Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2014

01-12-2014 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

The 90-Day Mortality After Pancreatectomy for Cancer Is Double the 30-Day Mortality: More than 20,000 Resections From the National Cancer Data Base

Authors: Richard S. Swanson, MD, FACS, Christopher M. Pezzi, MD, FACS, Katherine Mallin, PhD, Ashley M. Loomis, MPH, David P. Winchester, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Operative mortality traditionally has been defined as the rate within 30 days or during the initial hospitalization, and studies that established the volume–outcome relationship for pancreatectomy used similar definitions.

Methods

Pancreatectomies reported to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) during 2007–2010 were examined for 30- and 90-day mortality. Unadjusted mortality rates were compared by type of resection, stage, comorbidities, and average annual hospital volume. Hierarchical logistic regression models generated risk-adjusted odds ratios for 30- and 90-day mortality.

Results

After 21,482 pancreatectomies, the unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was 3.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.4–3.9 %), which doubled at 90 days to 7.4 % (95 % CI 7.0–7.8). The unadjusted and risk-adjusted mortality rates were higher at 30 days with increasing age, increasing stage, male gender, lower income, low hospital volume, resections other than distal pancreatectomy, Medicare or Medicaid insurance coverage, residence in a Southern census division, history of prior cancer, and multiple comorbidities. The lowest-volume hospitals (<5 per year) performed 19 % of the pancreatectomies, with a risk-adjusted odds ratios for mortality that were 4.2 times higher (95 % CI 3.1–5.8) at 30 days and remained 1.9 times higher (95 % CI 1.5–2.3) at 30–90 days compared with hospitals that had high volumes (≥40 per year).

Conclusion

Mortality rates within 90 days after pancreatic resection are double those at 30 days. The volume–outcome relationship persists in the NCDB. Reporting mortality rates 90 days after pancreatectomy is important. Hospitals should be aware of their annual volume and mortality rates 30 and 90 days after pancreatectomy and should benchmark the use of high-volume hospitals.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:638–45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:638–45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gordon TA, Burleyson, GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995;221: 43–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gordon TA, Burleyson, GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995;221: 43–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med. 1996;165:294–300.PubMedCentralPubMed Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med. 1996;165:294–300.PubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kotwall CA, Maxwell JG, Brinker CC, Koch GG, Covington DL. National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:847–54.PubMedCrossRef Kotwall CA, Maxwell JG, Brinker CC, Koch GG, Covington DL. National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:847–54.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Simunovic M, To T, Theriault M, Langer B. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. CMAJ. 1999;160:643–8.PubMedCentralPubMed Simunovic M, To T, Theriault M, Langer B. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. CMAJ. 1999;160:643–8.PubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Killeen SD, O’Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg. 2005;92:389–402.PubMedCrossRef Killeen SD, O’Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg. 2005;92:389–402.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Janes RH, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, Winchester DP, Ocwieja KC, Karnell LH, Clive RE, Menck HR. National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer: results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. Ann Surg. 1996;223:261–72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Janes RH, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, Winchester DP, Ocwieja KC, Karnell LH, Clive RE, Menck HR. National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer: results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. Ann Surg. 1996;223:261–72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Steiner, C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.PubMedCrossRef Elixhauser A, Steiner, C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lieffers JR, Baracos VE, Winget M, Fassbender K. A comparison of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity measures to predict colorectal cancer survival using administrative health data. Cancer. 2011;117:1957–65.PubMedCrossRef Lieffers JR, Baracos VE, Winget M, Fassbender K. A comparison of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity measures to predict colorectal cancer survival using administrative health data. Cancer. 2011;117:1957–65.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Southern DA, Quan H, Ghali WA. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care. 2004;42:355–60.PubMedCrossRef Southern DA, Quan H, Ghali WA. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care. 2004;42:355–60.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The 90-Day Mortality After Pancreatectomy for Cancer Is Double the 30-Day Mortality: More than 20,000 Resections From the National Cancer Data Base
Authors
Richard S. Swanson, MD, FACS
Christopher M. Pezzi, MD, FACS
Katherine Mallin, PhD
Ashley M. Loomis, MPH
David P. Winchester, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4036-4

Other articles of this Issue 13/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2014 Go to the issue