Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018

01-12-2018 | Pancreatic Tumors

Association Between Very Small Tumor Size and Decreased Overall Survival in Node-Positive Pancreatic Cancer

Authors: Vinayak Muralidhar, MD, MSc, Ryan D. Nipp, MD, Harvey J. Mamon, MD, PhD, Rinaa S. Punglia, MD, MPH, Theodore S. Hong, MD, Cristina Ferrone, MD, Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo, MD, Aparna Parikh, MD, Paul L. Nguyen, MD, Jennifer Y. Wo, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), increasing tumor size usually correlates with a worse prognosis. However, patients with a very small primary tumor who experience lymph node involvement may have a different disease biology. This study sought to determine the interaction between tumor size and lymph node involvement in terms of overall survival (OS).

Methods

The study identified 17,073 patients with a diagnosis of M0 resected PDAC between 1983 and 2013 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were stratified by lymph node involvement (N0 vs N+) and T stage (T1a–T1b vs T1c vs T2 vs T3 vs T4). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate OS, and Cox regression analysis was used to compare survival between subgroups after adjustment for patient-specific factors.

Results

Lymph node involvement and T stage significantly interacted (p < 0.001). Among the patients with node-negative disease, 5-year OS decreased monotonically with increasing T stage (59.1%, 30.6%, 22.9%, 16.6%, and 8.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). In contrast, among the patients with node-positive disease, those with T1a–T1b tumors (< 10 mm) had worse 5-year OS than those with T1c tumors (7.4% vs 17.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–0.97; p = 0.034) and similar survival compared with those who had T2, T3, or T4 tumors (9.7%, 8.2%, and 4.8%, respectively; p > 0.2 in all cases).

