Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Breast Oncology

MRI Utilization in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Survey of Practicing Surgeons

Authors: Anna Parker, MD, Anneke T. Schroen, MD, MPH, David R. Brenin, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Whereas guidelines supporting breast MRI in high-risk screening exist, guidelines for MRI use in newly diagnosed breast cancer are lacking. We, therefore, conducted a study of breast surgeons to determine practice beliefs surrounding MRI use in newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Methods

A survey sent to 2,274 American Society of Breast Surgeons members in December 2010 queried routine MRI use (defined as >75 % of time) in specific clinical scenarios. Analyses were performed by respondent practice setting, practice volume, and practice specialization. Descriptive statistics and subgroup analysis using a χ2 and logistic regression were used.

Results

Responses from 1,012 surgeons (45.5 % response rate) were eligible for analysis. Respondents represented diverse practice settings (20 % academic, 72 % private practice) and volume (≤50 new breast cancer patients, 36 %; 51–100, 26 %; 101–200, 25 %; >200, 13 %). Also, 41 % of surgeons indicated routine MRI use for newly diagnosed patients, with higher rates of use among surgeons from high-volume practices, high specialization, and private practice. Greater consensus in routine MRI use was seen in the setting of extreme mammographic density (87.9 %), strong family history of breast cancer (73.4 %), and invasive lobular carcinoma (69.4 %). Responses were increasingly discordant in setting of pursuing breast conservation (47.4 %), invasive ductal carcinoma (41.8 %), and ductal carcinoma in situ (37.2 %). Personal experience was the most commonly cited influence on MRI use.

Conclusions

Divergent responses in MRI use in newly diagnosed breast cancer reflect clinical uncertainty and variable practice beliefs among breast surgeons. Such diverging practice patterns highlight areas where clinical research and guidelines may be most helpful.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89.PubMedCrossRef Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427–37.PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427–37.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Obdeijn IM, Boetes C, Zonderland HM, Muller SH, et al. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;100:109–19.PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Obdeijn IM, Boetes C, Zonderland HM, Muller SH, et al. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;100:109–19.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Davis PL, McCarty KS, Jr. Sensitivity of enhanced MRI for the detection of breast cancer: new, multicentric, residual, and recurrent. Eur Radiol. 1997;7 Suppl 5:289–98.PubMedCrossRef Davis PL, McCarty KS, Jr. Sensitivity of enhanced MRI for the detection of breast cancer: new, multicentric, residual, and recurrent. Eur Radiol. 1997;7 Suppl 5:289–98.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7; quiz 294–5.PubMedCrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7; quiz 294–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Woodward C, Chambers L. Guide to questionnaire construction and question writing, 3rd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Public Health Association, 1986. Woodward C, Chambers L. Guide to questionnaire construction and question writing, 3rd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Public Health Association, 1986.
10.
go back to reference Dillman D. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: Wiley, 2000. Dillman D. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: Wiley, 2000.
11.
go back to reference Sommer CA, Stitzenberg KB, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Carpenter WR, Carey TS. Breast MRI utilization in older patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;170:77–83.PubMedCrossRef Sommer CA, Stitzenberg KB, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Carpenter WR, Carey TS. Breast MRI utilization in older patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;170:77–83.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P, Maki E, McCready DR. Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3000–9.PubMedCrossRef Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P, Maki E, McCready DR. Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3000–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.PubMedCrossRef Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, Storm RK, Plaisier PW, van Dalen T, et al. Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:879–86.PubMedCrossRef Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, Storm RK, Plaisier PW, van Dalen T, et al. Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:879–86.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290–302.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290–302.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, Harris EE, Schnall MD. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:386–91.PubMedCrossRef Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, Harris EE, Schnall MD. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:386–91.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1224–37.PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1224–37.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Hill AD, Fleming FJ, O’Doherty A, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, et al. Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;191:201–5.PubMedCrossRef Dillon MF, Hill AD, Fleming FJ, O’Doherty A, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, et al. Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;191:201–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, