Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Breast Oncology

MRI Volumetric Analysis of Breast Fibroglandular Tissue to Assess Risk of the Spared Nipple in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Authors: Heather L. Baltzer, MSc, MD, Olivier Alonzo-Proulx, PhD, James G. Mainprize, PhD, Martin J. Yaffe, MSc, PhD, Kelly A. Metcalfe, RN, PhD, Steve A. Narod, MD, FRCPC, FRSC, Ellen Warner, MD, FRCPC, FACP, MSc, John L. Semple, MD, MSc, FRCS(C), FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Prophylactic nipple-areolar complex (NAC)-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is controversial over concern regarding residual fibroglandular tissue (FGT) with malignant potential. The objective of this study was to model the volume of FGT in the NAC at a standard retroareolar margin (5 mm) and examine the change in this amount with a greater retroareolar margin or areola-sparing technique.

Methods

A segmentation protocol was applied to breast MRIs from 105 BRCA1/2 patients to quantify volumes of FGT for total breast and NAC. The proportion of FGT in the NAC relative to the breast was calculated as the primary outcome and was compared for 5 mm versus 10 mm retroareolar depths. The proportion of FGT in the areola was compared with the NAC.

Results

At 5 mm retroareolar thickness, residual NAC FGT comprised 1.3 % of the total breast FGT. This amount was not significantly greater than the proportion in the areola (p = 0.3, d = 0.1). Increasing the retroareolar thickness to 10 mm led to a statistically and possibly clinically significant increase in the amount of NAC FGT (p < 0.001, d = 1.1).

