Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Melanomas

Staging Studies for Cutaneous Melanoma in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis

Authors: Nabil Wasif, MD, MPH, David Etzioni, MD, MS, Dana Haddad, MD, PhD, Richard J. Gray, MD, Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD, Barbara A. Pockaj, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Routine cross-sectional imaging for staging of early-stage cutaneous melanoma is not recommended. This study sought to investigate the use of imaging for staging of cutaneous melanoma in the United States.

Methods

Patients with nonmetastatic cutaneous melanoma newly diagnosed between 2000 and 2007 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results-Medicare registry. Any imaging study performed within 90 days after diagnosis was considered a staging study.

Results

The study identified 25,643 patients, 3,116 (12.2 %) of whom underwent cross-sectional imaging: positron emission tomography (PET) (7.2 %), computed tomography (CT) (5.9 %), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.6 %). From 2000 to 2007, the use of cross-sectional imaging increased from 8.7 to 16.1 % (p < 0.001), driven predominantly by increased usage of PET (4.2–12.1 %). Stratification by T and N classification showed that cross-sectional imaging was used for 8.6 % of T1, 14.3 % of T2, 18.6 % of T3, and 26.7 % of T4 tumors (p < 0.001) and for 33.3 % of node-positive patients versus 11.1 % of node-negative patients (p < 0.001). Factors predictive of cross-sectional imaging included T classification [odds ratio (OR) for T4 vs T1, 2.66; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.33–3.03], node positivity (OR 2.70; 95 % CI 2.36–3.10), more recent year of diagnosis (OR 2.05 for 2007 vs 2000; 95 % CI 1.74–2.42), atypical histology, and non-Caucasian race (OR 1.32; 95 % CI 1.02–1.73).

Conclusions

The use of cross-sectional imaging for staging of early-stage cutaneous melanoma is increasing in the Medicare population. Better dissemination of guidelines and judicious use of imaging should be encouraged.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Choi WW, Williams SB, Gu X, et al. Overuse of imaging for staging low risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011;185:1645–9.CrossRefPubMed Choi WW, Williams SB, Gu X, et al. Overuse of imaging for staging low risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011;185:1645–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Crivello ML, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Advanced imaging modalities in early-stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:102–10.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Crivello ML, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Advanced imaging modalities in early-stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:102–10.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.CrossRefPubMed Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bichakjian CK, Halpern AC, Johnson TM, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:1032–47.CrossRefPubMed Bichakjian CK, Halpern AC, Johnson TM, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:1032–47.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yancovitz M, Finelt N, Warycha MA, et al. Role of radiologic imaging at the time of initial diagnosis of stage T1b–T3b melanoma. Cancer. 2007;110:1107–14.CrossRefPubMed Yancovitz M, Finelt N, Warycha MA, et al. Role of radiologic imaging at the time of initial diagnosis of stage T1b–T3b melanoma. Cancer. 2007;110:1107–14.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Clark PB, Soo V, Kraas J, et al. Futility of fluorodeoxyglucose F-18 positron emission tomography in initial evaluation of patients with T2 to T4 melanoma. Arch Surg. 2006;141:284–8.CrossRefPubMed Clark PB, Soo V, Kraas J, et al. Futility of fluorodeoxyglucose F-18 positron emission tomography in initial evaluation of patients with T2 to T4 melanoma. Arch Surg. 2006;141:284–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, et al. Inefficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scans for initial evaluation in early-stage cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2005;104:570–9.CrossRefPubMed Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, et al. Inefficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scans for initial evaluation in early-stage cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2005;104:570–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Havener L. Standards for cancer registries volume III: standards for completeness, quality, analysis, and management of data. North American Association of Central Cancer Registeries; 2004. Havener L. Standards for cancer registries volume III: standards for completeness, quality, analysis, and management of data. North American Association of Central Cancer Registeries; 2004.
11.
go back to reference Maubec E, Lumbroso J, Masson F, et al. F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan in the initial evaluation of patients with a primary melanoma thicker than 4 mm. Melanoma Res. 2007;17:147–54.CrossRefPubMed Maubec E, Lumbroso J, Masson F, et al. F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan in the initial evaluation of patients with a primary melanoma thicker than 4 mm. Melanoma Res. 2007;17:147–54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Miranda EP, Gertner M, Wall J, et al. Routine imaging of asymptomatic melanoma patients with metastasis to sentinel lymph nodes rarely identifies systemic disease. Arch Surg. 2004;139:831–6.CrossRefPubMed Miranda EP, Gertner M, Wall J, et al. Routine imaging of asymptomatic melanoma patients with metastasis to sentinel lymph nodes rarely identifies systemic disease. Arch Surg. 2004;139:831–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Aloia TA, Gershenwald JE, Andtbacka RH, et al. Utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging staging before completion lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2858–65.CrossRefPubMed Aloia TA, Gershenwald JE, Andtbacka RH, et al. Utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging staging before completion lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2858–65.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Staging Studies for Cutaneous Melanoma in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis
Authors
Nabil Wasif, MD, MPH
David Etzioni, MD, MS
Dana Haddad, MD, PhD
Richard J. Gray, MD
Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD
Barbara A. Pockaj, MD
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4268-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2015 Go to the issue