Conclusions

Among patients with lymph node-positive PDAC, very small primary tumors are associated with decreased OS. This finding raises the possibility that small tumors capable of lymph node metastasis might represent more biologically aggressive cancers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.
2.
go back to reference Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th ed) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265:185–91.CrossRef Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th ed) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265:185–91.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, et al. (eds.) Molecular cell biology. 4th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman; 2000. Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, et al. (eds.) Molecular cell biology. 4th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman; 2000.
4.
go back to reference Wo JY, Chen K, Neville BA, Lin NU, Punglia RS. Effect of very small tumor size on cancer-specific mortality in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2619–27.CrossRef Wo JY, Chen K, Neville BA, Lin NU, Punglia RS. Effect of very small tumor size on cancer-specific mortality in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2619–27.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Muralidhar V, Mahal BA, Nezolosky MD, et al. Association between very small tumour size and increased cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy in lymph node-positive prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016;118:279–85.CrossRef Muralidhar V, Mahal BA, Nezolosky MD, et al. Association between very small tumour size and increased cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy in lymph node-positive prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016;118:279–85.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Muralidhar V, Nipp RD, Ryan DP, Hong TS, Nguyen PL, Wo JY. Association between very small tumor size and increased cancer-specific mortality in node-positive colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:187–93.CrossRef Muralidhar V, Nipp RD, Ryan DP, Hong TS, Nguyen PL, Wo JY. Association between very small tumor size and increased cancer-specific mortality in node-positive colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:187–93.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Cham: Springer; 2017.CrossRef Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Cham: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schemper M, Smith TL. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:343–6.CrossRef Schemper M, Smith TL. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:343–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:1011–24.CrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:1011–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1473–81.CrossRef Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1473–81.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.CrossRef Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. Unicancer GI PRODIGE 24/CCTG PA.6 trial: a multicenter international randomized phase III trial of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine (gem) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (abstract LBA4001). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(Suppl). Presented at ASCO 2018.CrossRef Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. Unicancer GI PRODIGE 24/CCTG PA.6 trial: a multicenter international randomized phase III trial of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine (gem) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (abstract LBA4001). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(Suppl). Presented at ASCO 2018.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Katz MH, Shi Q, Ahmad SA, et al. Preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX treatment followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:e161137.CrossRef Katz MH, Shi Q, Ahmad SA, et al. Preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX treatment followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:e161137.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Murphy JE, Wo JY, Ryan DP, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX followed by individualized chemoradiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(7):963–69.CrossRef Murphy JE, Wo JY, Ryan DP, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX followed by individualized chemoradiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(7):963–69.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:801–10.CrossRef Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:801–10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Versteijne E, van Eijck CH, Punt CJ, et al. Preoperative radiochemotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:127.CrossRef Versteijne E, van Eijck CH, Punt CJ, et al. Preoperative radiochemotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:127.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1114–7.CrossRef Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1114–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tao LY, Zhang LF, Xiu DR, Yuan CH, Ma ZL, Jiang B. Prognostic significance of K-ras mutations in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:146.CrossRef Tao LY, Zhang LF, Xiu DR, Yuan CH, Ma ZL, Jiang B. Prognostic significance of K-ras mutations in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:146.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Xiang JF, Wang WQ, Liu L, et al. Mutant p53 determines pancreatic cancer poor prognosis to pancreatectomy through upregulation of cavin-1 in patients with preoperative serum CA19-9 ≥ 1,000 U/mL. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19222.CrossRef Xiang JF, Wang WQ, Liu L, et al. Mutant p53 determines pancreatic cancer poor prognosis to pancreatectomy through upregulation of cavin-1 in patients with preoperative serum CA19-9 ≥ 1,000 U/mL. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19222.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Blackford A, Serrano OK, Wolfgang CL, et al. SMAD4 gene mutations are associated with poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4674–9.CrossRef Blackford A, Serrano OK, Wolfgang CL, et al. SMAD4 gene mutations are associated with poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4674–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sausen M, Phallen J, Adleff V, et al. Clinical implications of genomic alterations in the tumour and circulation of pancreatic cancer patients. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7686.CrossRef Sausen M, Phallen J, Adleff V, et al. Clinical implications of genomic alterations in the tumour and circulation of pancreatic cancer patients. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7686.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1576–85.CrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1576–85.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer: adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985;120:899–903.CrossRef Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer: adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985;120:899–903.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, et al. Long-term survival and metastatic pattern of pancreatic and periampullary cancer after adjuvant chemoradiation or observation: long-term results of EORTC trial 40891. Ann Surg. 2007;246:734–40.CrossRef Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, et al. Long-term survival and metastatic pattern of pancreatic and periampullary cancer after adjuvant chemoradiation or observation: long-term results of EORTC trial 40891. Ann Surg. 2007;246:734–40.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Amin S, Lucas AL, Frucht H. Evidence for treatment and survival disparities by age in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis. Pancreas. 2013;42:249–53.CrossRef Amin S, Lucas AL, Frucht H. Evidence for treatment and survival disparities by age in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis. Pancreas. 2013;42:249–53.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ma J, Siegel R, Jemal A. Pancreatic cancer death rates by race among US men and women, 1970–2009. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1694–700.CrossRef Ma J, Siegel R, Jemal A. Pancreatic cancer death rates by race among US men and women, 1970–2009. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1694–700.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wasif N, Ko CY, Farrell J, et al. Impact of tumor grade on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: should we include grade in AJCC staging? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2312–20.CrossRef Wasif N, Ko CY, Farrell J, et al. Impact of tumor grade on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: should we include grade in AJCC staging? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2312–20.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Badger SA, Brant JL, Jones C, et al. The role of surgery for pancreatic cancer: a 12-year review of patient outcome. Ulster Med J. 2010;79:70–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Badger SA, Brant JL, Jones C, et al. The role of surgery for pancreatic cancer: a 12-year review of patient outcome. Ulster Med J. 2010;79:70–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Mellon EA, Springett GM, Hoffe SE, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and lymph node dissection in pancreatic cancer treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Cancer. 2014;120:1171–7.CrossRef Mellon EA, Springett GM, Hoffe SE, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and lymph node dissection in pancreatic cancer treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Cancer. 2014;120:1171–7.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Herman JM, Swartz MJ, Hsu CC, et al. Analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: results of a large, prospectively collected database at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3503–10.CrossRef Herman JM, Swartz MJ, Hsu CC, et al. Analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: results of a large, prospectively collected database at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3503–10.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Corsini MM, Miller RC, Haddock MG, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma: the Mayo Clinic experience (1975–2005). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3511–6.CrossRef Corsini MM, Miller RC, Haddock MG, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma: the Mayo Clinic experience (1975–2005). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3511–6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mazzola C, Savage C, Ahallal Y, et al. Nodal counts during pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: an objective indicator of quality under the influence of very subjective factors. BJU Int. 2012;109:1323–8.CrossRef Mazzola C, Savage C, Ahallal Y, et al. Nodal counts during pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: an objective indicator of quality under the influence of very subjective factors. BJU Int. 2012;109:1323–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association Between Very Small Tumor Size and Decreased Overall Survival in Node-Positive Pancreatic Cancer
Authors
Vinayak Muralidhar, MD, MSc
Ryan D. Nipp, MD
Harvey J. Mamon, MD, PhD
Rinaa S. Punglia, MD, MPH
Theodore S. Hong, MD
Cristina Ferrone, MD
Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo, MD
Aparna Parikh, MD
Paul L. Nguyen, MD
Jennifer Y. Wo, MD
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6832-8

Other articles of this Issue 13/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018 Go to the issue