Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2015

01-12-2015 | Head and Neck Oncology

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Density in Patients with Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Authors: Young-Hoon Joo, MD, Kwang-Jae Cho, MD, Sang-Yeon Kim, MD, Min-Sik Kim, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lymph node density (LND) is more useful than the TNM classification in predicting survival after surgery for many cancers. The purpose of this study was to clarify independent prognostic factors for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) and broaden the staging system to improve its predictive value.

Methods

The present study included 105 patients with HPSCC treated with hypophagectomy and neck dissection between 1993 and 2014.

Results

The median LND in patients with HPSCC was 0.060 (range 0.026–0.620). We found a significant difference in LND values between patients with and without recurrence (0.063 vs. 0.030, respectively; p = 0.001). The cutoff value of LND for recurrence was 0.055, with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 71%. Cervical lymph node metastasis, advanced pathologic T stage, lymphovascular invasion, LND ≥0.055, and extracapsular spread had significant adverse effects on 5-year overall and disease-specific survival in a univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant association between 5-year overall survival and LND ≥0.055 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–4.51; p = 0.035] and extracapsular spread (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.09–5.61; p = 0.030). Furthermore, LND ≥0.055 (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.07–4.93; p = 0.034) and extracapsular spread (HR 2.95; 95% CI 1.20–7.29; p = 0.019) were associated with 5-year, disease-specific survival.

Conclusions

The median LND cutoff values ≥0.055 are associated with a greater risk of recurrence and survival in patients with HPSCC.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Hoffman HT, Karnell LH, Funk GF, Robinson RA, Menck HR. The National Cancer data Base Report on cancer of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:951–62.PubMedCrossRef Hoffman HT, Karnell LH, Funk GF, Robinson RA, Menck HR. The National Cancer data Base Report on cancer of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:951–62.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ho CM, Lam KH, Wei WI, Yuen PW, Lam LK. Squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx—analysis of treatment results. Head Neck. 1993;15:405–12.PubMedCrossRef Ho CM, Lam KH, Wei WI, Yuen PW, Lam LK. Squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx—analysis of treatment results. Head Neck. 1993;15:405–12.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lefebvre JL, Castelain B, DeLaTorre JC, Delobelle-Deroide A, Vankemmel B. Lymph node invasion in hypopharynx and lateral epilarynx: a prognostic factor. Head Neck Surg. 1987;10:14–8.PubMedCrossRef Lefebvre JL, Castelain B, DeLaTorre JC, Delobelle-Deroide A, Vankemmel B. Lymph node invasion in hypopharynx and lateral epilarynx: a prognostic factor. Head Neck Surg. 1987;10:14–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Freeman DE, Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Million RR. Does neck stage influence local control in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:733–6.PubMedCrossRef Freeman DE, Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Million RR. Does neck stage influence local control in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:733–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rudoltz MS, Benammar A, Mohiuddin M. Does pathologic node status affect local control in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:503–8.PubMedCrossRef Rudoltz MS, Benammar A, Mohiuddin M. Does pathologic node status affect local control in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:503–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vinh-Hung V, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, et al. Lymph node ratio as an alternative to pN staging in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1062–8.PubMedCrossRef Vinh-Hung V, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, et al. Lymph node ratio as an alternative to pN staging in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1062–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Herr HW. Superiority of ratio based lymph node staging for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:943–5.PubMedCrossRef Herr HW. Superiority of ratio based lymph node staging for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:943–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Siewert JR, B€ottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Siewert JR, B€ottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ong W, Zhao R, Lui B, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node density in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Head Neck. Doi:10.1002/hed.24113. [Online April 27, 2015].PubMed Ong W, Zhao R, Lui B, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node density in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Head Neck. Doi:10.​1002/​hed.​24113. [Online April 27, 2015].PubMed
11.
go back to reference Patel SG, Amit M, Yen TC, et al. Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2087–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Patel SG, Amit M, Yen TC, et al. Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2087–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gil Z, Carlson DL, Boyle JO, et al. Lymph node density is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with oral cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:5700–10.PubMedCrossRef Gil Z, Carlson DL, Boyle JO, et al. Lymph node density is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with oral cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:5700–10.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kassouf W, Agarwal PK, Herr HW, et al. Lymph node density is superior to TNM nodal status in predicting disease-specific survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis of pooled data from MDACC and MSKCC. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:121–6.PubMedCrossRef Kassouf W, Agarwal PK, Herr HW, et al. Lymph node density is superior to TNM nodal status in predicting disease-specific survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis of pooled data from MDACC and MSKCC. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:121–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Driscoll WG, Nagorsky MJ, Cantrell RW, Johns ME. Carcinoma of the pyriform sinus: analysis of 102 cases. Laryngoscope. 1983;93:556–60.PubMed Driscoll WG, Nagorsky MJ, Cantrell RW, Johns ME. Carcinoma of the pyriform sinus: analysis of 102 cases. Laryngoscope. 1983;93:556–60.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bataini JP, Bernier J, Brugere J, Jaulerry C, Picco C, Brunin F. Natural history of neck disease in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx and pharyngolarynx. Radiother Oncol. 1985;3:245–55.PubMedCrossRef Bataini JP, Bernier J, Brugere J, Jaulerry C, Picco C, Brunin F. Natural history of neck disease in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx and pharyngolarynx. Radiother Oncol. 1985;3:245–55.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kim SY, Nam SY, Choi SH, Cho KJ, Roh JL. Prognostic value of lymph node density in node-positive patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2310–7.PubMedCrossRef Kim SY, Nam SY, Choi SH, Cho KJ, Roh JL. Prognostic value of lymph node density in node-positive patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2310–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ryu IS, Roh JL, Cho KJ, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. Lymph node density as an independent predictor of cancer-specific mortality in patients with lymph node–positive laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma after laryngectomy. Head Neck. Doi:10.1002/hed.23750. [Online May 15, 2014].PubMedCentral Ryu IS, Roh JL, Cho KJ, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. Lymph node density as an independent predictor of cancer-specific mortality in patients with lymph node–positive laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma after laryngectomy. Head Neck. Doi:10.​1002/​hed.​23750. [Online May 15, 2014].PubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Puri SK, Fan CY, Hanna E. Significance of extracapsular lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:119–23.PubMedCrossRef Puri SK, Fan CY, Hanna E. Significance of extracapsular lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:119–23.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vaidya AM, Petruzzelli GJ, Clark J, Emami B. Patterns of spread in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;125:393–6.PubMedCrossRef Vaidya AM, Petruzzelli GJ, Clark J, Emami B. Patterns of spread in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;125:393–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Joo YH, Yoo IeR, Cho KJ, Park JO, Nam IC, Kim MS. Extracapsular spread in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT. Head Neck. 2013;35:1771-6.PubMedCrossRef Joo YH, Yoo IeR, Cho KJ, Park JO, Nam IC, Kim MS. Extracapsular spread in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT. Head Neck. 2013;35:1771-6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Density in Patients with Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Authors
Young-Hoon Joo, MD
Kwang-Jae Cho, MD
Sang-Yeon Kim, MD
Min-Sik Kim, MD
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4726-6

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2015 Go to the issue