Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2015

01-10-2015 | Pancreatic Tumors

Active Surveillance for Adverse Events Within 90 Days: The Standard for Reporting Surgical Outcomes After Pancreatectomy

Authors: Lilian Schwarz, MD, Morgan Bruno, RN, MS, ACNP-BC, Nathan H. Parker, MPH, Laura Prakash, MD, Yoshihiro Mise, MD, PhD, Jeffrey E. Lee, MD, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, MD, Thomas A. Aloia, MD, Claudius Conrad, MD, PhD, Jason B. Fleming, MD, Matthew H. G. Katz, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The rate of adverse events after pancreatectomy is widely reported as a measure of surgical quality. However, morbidity data are routinely acquired retrospectively and often are reported at 30 days. The authors hypothesized that morbidity after pancreatectomy is therefore underreported. They sought to compare rates of adverse events calculated at multiple time points after pancreatectomy.

Methods

The authors instituted an active surveillance system to detect, categorize, and grade the severity of all adverse events after pancreatectomy, using the modified Accordion system and International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definitions. All patients and clinical events were monitored directly for at least 90 days after surgery.

Results

Of 315 consecutively monitored patients, 239 (76 %) experienced 500 unique adverse events. The absolute number of unique adverse events increased by 32 % between index discharge and 90 days and by 10 % between 30 and 90 days. The number of severe adverse events increased by 96 % between discharge and 90 days and by 29 % between 30 and 90 days. In this study, 16 % of the patients experienced at least one severe adverse event within the index hospitalization, 24 % within 30 postoperative days, and 29 % within 90 days. Among the 80 readmissions that occurred within 90 days, 28 (35 %) occurred later than 30 days after pancreatectomy.

