Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2013

01-10-2013 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Commentary to Matsuda et al., Ann Surg Oncol, Sep 18, 2012 [Epub Ahead of Print]

Authors: K. Kodeda, MD, PhD, R. J. Heald, CBE, MChir, FRCS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

We read with interest the article elucidating an important but possibly neglected topic. Since 2008 there have been three meta-analyses published on rectal washout in rectal cancer surgery with comparable numerical differences between washout and no-washout groups.1 3 The first meta-analysis was inconclusive, mainly as a result of a lack of statistical power.1 The two meta-analyses published this year are not hampered by this but to 86 and 92 %, respectively, based on one large study, which is debatable from a methodological point of view.4 However, it is interesting to note that the majority of the other included studies show a similar numerical difference, and the separate analysis without the predominant one also shows a statistical significant difference on the outcome measure.2 The main contribution and novelty of the present meta-analysis to the English-language literature is the inclusion of four studies written in Japanese, whereas only one such article has been included in previous recent meta-analyses. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Constantinides VA, Cheetham D, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis PP. Is rectal washout effective for preventing localized recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1339–44.PubMedCrossRef Constantinides VA, Cheetham D, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis PP. Is rectal washout effective for preventing localized recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1339–44.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Matsuda A, Kishi T, Musso G, et al. The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):856–63.PubMedCrossRef Matsuda A, Kishi T, Musso G, et al. The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):856–63.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, et al. Rectal washout and local recurrence in rectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013;14(11):1313–21.CrossRef Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, et al. Rectal washout and local recurrence in rectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013;14(11):1313–21.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kodeda K, Holmberg E, Jorgren F, Nordgren S, Lindmark G. Rectal washout and local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1589–97.PubMedCrossRef Kodeda K, Holmberg E, Jorgren F, Nordgren S, Lindmark G. Rectal washout and local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1589–97.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Edwards DP, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Long-term results show triple stapling facilitates safe low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis and is associated with low rates of local recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2007;11:17–21.PubMedCrossRef Edwards DP, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Long-term results show triple stapling facilitates safe low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis and is associated with low rates of local recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2007;11:17–21.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO, Reynolds H, et al. International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;201:353–7.PubMedCrossRef Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO, Reynolds H, et al. International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;201:353–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Commentary to Matsuda et al., Ann Surg Oncol, Sep 18, 2012 [Epub Ahead of Print]
Authors
K. Kodeda, MD, PhD
R. J. Heald, CBE, MChir, FRCS
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2951-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2013 Go to the issue