Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Breast Oncology

What to Do with Non-visualized Sentinel Nodes? A Dutch Nationwide Survey Study

Authors: Nicole C. Verheuvel, MSc, MD, Adri C. Voogd, PhD, Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen, MD, PhD, Rudi M. H. Roumen, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

International guidelines differ regarding their recommendations on axillary treatment of patients with non-visualized sentinel lymph nodes (non-vSLN). Therefore, we distributed a survey among Dutch oncological surgeons to determine their routine practice and opinion regarding axillary treatment in case of a non-vSLN, with the emphasis on whether these practices and opinions have changed since publication of the Z0011 trial.

Methods

A Dutch nationwide survey containing 10 questions regarding clinical routine during the sentinel node procedure and axillary treatment of non-vSLN patients was distributed among 510 oncological surgeons.

Results

The survey was completed by 122 (24%) oncological surgeons, of whom 116 (95%) were registered as specialized breast surgeons. These surgeons had, on average, 13 years of experience. The majority of respondents used both lymphoscintigraphy and Patent Blue during the sentinel node procedure, and 39% estimated the prevalence of a non-vSLN to be 1–2%. Most surgeons are currently more reserved when considering whether to perform an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) than prior to publication of the Z0011 trial (15 vs. 80%, respectively). Sixty percent base their decision on various clinicopathological characteristics. Twenty-three respondents (20%) opted for an alternative axillary treatment.

