Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Breast Oncology

Which Eligible Breast Conservation Patients Choose Mastectomy in the Setting of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer?

Authors: Cameron D. Adkisson, MD, Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD, Alexander S. Parker, PhD, Jillian M. Bray, MD, MPH, Tammeza Gibson, PA, Colleen S. Thomas, MS, Michael G. Heckman, MS, Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy offer equivalent survival for women with newly diagnosed breast cancer (BrCa). Despite this, many women eligible for BCT elect mastectomy. Herein, we identify factors associated with choosing ipsilateral mastectomy instead of BCT when mastectomy is not required.

Methods

Between July 2007 and June 2010, 520 women with BrCa were treated by a single surgeon who prospectively documented patient eligibility for BCT. For patients who did not require mastectomy (n = 392), we evaluated associations between treatment choice and potential predictors using odds ratios (ORs) obtained from multivariable logistic regression models. P values ≤0.0029 were significant after correction for multiple testing.

Results

Of 392 women eligible for BCT, 106 (27%) chose mastectomy and 286 (73%) chose BCT. Multivariate analysis found an increased likelihood of electing mastectomy over BCT for patients with no comorbidities (OR 5.4; P < 0.001) and those with previous mastectomy (OR 23.2; P < 0.001). MRI and biopsy findings were associated with treatment choice because patients who had a second-site biopsy positive for cancer in the same quadrant as the index tumor were more likely to elect mastectomy compared with patients with no additional MRI abnormalities (OR 4.3; P = 0.0027). No association existed on multivariate analysis between choice of mastectomy and patient age, family history, or tumor stage.

Conclusions

One in four eligible BCT patients chooses mastectomy. Factors independently associated with choosing mastectomy over BCT include findings of second-site biopsy, previous mastectomy, and absence of comorbidities but not primary tumor characteristics. Further study into a patient’s choice for mastectomy is warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinella N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Cascinella N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bilchert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson J, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life table analysis: Danish breast cancer cooperative group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monog. 1992;19–25. Bilchert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson J, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life table analysis: Danish breast cancer cooperative group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monog. 1992;19–25.
3.
go back to reference Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth DN, et al. Mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and stage II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:976–83.PubMed Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth DN, et al. Mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and stage II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:976–83.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.PubMedCrossRef Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Poggi M, Danforth D, Sciuto L, et al. Eighteen year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer. 2003;98:697–702.PubMedCrossRef Poggi M, Danforth D, Sciuto L, et al. Eighteen year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer. 2003;98:697–702.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391–5.CrossRef National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kiebert GM, deHaes JCJM, van de Velde CJH. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1059–70.PubMed Kiebert GM, deHaes JCJM, van de Velde CJH. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1059–70.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wellisch DK, DiMatteo R, Silverstein M, et al. Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapies: lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Psychosomatics. 1989;30:365–73.PubMedCrossRef Wellisch DK, DiMatteo R, Silverstein M, et al. Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapies: lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Psychosomatics. 1989;30:365–73.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Schag CA, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML, Tan S. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer. 1992;69:1729–38.PubMedCrossRef Ganz PA, Schag CA, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML, Tan S. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer. 1992;69:1729–38.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kemeny MM, Wellisch DK, Schain WS. Psychosocial outcome in a randomized surgical trial for treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer. 1988;62:1231–7.PubMedCrossRef Kemeny MM, Wellisch DK, Schain WS. Psychosocial outcome in a randomized surgical trial for treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer. 1988;62:1231–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, et al. Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(2):501–14.PubMed Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, et al. Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(2):501–14.PubMed
13.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual for Staging of Cancer, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1988. American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual for Staging of Cancer, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1988.
14.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Degnim A, Hoskin TL, Boughley JC, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082–8.PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim A, Hoskin TL, Boughley JC, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Haberman E, Abbott A, Parsons H. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(21):3437–41.CrossRef Haberman E, Abbott A, Parsons H. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(21):3437–41.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Adkisson C, Vallow L, Kowalchik K, et al. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implication. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1678–83.PubMedCrossRef Adkisson C, Vallow L, Kowalchik K, et al. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implication. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1678–83.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Population based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1467–79.PubMedCrossRef Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Population based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1467–79.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hawley S, Griggs J, Hamilton A, et al. Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1–11. Hawley S, Griggs J, Hamilton A, et al. Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1–11.
20.
go back to reference Ward S, Heidrich S, Wolberg W. Factors women take into account when deciding upon type of surgery for breast cancer. Cancer Nursing. 1989;12:344–51.PubMedCrossRef Ward S, Heidrich S, Wolberg W. Factors women take into account when deciding upon type of surgery for breast cancer. Cancer Nursing. 1989;12:344–51.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Du X, Freeman D Jr., Syblik D. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980 s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrite action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62:71–9.PubMedCrossRef Du X, Freeman D Jr., Syblik D. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980 s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrite action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62:71–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pettit K, Swatske M, Gao F, et al. The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: are patients at risk for mastectomy? J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:553–8.PubMedCrossRef Pettit K, Swatske M, Gao F, et al. The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: are patients at risk for mastectomy? J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:553–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Arrington A, Jarosek S, Virnig B, et al. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2697–704.PubMedCrossRef Arrington A, Jarosek S, Virnig B, et al. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2697–704.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dang CM, Zaghigan K, Karlan SR, Phillips EH. Increased use of MRI for breast cancer surveillance and staging is not associated with increased rate of mastectomy. Am Surg. 2009;75(10):937–40.PubMed Dang CM, Zaghigan K, Karlan SR, Phillips EH. Increased use of MRI for breast cancer surveillance and staging is not associated with increased rate of mastectomy. Am Surg. 2009;75(10):937–40.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Carpenter S, Stucky C, Dueck A, et al. The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2009;198(4):475–81.PubMedCrossRef Carpenter S, Stucky C, Dueck A, et al. The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2009;198(4):475–81.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed in all women with newly diagnosed early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(15):290–302.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed in all women with newly diagnosed early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(15):290–302.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dooley WC. Mechanisms of improved outcomes for breast cancer between surgical oncologists and general surgeons. ASO Epub Ahead of Print 2011. Dooley WC. Mechanisms of improved outcomes for breast cancer between surgical oncologists and general surgeons. ASO Epub Ahead of Print 2011.
28.
go back to reference Hershman DL, Buono D, Jacombon JS, et al. Surgeon characteristics and use of breast conserving surgery in women with early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):828–33.PubMedCrossRef Hershman DL, Buono D, Jacombon JS, et al. Surgeon characteristics and use of breast conserving surgery in women with early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):828–33.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Which Eligible Breast Conservation Patients Choose Mastectomy in the Setting of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer?
Authors
Cameron D. Adkisson, MD
Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD
Alexander S. Parker, PhD
Jillian M. Bray, MD, MPH
Tammeza Gibson, PA
Colleen S. Thomas, MS
Michael G. Heckman, MS
Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2080-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2012 Go to the issue