Conclusions

Approximately one-third of severe adverse events and readmissions are reported more than 30 days after surgery. All adverse events that occur within 90 days of surgery must be identified and reported for accurate characterization of the morbidity associated with pancreatectomy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica M, et al. Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2013;258:1051–8.CrossRefPubMed Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica M, et al. Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2013;258:1051–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:356–64.CrossRefPubMed Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:356–64.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mehta VV, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, Kooby DA. Is it time to abandon routine operative drain use? A single-institution assessment of 709 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:635–642; discussion 642–634.CrossRefPubMed Mehta VV, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, Kooby DA. Is it time to abandon routine operative drain use? A single-institution assessment of 709 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:635–642; discussion 642–634.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mise Y, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, et al. 90-Day postoperative mortality is a legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary quality. Ann Surg. 2014; In Press. Mise Y, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, et al. 90-Day postoperative mortality is a legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary quality. Ann Surg. 2014; In Press.
5.
go back to reference Brown SR, Mathew R, Keding A, Marshall HC, Brown JM, Jayne DG. The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;259:916–23.CrossRefPubMed Brown SR, Mathew R, Keding A, Marshall HC, Brown JM, Jayne DG. The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;259:916–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2013. Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2013.
7.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242:326–41; discussion 341–323.PubMedCentralPubMed Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242:326–41; discussion 341–323.PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA. Quality assessment in surgery: riding a lame horse. Ann Surg. 2010;251:766–71.CrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA. Quality assessment in surgery: riding a lame horse. Ann Surg. 2010;251:766–71.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, Strasberg SM. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:286–98.CrossRefPubMed Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, Strasberg SM. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:286–98.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The ACCORDION severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250:177–86.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The ACCORDION severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250:177–86.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Enomoto LM, Hollenbeak CS, Bhayani NH, Dillon PW, Gusani NJ. Measuring surgical quality: a national clinical registry versus administrative claims data. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1416–22.CrossRefPubMed Enomoto LM, Hollenbeak CS, Bhayani NH, Dillon PW, Gusani NJ. Measuring surgical quality: a national clinical registry versus administrative claims data. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1416–22.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Pezzi CM, Mallin K, Loomis AM, Winchester DP. The 90-day mortality after pancreatectomy for cancer is double the 30-day mortality: more than 20,000 resections from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4059–67.CrossRefPubMed Swanson RS, Pezzi CM, Mallin K, Loomis AM, Winchester DP. The 90-day mortality after pancreatectomy for cancer is double the 30-day mortality: more than 20,000 resections from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4059–67.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Piccirillo JF, Tierney RM, Costas I, Grove L, Spitznagel EL Jr. Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA. 26 2004;291:2441–7.CrossRef Piccirillo JF, Tierney RM, Costas I, Grove L, Spitznagel EL Jr. Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA. 26 2004;291:2441–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:833–46; discussion 846–838.CrossRefPubMed Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:833–46; discussion 846–838.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Katz MH, Wang H, Balachandran A, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:68–78; discussion 78–69.CrossRefPubMed Katz MH, Wang H, Balachandran A, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:68–78; discussion 78–69.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest. 2004;8:935–49; discussion 949–950.CrossRef Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest. 2004;8:935–49; discussion 949–950.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Katz MH, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Skoracki R, Tamm E, Fleming JB. Retroperitoneal dissection in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: operative principles and techniques. J A Coll Surg. 2012;215:e11–8.CrossRefPubMed Katz MH, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Skoracki R, Tamm E, Fleming JB. Retroperitoneal dissection in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: operative principles and techniques. J A Coll Surg. 2012;215:e11–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761–8.CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251–67.CrossRefPubMed Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251–67.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH. The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–194.CrossRefPubMed Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH. The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–194.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gawlas I, Sethi M, Winner M, et al. Readmission after pancreatic resection is not an appropriate measure of quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1781–7.CrossRefPubMed Gawlas I, Sethi M, Winner M, et al. Readmission after pancreatic resection is not an appropriate measure of quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1781–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. The burden of infection for elective pancreatic resections. Surgery. 2013;153:86–94.CrossRefPubMed Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. The burden of infection for elective pancreatic resections. Surgery. 2013;153:86–94.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1597–605.CrossRefPubMed Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1597–605.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:655–62.CrossRefPubMed Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:655–62.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Van Buren G II, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, et al. A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg. 2014;259:605–12.CrossRefPubMed Van Buren G II, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, et al. A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg. 2014;259:605–12.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Baker MS, Sherman KL, Stocker SJ, et al. Using a modification of the Clavien-Dindo system accounting for readmissions and multiple interventions: defining quality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:400–6.CrossRefPubMed Baker MS, Sherman KL, Stocker SJ, et al. Using a modification of the Clavien-Dindo system accounting for readmissions and multiple interventions: defining quality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:400–6.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Vollmer CM, Jr., Lewis RS, Hall BL, et al. Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the ACCORDION Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index. Ann Surg. 2014. Vollmer CM, Jr., Lewis RS, Hall BL, et al. Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the ACCORDION Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index. Ann Surg. 2014.
34.
go back to reference Ansorge C, Nordin JZ, Lundell L, et al. Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:100–8.CrossRefPubMed Ansorge C, Nordin JZ, Lundell L, et al. Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:100–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:519–31.PubMed Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:519–31.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Epelboym I, Gawlas I, Lee JA, Schrope B, Chabot JA, Allendorf JD. Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module. World J Surg. 2014;38:1461–7.CrossRefPubMed Epelboym I, Gawlas I, Lee JA, Schrope B, Chabot JA, Allendorf JD. Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module. World J Surg. 2014;38:1461–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Forster AJ, Worthington JR, Hawken S, et al. Using prospective clinical surveillance to identify adverse events in hospital. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:756–63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Forster AJ, Worthington JR, Hawken S, et al. Using prospective clinical surveillance to identify adverse events in hospital. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:756–63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Grocott MP, Browne JP, Van der Meulen J, et al. The Postoperative Morbidity Survey was validated and used to describe morbidity after major surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:919–28.CrossRefPubMed Grocott MP, Browne JP, Van der Meulen J, et al. The Postoperative Morbidity Survey was validated and used to describe morbidity after major surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:919–28.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Sanford DE, Woolsey CA, Hall BL, et al. Variations in definition and method of retrieval of complications influence outcomes statistics after pancreatoduodenectomy: comparison of NSQIP with non-NSQIP methods. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219(3):407–415.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sanford DE, Woolsey CA, Hall BL, et al. Variations in definition and method of retrieval of complications influence outcomes statistics after pancreatoduodenectomy: comparison of NSQIP with non-NSQIP methods. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219(3):407–415.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and interrater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:6–16.CrossRefPubMed Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and interrater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:6–16.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kartha A, Restuccia JD, Burgess JF Jr, et al. Nurse practitioner and physician assistant scope of practice in 118 acute care hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2014;9:615–20.CrossRefPubMed Kartha A, Restuccia JD, Burgess JF Jr, et al. Nurse practitioner and physician assistant scope of practice in 118 acute care hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2014;9:615–20.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Active Surveillance for Adverse Events Within 90 Days: The Standard for Reporting Surgical Outcomes After Pancreatectomy
Authors
Lilian Schwarz, MD
Morgan Bruno, RN, MS, ACNP-BC
Nathan H. Parker, MPH
Laura Prakash, MD
Yoshihiro Mise, MD, PhD
Jeffrey E. Lee, MD
Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, MD
Thomas A. Aloia, MD
Claudius Conrad, MD, PhD
Jason B. Fleming, MD
Matthew H. G. Katz, MD
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4437-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2015 Go to the issue