prognostic factors for predicting recurrences after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2018–27.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Takahashi T, Nakajima K, Nishitani A, et al. An enhanced risk-group stratification system for more practical prognostication of clinically malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Clin Oncol 2007;12:369–74.CrossRefPubMed Takahashi T, Nakajima K, Nishitani A, et al. An enhanced risk-group stratification system for more practical prognostication of clinically malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Clin Oncol 2007;12:369–74.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yanagimoto Y, Takahashi T, Muguruma K, et al. Re-appraisal of risk classifications for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after complete resection: indications for adjuvant therapy. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:426–33.CrossRefPubMed Yanagimoto Y, Takahashi T, Muguruma K, et al. Re-appraisal of risk classifications for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after complete resection: indications for adjuvant therapy. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:426–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hølmebakk T, Bjerkehagen B, Boye K, et al. Definition and clinical significance of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the small intestine. Br J Surg. 2016;103:684–91.CrossRefPubMed Hølmebakk T, Bjerkehagen B, Boye K, et al. Definition and clinical significance of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the small intestine. Br J Surg. 2016;103:684–91.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hølmebakk T, Hompland I, Bjerkehagen B, et al. Recurrence-free survival after resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors classified according to a strict definition of tumor rupture: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1133–9.CrossRefPubMed Hølmebakk T, Hompland I, Bjerkehagen B, et al. Recurrence-free survival after resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors classified according to a strict definition of tumor rupture: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1133–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nishida T, Cho H, Hirota S, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of primary gists with tumor rupture in the real world. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(7):1961–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nishida T, Cho H, Hirota S, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of primary gists with tumor rupture in the real world. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(7):1961–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Wozniak A, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour: the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:890–6.CrossRefPubMed Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Wozniak A, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour: the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:890–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wozniak A, Rutkowski P, Schöffski P, et al. Tumor genotype is an independent prognostic factor in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors of gastric origin: a European multicenter analysis based on ConticaGIST. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6105–16.CrossRefPubMed Wozniak A, Rutkowski P, Schöffski P, et al. Tumor genotype is an independent prognostic factor in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors of gastric origin: a European multicenter analysis based on ConticaGIST. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6105–16.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bischof DA, Kim Y, Dodson R, et al. Conditional disease-free survival after surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of 502 patients. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:299–306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bischof DA, Kim Y, Dodson R, et al. Conditional disease-free survival after surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of 502 patients. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:299–306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Kim MC, Yook JH, Yang HK, et al. Long-term surgical outcome of 1057 gastric GISTs according to 7th UICC/AJCC TNM system: multicenter observational study from Korea and Japan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim MC, Yook JH, Yang HK, et al. Long-term surgical outcome of 1057 gastric GISTs according to 7th UICC/AJCC TNM system: multicenter observational study from Korea and Japan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Hohenberger P, Ronellenfitsch U, Oladeji O, et al. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1854–9.CrossRefPubMed Hohenberger P, Ronellenfitsch U, Oladeji O, et al. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1854–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer. 2014;120:2325–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer. 2014;120:2325–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Boye K, Berner JM, Hompland I, et al. Genotype and risk of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2018;105:e169–e175.CrossRefPubMed Boye K, Berner JM, Hompland I, et al. Genotype and risk of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2018;105:e169–e175.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Nishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:416–30.CrossRefPubMed Nishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:416–30.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, et al. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8 Suppl 2:S1–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, et al. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8 Suppl 2:S1–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Poveda Velasco A, et al. Time to definitive failure to the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor in localized GI stromal tumors treated with Imatinib as an adjuvant: a European Organisation for Research and treatment of cancer soft tissue and bone Sarcoma Group Intergroup randomized trial in collaboration with the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4276–83.CrossRefPubMed Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Poveda Velasco A, et al. Time to definitive failure to the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor in localized GI stromal tumors treated with Imatinib as an adjuvant: a European Organisation for Research and treatment of cancer soft tissue and bone Sarcoma Group Intergroup randomized trial in collaboration with the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4276–83.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, Shimoda T. Clinicopathologic study of primary malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach, with special reference to prognostic factors: analysis of results in 140 surgically resected patients. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:39–48.CrossRefPubMed Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, Shimoda T. Clinicopathologic study of primary malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach, with special reference to prognostic factors: analysis of results in 140 surgically resected patients. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:39–48.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Eriksson M, Reichardt P, Hall KS, et al. Needle biopsy through the abdominal wall for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour: does it increase the risk for tumour cell seeding and recurrence? Eur J Cancer 2016; 59: 128–33.CrossRefPubMed Eriksson M, Reichardt P, Hall KS, et al. Needle biopsy through the abdominal wall for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour: does it increase the risk for tumour cell seeding and recurrence? Eur J Cancer 2016; 59: 128–33.