Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2018

Open Access 01-07-2018 | Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Primary GISTs with Tumor Rupture in the Real World

Authors: Toshirou Nishida, Haruhiko Cho, Seiichi Hirota, Toru Masuzawa, Gaku Chiguchi, Toshimasa Tsujinaka, the Kinki GIST Study Group

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are recommended for imatinib adjuvant therapy; however, their clinicopathological features and prognosis in the era of imatinib are unknown.

Patients and Methods

The study cohort included 665 patients with histologically proven primary GISTs who underwent R0 or R1 surgery between 2003 and 2007; the validation cohort included 182 patients between 2000 and 2014. The definitions of tumor rupture in the study included perforation at tumor site, tumor fracture, piecemeal resection including open biopsy, and macroscopic injuries to the pseudocapsule.

Results

Tumor rupture occurred in 21 (3.2%) of 665 and 5 (2.9%) of 182 patients in the study and validation cohort, respectively. Ruptured GISTs were more symptomatic, were larger in size, and had higher mitotic count than nonruptured GISTs but were not associated with tumor location or laparoscopic surgery. GISTs with intraoperative rupture had clinicopathological features and prognostic outcomes similar to those with preoperative rupture. Recurrence rates were higher and median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were shorter with ruptured than nonruptured GIST. Tumor rupture was one of the independent prognostic factors for RFS, but not OS, according to multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Ruptured GISTs were symptomatic larger tumors with high mitotic activity, frequent relapse, and shorter RFS. Tumor rupture was an independent prognostic factor for RFS, but not for OS, in the era of imatinib.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Nishida T, Blay JY, Hirota S, et al. The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:3–14.CrossRefPubMed Nishida T, Blay JY, Hirota S, et al. The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:3–14.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimäki J, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:265–74.CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimäki J, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:265–74.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:59–465. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:59–465.
5.
go back to reference Joensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1411–9.CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1411–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:70–83.CrossRefPubMed Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:70–83.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gold JS, Gönen M, Gutiérrez A, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1045–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gold JS, Gönen M, Gutiérrez A, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1045–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Rossi S, Miceli R, Messerini L, et al. Natural history of imatinib-naive GISTs: a retrospective analysis of 929 cases with long-term follow-up and development of a survival nomogram based on mitotic index and size as continuous variables. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1646–56.CrossRefPubMed Rossi S, Miceli R, Messerini L, et al. Natural history of imatinib-naive GISTs: a retrospective analysis of 929 cases with long-term follow-up and development of a survival nomogram based on mitotic index and size as continuous variables. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1646–56.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Goh BK, Chow PK, Yap WM, et al. Which is the optimal risk stratification system for surgically treated localized primary GIST? Comparison of three contemporary prognostic criteria in 171 tumors and a proposal for a modified Armed Forces Institute of Pathology risk criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2153–63.CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Chow PK, Yap WM, et al. Which is the optimal risk stratification system for surgically treated localized primary GIST? Comparison of three contemporary prognostic criteria in 171 tumors and a proposal for a modified Armed Forces Institute of Pathology risk criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2153–63.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Takahashi T, Nakajima K, Nishitani A, et al. An enhanced risk-group stratification system for more practical prognostication of clinically malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:369–74.CrossRefPubMed Takahashi T, Nakajima K, Nishitani A, et al. An enhanced risk-group stratification system for more practical prognostication of clinically malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:369–74.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Wozniak A, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour—the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37: 890–6.CrossRefPubMed Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Wozniak A, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour—the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37: 890–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yanagimoto Y, Takahashi T, Muguruma K, et al. Re-appraisal of risk classifications for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after complete resection: indications for adjuvant therapy. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:426–33.CrossRefPubMed Yanagimoto Y, Takahashi T, Muguruma K, et al. Re-appraisal of risk classifications for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after complete resection: indications for adjuvant therapy. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:426–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer. 2014;120:2325–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer. 2014;120:2325–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hølmebakk T, Bjerkehagenc, B, Boye K, et al. Definition and clinical significance of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the small intestine. Br J Surg. 2016;103:684–691.CrossRefPubMed Hølmebakk T, Bjerkehagenc, B, Boye K, et al. Definition and clinical significance of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the small intestine. Br J Surg. 2016;103:684–691.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hohenberger P, Ronellenfitsch U, Oladeji O, et al. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1854–9.CrossRefPubMed Hohenberger P, Ronellenfitsch U, Oladeji O, et al. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1854–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Michej W, et al. Risk criteria and prognostic factors for predicting recurrences after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2018–27.CrossRefPubMed Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Michej W, et al. Risk criteria and prognostic factors for predicting recurrences after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2018–27.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. One versus three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. One versus three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Poveda Velasco A, et al. Time to definitive failure to the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor in localized GI stromal tumors treated with imatinib as an adjuvant: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group intergroup randomized trial in collaboration with the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4276–83.CrossRefPubMed Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Poveda Velasco A, et al. Time to definitive failure to the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor in localized GI stromal tumors treated with imatinib as an adjuvant: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group intergroup randomized trial in collaboration with the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4276–83.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Wozniak A, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour–the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:890–6.CrossRefPubMed Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Wozniak A, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour–the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:890–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bischof DA, Kim Y, Behman R, et al. A nomogram to predict disease-free survival after surgical resection of GIST. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:2123–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bischof DA, Kim Y, Behman R, et al. A nomogram to predict disease-free survival after surgical resection of GIST. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:2123–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Kim JS, Kim HJ, Park SH, et al. Computed tomography features and predictive findings of ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2583–90.CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Kim HJ, Park SH, et al. Computed tomography features and predictive findings of ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2583–90.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yamamoto K, Tsujinaka T, Takahashi T, et al. Impact of the Japanese gastric cancer screening system on treatment outcomes in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): an analysis based on the GIST registry. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:232–9.CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto K, Tsujinaka T, Takahashi T, et al. Impact of the Japanese gastric cancer screening system on treatment outcomes in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): an analysis based on the GIST registry. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:232–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Verduijn M, Grootendorst DC, Dekker FW, et al. The analysis of competing events like cause-specific mortality-beware of the Kaplan–Meier method. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:56–61.CrossRefPubMed Verduijn M, Grootendorst DC, Dekker FW, et al. The analysis of competing events like cause-specific mortality-beware of the Kaplan–Meier method. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:56–61.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference DeMatteo RP, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, et al. Long-term results of adjuvant imatinib mesylate in localized, high-risk, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ACOSOG Z9000 (Alliance) intergroup phase 2 trial. Ann Surg. 2013;258:422–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeMatteo RP, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, et al. Long-term results of adjuvant imatinib mesylate in localized, high-risk, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ACOSOG Z9000 (Alliance) intergroup phase 2 trial. Ann Surg. 2013;258:422–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Ng EH, Pollock RE, Munsell MF, et al. Prognostic factors influencing survival in gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas. Implications for surgical management and staging. Ann Surg. 1992;215:68–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ng EH, Pollock RE, Munsell MF, et al. Prognostic factors influencing survival in gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas. Implications for surgical management and staging. Ann Surg. 1992;215:68–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer. 2014;120:2325–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer. 2014;120:2325–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Primary GISTs with Tumor Rupture in the Real World
Authors
Toshirou Nishida
Haruhiko Cho
Seiichi Hirota
Toru Masuzawa
Gaku Chiguchi
Toshimasa Tsujinaka
the Kinki GIST Study Group
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6505-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2018 Go to the issue