Conclusions

The proportion of FGT remaining in the spared NAC with a 5 mm margin is extremely small, suggesting that leaving the entire NAC would create very little added risk. Doubling the retroareolar margin may translate into a clinically meaningful increase. Overall, our findings support the safety of the current trend toward increased rates of prophylactic NSM performed in this high-risk population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The breast cancer linkage consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):676–89.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The breast cancer linkage consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):676–89.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, Frank TS, Soderberg CL, Sitta DL, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(21):1633–7.PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, Frank TS, Soderberg CL, Sitta DL, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(21):1633–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kaas R, Verhoef S, Wesseling J, Rookus MA, Oldenburg HS, Peeters MJ, et al. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Very low risk for subsequent breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):488–92.PubMedCrossRef Kaas R, Verhoef S, Wesseling J, Rookus MA, Oldenburg HS, Peeters MJ, et al. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Very low risk for subsequent breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):488–92.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MB, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):159–64.PubMedCrossRef Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MB, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):159–64.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Semple J, Metcalfe KA, Lynch HT, Kim-Sing C, Senter L, Pal T, et al. International rates of breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(12):3817–22.PubMedCrossRef Semple J, Metcalfe KA, Lynch HT, Kim-Sing C, Senter L, Pal T, et al. International rates of breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(12):3817–22.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, Styblo TM, Moore B, Bried JT, Murray DR, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):570–5; discussion 575-8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, Styblo TM, Moore B, Bried JT, Murray DR, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):570–5; discussion 575-8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Craig ES, Walker ME, Salomon J, Fusi S. Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap in areola-sparing mastectomy. Microsurgery. 2013;33(2):125–9.PubMedCrossRef Craig ES, Walker ME, Salomon J, Fusi S. Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap in areola-sparing mastectomy. Microsurgery. 2013;33(2):125–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3117–22.PubMedCrossRef de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3117–22.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Didier F, Arnaboldi P, Gandini S, Maldifassi A, Goldhirsch A, Radice D, et al. Why do women accept to undergo a nipple sparing mastectomy or to reconstruct the nipple areola complex when nipple sparing mastectomy is not possible? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(3):1177–84.PubMedCrossRef Didier F, Arnaboldi P, Gandini S, Maldifassi A, Goldhirsch A, Radice D, et al. Why do women accept to undergo a nipple sparing mastectomy or to reconstruct the nipple areola complex when nipple sparing mastectomy is not possible? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(3):1177–84.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Lohsiriwat V, Rey P, Curigliano G, Martella S, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy–is it worth the risk? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(12):742–7.PubMedCrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, Lohsiriwat V, Rey P, Curigliano G, Martella S, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy–is it worth the risk? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(12):742–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sinno H, Izadpanah A, Thibaudeau S, Christodoulou G, Lin SJ, Dionisopoulos T. An objective assessment of the perceived quality of life of living with bilateral mastectomy defect. Breast. 2013;22(2):168–72.PubMedCrossRef Sinno H, Izadpanah A, Thibaudeau S, Christodoulou G, Lin SJ, Dionisopoulos T. An objective assessment of the perceived quality of life of living with bilateral mastectomy defect. Breast. 2013;22(2):168–72.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.PubMedCrossRef Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, Pavri S, Firouz J, Bernard S, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):818–29.PubMedCrossRef Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, Pavri S, Firouz J, Bernard S, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):818–29.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(5):699–704.PubMedCrossRef Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(5):699–704.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA. Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast-cancer prevention? Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(6):431–4.PubMedCrossRef Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA. Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast-cancer prevention? Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(6):431–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):457–63; discussion 464–5.PubMedCrossRef Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):457–63; discussion 464–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Reynolds C, Davidson JA, Lindor NM, Glazebrook KN, Jakub JW, Degnim AC, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: can the nipple be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3102–9.PubMedCrossRef Reynolds C, Davidson JA, Lindor NM, Glazebrook KN, Jakub JW, Degnim AC, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: can the nipple be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3102–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):77–84.PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):77–84.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, Cocilovo C, Sidawy M, Al-Attar A, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1005–14.PubMedCrossRef Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, Cocilovo C, Sidawy M, Al-Attar A, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1005–14.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Temple WJ, Lindsay RL, Magi E, Urbanski SJ. Technical considerations for prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high risk for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1991;161(4):413–5.PubMedCrossRef Temple WJ, Lindsay RL, Magi E, Urbanski SJ. Technical considerations for prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high risk for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1991;161(4):413–5.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, Singletary SE, Ames FC. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(3):193–7.PubMedCrossRef Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, Singletary SE, Ames FC. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(3):193–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ma G, Richardson H, Pacella SJ, Codner MA. Single-stage breast reconstruction following areola-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(5):1414–7.PubMedCrossRef Ma G, Richardson H, Pacella SJ, Codner MA. Single-stage breast reconstruction following areola-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(5):1414–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Simmons RM, Hollenbeck ST, Latrenta GS. Two-year follow-up of areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4):403–6.PubMedCrossRef Simmons RM, Hollenbeck ST, Latrenta GS. Two-year follow-up of areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4):403–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Simmons RM, Hollenbeck ST, Latrenta GS. Areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51(6):547–51.PubMedCrossRef Simmons RM, Hollenbeck ST, Latrenta GS. Areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51(6):547–51.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Schnitt SJ, Goldwyn RM, Slavin SA. Mammary ducts in the areola: implications for patients undergoing reconstructive surgery of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(7):1290–3.PubMed Schnitt SJ, Goldwyn RM, Slavin SA. Mammary ducts in the areola: implications for patients undergoing reconstructive surgery of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(7):1290–3.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Stolier AJ, Grube BJ. Areola-sparing mastectomy: defining the risks. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(1):118–24.PubMedCrossRef Stolier AJ, Grube BJ. Areola-sparing mastectomy: defining the risks. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(1):118–24.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec Z. Has the time come to change the breast-conserving treatment for skin and nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):1043–4; author reply 1044–5.PubMedCrossRef Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec Z. Has the time come to change the breast-conserving treatment for skin and nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):1043–4; author reply 1044–5.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Maisonneuve P, Rey PC, Baros N, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(2):125–9.PubMedCrossRef Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Maisonneuve P, Rey PC, Baros N, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(2):125–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Harness JK, Vetter TS, Salibian AH. Areola and nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment and risk reduction: report of an initial experience in a community hospital setting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(4):917–22.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Harness JK, Vetter TS, Salibian AH. Areola and nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment and risk reduction: report of an initial experience in a community hospital setting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(4):917–22.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, Rietjens M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(1):97–101.PubMedCrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, Rietjens M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(1):97–101.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Stolier AJ, Levine EA. Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J. 2013;19(2):173–9.PubMedCrossRef Stolier AJ, Levine EA. Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J. 2013;19(2):173–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1341–7.PubMedCrossRef Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1341–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 June;18(6):1665–70.PubMedCrossRef Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 June;18(6):1665–70.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Passaperuma K, Warner E, Causer PA, Hill KA, Messner S, Wong JW, et al. Long-term results of screening with magnetic resonance imaging in women with BRCA mutations. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(1):24–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Passaperuma K, Warner E, Causer PA, Hill KA, Messner S, Wong JW, et al. Long-term results of screening with magnetic resonance imaging in women with BRCA mutations. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(1):24–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ortiz CG, Martel AL. Automatic atlas-based segmentation of the breast in MRI for 3D breast volume computation. Med Phys. 2012;39(10):5835–48.PubMedCrossRef Ortiz CG, Martel AL. Automatic atlas-based segmentation of the breast in MRI for 3D breast volume computation. Med Phys. 2012;39(10):5835–48.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Thompson DJ, Leach MO, Kwan-Lim G, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Warsi I, et al. Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer. The UK MARIBS Study. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(6):R80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Thompson DJ, Leach MO, Kwan-Lim G, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Warsi I, et al. Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer. The UK MARIBS Study. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(6):R80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D. Breast-areola-nipple proportion. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(5):510–3.PubMedCrossRef Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D. Breast-areola-nipple proportion. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(5):510–3.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Sanuki J, Fukuma E, Uchida Y. Morphologic study of nipple-areola complex in 600 breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):295–7.PubMedCrossRef Sanuki J, Fukuma E, Uchida Y. Morphologic study of nipple-areola complex in 600 breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):295–7.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Murthy V, Chamberlain RS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in modern breast practice. Clin Anat. 2013;26(1):56–65.PubMedCrossRef Murthy V, Chamberlain RS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in modern breast practice. Clin Anat. 2013;26(1):56–65.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Livingston EH, Elliot A, Hynan L, Cao J. Effect size estimation: a necessary component of statistical analysis. Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):706–12.PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH, Elliot A, Hynan L, Cao J. Effect size estimation: a necessary component of statistical analysis. Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):706–12.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI Volumetric Analysis of Breast Fibroglandular Tissue to Assess Risk of the Spared Nipple in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Authors
Heather L. Baltzer, MSc, MD
Olivier Alonzo-Proulx, PhD
James G. Mainprize, PhD
Martin J. Yaffe, MSc, PhD
Kelly A. Metcalfe, RN, PhD
Steve A. Narod, MD, FRCPC, FRSC
Ellen Warner, MD, FRCPC, FACP, MSc
John L. Semple, MD, MSc, FRCS(C), FACS
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3532-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2014 Go to the issue