Conclusion

This study shows that, in daily practice, most specialized breast surgeons think that a non-vSLN is rare. If so, most currently opt not to perform an ALND, whereas a small proportion consider an alternative axillary treatment. These decisions differ than in the period prior to the Z0011 trial. More research is needed to provide optimal treatment recommendations in case of a non-vSLN.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011;305(6):569–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011;305(6):569–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(12):1303–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(12):1303–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2007;8(10):881–8.CrossRefPubMed Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2007;8(10):881–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(10):927–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(10):927–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Dordea M, Colvin H, Cox P, Pujol Nicolas A, Kanakala V, Iwuchukwu O. Clinical and histopathological factors affecting failed sentinel node localization in axillary staging for breast cancer. Surgeon 2013;11(2):63–6.CrossRefPubMed Dordea M, Colvin H, Cox P, Pujol Nicolas A, Kanakala V, Iwuchukwu O. Clinical and histopathological factors affecting failed sentinel node localization in axillary staging for breast cancer. Surgeon 2013;11(2):63–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A, Mansel RE; ALMANAC Trialists Group. Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;99(2):203–8.CrossRefPubMed Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A, Mansel RE; ALMANAC Trialists Group. Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;99(2):203–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre (NBOCC) Australia. Recommendations for use of Sentinel node biopsy in early (operable) breast cancer (June 2008); Cancer Australia; 2011. Available at: www.canceraustralia.gov.au. Accessed 15 Jun 2016. National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre (NBOCC) Australia. Recommendations for use of Sentinel node biopsy in early (operable) breast cancer (June 2008); Cancer Australia; 2011. Available at: www.​canceraustralia.​gov.​au. Accessed 15 Jun 2016.
9.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): breast cancer. 2016;1.2016. Available at: www.nccn.com. Accessed 16 Jun 2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): breast cancer. 2016;1.2016. Available at: www.​nccn.​com. Accessed 16 Jun 2016.
10.
go back to reference Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015;26 Suppl 5:v8–v30.CrossRefPubMed Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015;26 Suppl 5:v8–v30.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chagpar AB. Predicting extensive nodal disease in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(1):3–4.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar AB. Predicting extensive nodal disease in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(1):3–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Katz A, Smith BL, Golshan M, Niemierko A, Kobayashi W, Raad RA, et al. Nomogram for the prediction of having four or more involved nodes for sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(13):2093–8.CrossRefPubMed Katz A, Smith BL, Golshan M, Niemierko A, Kobayashi W, Raad RA, et al. Nomogram for the prediction of having four or more involved nodes for sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(13):2093–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Unal B, Gur AS, Beriwal S, Tang G, Johnson R, Ahrendt G, et al. Predicting likelihood of having four or more positive nodes in patient with sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer: a nomogram validation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75(4):1035–40.CrossRefPubMed Unal B, Gur AS, Beriwal S, Tang G, Johnson R, Ahrendt G, et al. Predicting likelihood of having four or more positive nodes in patient with sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer: a nomogram validation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75(4):1035–40.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Qiu SQ, Zeng HC, Zhang F, Chen C, Huang WH, Pleijhuis RG, et al. A nomogram to predict the probability of axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients with positive axillary ultrasound. Sci Rep 2016;6:21196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qiu SQ, Zeng HC, Zhang F, Chen C, Huang WH, Pleijhuis RG, et al. A nomogram to predict the probability of axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients with positive axillary ultrasound. Sci Rep 2016;6:21196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, Boolbol SK, Fey JV, Tan LK, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10(10):1140–51.CrossRefPubMed Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, Boolbol SK, Fey JV, Tan LK, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10(10):1140–51.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB 3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(30):7703–20.CrossRefPubMed Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB 3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(30):7703–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Murray N, Winstanley J, Bennett A, Francis K; Guideline Development Group. Diagnosis and treatment of advanced breast cancer: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2009;338:b509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murray N, Winstanley J, Bennett A, Francis K; Guideline Development Group. Diagnosis and treatment of advanced breast cancer: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2009;338:b509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Chagpar A, Middleton LP, Sahin AA, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Feig BW, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma who have sentinel lymph node micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry. Cancer 2005;103(8):1581–6.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar A, Middleton LP, Sahin AA, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Feig BW, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma who have sentinel lymph node micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry. Cancer 2005;103(8):1581–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Soran A, Falk J, Bonaventura M, Keenan D, Ahrendt G, Johnson R. Does failure to visualize a sentinel node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predict a greater likelihood of axillary lymph node positivity? J Am Coll Surg 2007;205(1):66–71.CrossRefPubMed Soran A, Falk J, Bonaventura M, Keenan D, Ahrendt G, Johnson R. Does failure to visualize a sentinel node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predict a greater likelihood of axillary lymph node positivity? J Am Coll Surg 2007;205(1):66–71.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Goyal A, Mansel RE. Does imaging in sentinel node scintigraphic localization add value to the procedure in patients with breast cancer? Nucl Med Commun 2005;26(10):845–7.CrossRefPubMed Goyal A, Mansel RE. Does imaging in sentinel node scintigraphic localization add value to the procedure in patients with breast cancer? Nucl Med Commun 2005;26(10):845–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brenot-Rossi I, Houvenaeghel G, Jacquemier J, Bardou VJ, Martino M, Hassan-Sebbag N, et al. Nonvisualization of axillary sentinel node during lymphoscintigraphy: is there a pathologic significance in breast cancer? J Nucl Med 2003;44(8):1232–7.PubMed Brenot-Rossi I, Houvenaeghel G, Jacquemier J, Bardou VJ, Martino M, Hassan-Sebbag N, et al. Nonvisualization of axillary sentinel node during lymphoscintigraphy: is there a pathologic significance in breast cancer? J Nucl Med 2003;44(8):1232–7.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Rousseau C, Classe JM, Campion L, Curtet C, Dravet F, Pioud R, et al. The impact of nonvisualization of sentinel nodes on lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12(7):533–8.CrossRefPubMed Rousseau C, Classe JM, Campion L, Curtet C, Dravet F, Pioud R, et al. The impact of nonvisualization of sentinel nodes on lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12(7):533–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Hoefnagel CA, et al. Impact of non-axillary sentinel node biopsy on staging and treatment of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2002;87(7):705–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Hoefnagel CA, et al. Impact of non-axillary sentinel node biopsy on staging and treatment of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2002;87(7):705–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
What to Do with Non-visualized Sentinel Nodes? A Dutch Nationwide Survey Study
Authors
Nicole C. Verheuvel, MSc, MD
Adri C. Voogd, PhD
Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen, MD, PhD
Rudi M. H. Roumen, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5824-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2017 Go to the issue