Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013

01-10-2013 | Breast Oncology

Is Postexcision, Preradiation Mammogram Necessary in Patients After Breast-Conserving Surgery with Negative Margins

Authors: Cameron D. Adkisson, MD, Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD, FACS, Laura A. Vallow, MD, Michael G. Heckman, HS, Nancy N. Diehl, BS, Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD, Nicholas Howe, BS, Tammeza Gibson, PA, Barbara Pockaj, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In women with breast cancer and calcifications, controversy exists over the need for postexcision/lumpectomy, preradiation mammogram (PEM) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Further, the need for excision of remaining or suspicious calcifications after PEM when surgical margins are negative is unclear. We sought to characterize the utility of PEM hypothesizing that its value in directing the need for additional surgery is minimized after achieving negative surgical margins.

Methods

We identified 524 women with breast cancer and calcifications treated with BCS with negative margins between 1996 and 2011.

Results

PEM was performed in 112 of 524 (21 %) women, with residual calcifications identified in 10 of 112 (9 %); of these, 2 of 112 (1.8 %) had residual disease. Local recurrence occurred in 4 of 112 (4 %) patients, none of whom had residual calcifications identified on PEM. The remaining 412 of 524 (79 %) women did not have PEM but had a postradiation mammogram 6 to 12 months after treatment identifying calcifications in 19 (5 %) women. Tissue diagnosis was benign in 14 women and was not pursued in the remaining 5. Local recurrence occurred in 13 (3 %) patients, none of whom had calcifications on the new post radiation baseline mammogram.

Conclusions

Mammographically apparent calcifications representing residual disease occur infrequently after BCS with negative margins. The value of PEM may be to document the new radiographic baseline but should not be required to ensure adequate surgery. Radiation plays an integral role in sterilization of the remaining breast tissue after BCS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aref A, Youssef E, Washington T, Segel M, Grigorian C, Bongers S et al. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspicious microcalcifications. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6:25–7.PubMed Aref A, Youssef E, Washington T, Segel M, Grigorian C, Bongers S et al. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspicious microcalcifications. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6:25–7.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Dershaw D. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:309–16.PubMedCrossRef Dershaw D. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:309–16.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dershaw DD. Evaluation of the breast undergoing lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:1147–60.PubMed Dershaw DD. Evaluation of the breast undergoing lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:1147–60.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Winchester D, Strom E. Standards for diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast—American College of Radiology—American College of Surgeons—College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:108–28.PubMedCrossRef Winchester D, Strom E. Standards for diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast—American College of Radiology—American College of Surgeons—College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:108–28.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Grann A, Abdou C, Dragman N, Goodman R. The value of postexcision preradiation mammography in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2004;27:285–8.PubMedCrossRef Grann A, Abdou C, Dragman N, Goodman R. The value of postexcision preradiation mammography in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2004;27:285–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lin K, Eradat J, Mehta N, Bent C, Lee S, Apple S et al. Is a short-interval postradiation mammogram necessary after conservative surgery and radiation in breast cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:1041–7.PubMedCrossRef Lin K, Eradat J, Mehta N, Bent C, Lee S, Apple S et al. Is a short-interval postradiation mammogram necessary after conservative surgery and radiation in breast cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:1041–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Degnim A, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim A, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Habermann E, Abbott A, Parsons H, Virnig B, Al-Refaie W, Tuttle T. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437–41.PubMedCrossRef Habermann E, Abbott A, Parsons H, Virnig B, Al-Refaie W, Tuttle T. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437–41.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Adkisson C, Bagaria S, Parker A, et al. Which eligible breast conservation patients choose mastectomy in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1129–36.PubMedCrossRef Adkisson C, Bagaria S, Parker A, et al. Which eligible breast conservation patients choose mastectomy in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1129–36.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Khatcheressian J, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow–up and management after primary treatment: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1–6.CrossRef Khatcheressian J, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow–up and management after primary treatment: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Breast Cancer. Version 3.2013. 2013;National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Breast Cancer. Version 3.2013. 2013;National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
12.
go back to reference Hasselgren P, Hummel R, Georgian-Smith D, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery. 1993;114:836–40.PubMed Hasselgren P, Hummel R, Georgian-Smith D, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery. 1993;114:836–40.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Waddell B, Stomper P, DeFazio J, Hurd T, Edge S. Postexcision mammography is indicated after resection of ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:665–8.PubMedCrossRef Waddell B, Stomper P, DeFazio J, Hurd T, Edge S. Postexcision mammography is indicated after resection of ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:665–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Teixidor H, Chu F, Kim Y, Levin T. The value of mammography after limited breast surgery and before definitive radiation therapy. Cancer. 1992;69:1418–23.PubMedCrossRef Teixidor H, Chu F, Kim Y, Levin T. The value of mammography after limited breast surgery and before definitive radiation therapy. Cancer. 1992;69:1418–23.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gluck B, Dershaw D, Liberman L, Deutch B. Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Radiology. 1993;188:469–72.PubMed Gluck B, Dershaw D, Liberman L, Deutch B. Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Radiology. 1993;188:469–72.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Holland R, Veling S, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.PubMedCrossRef Holland R, Veling S, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dunne C, Burke J, Morrow M, Kell M. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1615–20.PubMedCrossRef Dunne C, Burke J, Morrow M, Kell M. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1615–20.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rudloff U, Brogi E, Reiner A, et al. The influence of margin width and volume of disease near margin on benefit of radiation therapy for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:583–91.PubMedCrossRef Rudloff U, Brogi E, Reiner A, et al. The influence of margin width and volume of disease near margin on benefit of radiation therapy for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:583–91.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Silverstein M, Lagios M, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1455–61.PubMedCrossRef Silverstein M, Lagios M, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1455–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is Postexcision, Preradiation Mammogram Necessary in Patients After Breast-Conserving Surgery with Negative Margins
Authors
Cameron D. Adkisson, MD
Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD, FACS
Laura A. Vallow, MD
Michael G. Heckman, HS
Nancy N. Diehl, BS
Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD
Nicholas Howe, BS
Tammeza Gibson, PA
Barbara Pockaj, MD
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3148-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013 Go to the issue