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference McCarter MD, Antonescu CR, Ballman KV, et al. Microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of risk factors and tumor recurrence. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 53–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCarter MD, Antonescu CR, Ballman KV, et al. Microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of risk factors and tumor recurrence. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 53–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Tielen R, Verhoef C, van Coevorden F, et al. Surgical treatment of locally advanced, non-metastatic, gastrointestinal stromal tumours after treatment with imatinib. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:150–5.CrossRefPubMed Tielen R, Verhoef C, van Coevorden F, et al. Surgical treatment of locally advanced, non-metastatic, gastrointestinal stromal tumours after treatment with imatinib. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:150–5.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Adjuvant imatinib for high-risk GI stromal tumor: analysis of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:244–50.CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Adjuvant imatinib for high-risk GI stromal tumor: analysis of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:244–50.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Chen Y, Hao J, Yang Y, et al. Tumor rupture predicts early metastasis and poor prognosis in stage III soft tissue sarcomas. World J Surg. 2011;35:1002–9.CrossRefPubMed Chen Y, Hao J, Yang Y, et al. Tumor rupture predicts early metastasis and poor prognosis in stage III soft tissue sarcomas. World J Surg. 2011;35:1002–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Bonvalot S, Levy A, Terrier P, et al. Primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas: does local control impact survival? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:194–201.CrossRefPubMed Bonvalot S, Levy A, Terrier P, et al. Primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas: does local control impact survival? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:194–201.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Rutkowski P, Trepka S, Ptaszynski K, et al. Surgery quality and tumor status impact on survival and local control of resectable liposarcomas of extremities or the trunk wall. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:860–70.CrossRefPubMed Rutkowski P, Trepka S, Ptaszynski K, et al. Surgery quality and tumor status impact on survival and local control of resectable liposarcomas of extremities or the trunk wall. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:860–70.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Harati K, Goertz O, Pieper A, et al. Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: surgical margins can be close as long as the resected tumor has no ink on it. Oncologist. 2017;22:1400–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harati K, Goertz O, Pieper A, et al. Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: surgical margins can be close as long as the resected tumor has no ink on it. Oncologist. 2017;22:1400–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Gronchi A, Strauss DC, Miceli R, et al. Variability in patterns of recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS): a report on 1007 patients from the Multi-institutional Collaborative RPS Working Group. Ann Surg. 2016;263:1002–9.CrossRefPubMed Gronchi A, Strauss DC, Miceli R, et al. Variability in patterns of recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS): a report on 1007 patients from the Multi-institutional Collaborative RPS Working Group. Ann Surg. 2016;263:1002–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Fairweather M, Gonzalez RJ, Strauss D, Raut CP. Current principles of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:33–41CrossRefPubMed Fairweather M, Gonzalez RJ, Strauss D, Raut CP. Current principles of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:33–41CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Bianchi G, Sambri A, Cammelli S, et al. Impact of residual disease after “unplanned excision” of primary localized adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: evaluation of 452 cases at a single Institution. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017;101:243–8.CrossRefPubMed Bianchi G, Sambri A, Cammelli S, et al. Impact of residual disease after “unplanned excision” of primary localized adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: evaluation of 452 cases at a single Institution. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017;101:243–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Toulmonde M, Bonvalot S, Méeus P, et al. Retroperitoneal sarcomas: patterns of care at diagnosis, prognostic factors and focus on main histological subtypes: a multicenter analysis of the French Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:735–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Toulmonde M, Bonvalot S, Méeus P, et al. Retroperitoneal sarcomas: patterns of care at diagnosis, prognostic factors and focus on main histological subtypes: a multicenter analysis of the French Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:735–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Bonvalot S, Rivoire M, Castaing M, et al. Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:31–7.CrossRefPubMed Bonvalot S, Rivoire M, Castaing M, et al. Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:31–7.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Mussi CE, Daolio P, Cimino M, et al. Atypical lipomatous tumors: should they be treated like other sarcoma or not? Surgical consideration from a bi-institutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4090–7.CrossRefPubMed Mussi CE, Daolio P, Cimino M, et al. Atypical lipomatous tumors: should they be treated like other sarcoma or not? Surgical consideration from a bi-institutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4090–7.CrossRefPubMed
42.
43.
go back to reference Rousseau M, Morel A, Dechoux S, et al. Can the risks associated with uterine sarcoma morcellation really be prevented? Overview of the role of uterine morcellation in 2018. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(8):341–9.CrossRefPubMed Rousseau M, Morel A, Dechoux S, et al. Can the risks associated with uterine sarcoma morcellation really be prevented? Overview of the role of uterine morcellation in 2018. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(8):341–9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Raspagliesi F, Maltese G, Bogani G, et al. Morcellation worsens survival outcomes in patients with undiagnosed uterine leiomyosarcomas: a retrospective MITO group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144:90–5.CrossRefPubMed Raspagliesi F, Maltese G, Bogani G, et al. Morcellation worsens survival outcomes in patients with undiagnosed uterine leiomyosarcomas: a retrospective MITO group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144:90–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Defining Tumor Rupture in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Authors
Toshirou Nishida, MD, PhD, FACS
Toto Hølmebakk, MD
Chandrajit P. Raut, MD, Msc
Piotr Rutkowski, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07297-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019 Go to the issue