Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Prediction of Overall Survival and Novel Classification of Patients with Gastric Cancer Using the Survival Recurrent Network

Authors: Sung Eun Oh, MD, Sung Wook Seo, MD, PhD, Min-Gew Choi, MD, Tae Sung Sohn, MD, Jae Moon Bae, MD, Sung Kim, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been applied to many prediction and classification problems, and could also be used to develop a prediction model of survival outcomes for cancer patients.

Objective

The aim of this study is to develop a prediction model of survival outcomes for patients with gastric cancer using an ANN.

Methods

This study enrolled 1243 patients with stage IIA–IV gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy from January 2007 to June 2010. We used a recurrent neural network (RNN) to make the survival recurrent network (SRN), and patients were randomly sorted into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). Fivefold cross-validation was performed with the training set, and the optimized model was evaluated with the test set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curves (AUCs) were evaluated, and we compared the survival curves of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th stage groups with those of the groups classified by the SRN-predicted survival probability.

Results

The test data showed that the ROC AUC of the SRN was 0.81 at the fifth year. The SRN-predicted survival corresponded closely with the actual survival in the calibration curve, and the survival outcome could be more discriminately classified by using the SRN than by using the AJCC staging system.

Conclusion

SRN was a more powerful tool for predicting the survival rates of gastric cancer patients than conventional TNM staging, and may also provide a more flexible and expandable method when compared with fixed prediction models such as nomograms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108.CrossRefPubMed Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3077–3079.CrossRefPubMed Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3077–3079.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–112. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–112.
5.
go back to reference Chen D, Jiang B, Xing J, et al. Validation of the memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to predict disease-specific survival after R0 resection in a Chinese gastric cancer population. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76041.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen D, Jiang B, Xing J, et al. Validation of the memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to predict disease-specific survival after R0 resection in a Chinese gastric cancer population. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76041.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Kattan MW, Karpeh MS, Mazumdar M, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3647–3650.CrossRefPubMed Kattan MW, Karpeh MS, Mazumdar M, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3647–3650.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Baxt WG. Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:1135–1138.CrossRefPubMed Baxt WG. Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:1135–1138.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Grossi E, Mancini A, Buscema M. International experience on the use of artificial neural networks in gastroenterology. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:278–285.CrossRefPubMed Grossi E, Mancini A, Buscema M. International experience on the use of artificial neural networks in gastroenterology. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:278–285.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tu JV. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1225–1231.CrossRefPubMed Tu JV. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1225–1231.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, et al. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer. 1997;79:857–862.CrossRefPubMed Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, et al. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer. 1997;79:857–862.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Biglarian A, Hajizadeh E, Kazemnejad A, Zali MR. Application of artificial neural network in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Iran J Public Health. 2011;40:80–86.PubMedPubMedCentral Biglarian A, Hajizadeh E, Kazemnejad A, Zali MR. Application of artificial neural network in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Iran J Public Health. 2011;40:80–86.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Zhu L, Luo W, Su M, Wei H, Wei J, Zhang X, et al. Comparison between artificial neural network and Cox regression model in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Biomed Rep. 2013;1:757–760.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhu L, Luo W, Su M, Wei H, Wei J, Zhang X, et al. Comparison between artificial neural network and Cox regression model in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Biomed Rep. 2013;1:757–760.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hush DR, Horne BG. Progress in supervised neural networks. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 1993;10:8–39.CrossRef Hush DR, Horne BG. Progress in supervised neural networks. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 1993;10:8–39.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Larose DT. Discovering knowledge in data: an introduction to data mining. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2005:90–106.CrossRef Larose DT. Discovering knowledge in data: an introduction to data mining. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2005:90–106.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Anguita D, Ghelardoni L, Ghio A, Oneto L, Ridella S. The ‘K’ in K-fold Cross Validation. ESANN 2012 proceedings. ESANN 2012 proceedings, European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning. 25–27 April 2012; Bruges: pp. 441–446. Anguita D, Ghelardoni L, Ghio A, Oneto L, Ridella S. The ‘K’ in K-fold Cross Validation. ESANN 2012 proceedings. ESANN 2012 proceedings, European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning. 25–27 April 2012; Bruges: pp. 441–446.
16.
go back to reference Lasko TA, Bhagwat JG, Zou KH, Ohno-Machado L. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:404–15.CrossRefPubMed Lasko TA, Bhagwat JG, Zou KH, Ohno-Machado L. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:404–15.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Peeters KC, Kattan MW, Hartgrink HH, Kranenbarg EK, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF, van de Velde CJ. Validation of a nomogram for predicting disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:702–707.CrossRefPubMed Peeters KC, Kattan MW, Hartgrink HH, Kranenbarg EK, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF, van de Velde CJ. Validation of a nomogram for predicting disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:702–707.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference AR Novotny, C Schuhmacher, R Busch, MW Kattan, MF Brennan, JR Siewert. Predicting individual survival after gastric cancer resection: validation of a U.S.-derived nomogram at a single high-volume center in Europe. Ann Surg. 2006;243:74–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral AR Novotny, C Schuhmacher, R Busch, MW Kattan, MF Brennan, JR Siewert. Predicting individual survival after gastric cancer resection: validation of a U.S.-derived nomogram at a single high-volume center in Europe. Ann Surg. 2006;243:74–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH, et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg. 2010;251:640–646.CrossRefPubMed Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH, et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg. 2010;251:640–646.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ashfaq A, Kidwell JT, McGhan LJ, et al. Validation of a gastric cancer nomogram using a cancer registry. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:377–380.CrossRefPubMed Ashfaq A, Kidwell JT, McGhan LJ, et al. Validation of a gastric cancer nomogram using a cancer registry. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:377–380.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kim JH, Kim HS, Seo WY, et al. External validation of nomogram for the prediction of recurrence after curative resection in early gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:361–367.CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Kim HS, Seo WY, et al. External validation of nomogram for the prediction of recurrence after curative resection in early gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:361–367.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Song KY, Park YG, Jeon HM, Park CH. A nomogram for predicting individual survival of patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical surgery with extended lymph node dissection. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:287–293.CrossRefPubMed Song KY, Park YG, Jeon HM, Park CH. A nomogram for predicting individual survival of patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical surgery with extended lymph node dissection. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:287–293.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Eom BW, Ryu KW, Nam BH, et al. Survival nomogram for curatively resected Korean gastric cancer patients: multicenter retrospective analysis with external validation. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119671.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eom BW, Ryu KW, Nam BH, et al. Survival nomogram for curatively resected Korean gastric cancer patients: multicenter retrospective analysis with external validation. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119671.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Brennan MF. Current status of surgery for gastric cancer: a review. Gastric Cancer. 2005;8:64–70.CrossRefPubMed Brennan MF. Current status of surgery for gastric cancer: a review. Gastric Cancer. 2005;8:64–70.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Fondevila C, Metges JP, Fuster J, et al. p53 and VEGF expression are independent predictors of tumour recurrence and survival following curative resection of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:206–215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fondevila C, Metges JP, Fuster J, et al. p53 and VEGF expression are independent predictors of tumour recurrence and survival following curative resection of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:206–215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Prediction of Overall Survival and Novel Classification of Patients with Gastric Cancer Using the Survival Recurrent Network
Authors
Sung Eun Oh, MD
Sung Wook Seo, MD, PhD
Min-Gew Choi, MD
Tae Sung Sohn, MD
Jae Moon Bae, MD
Sung Kim, MD
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6343-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2018 Go to the issue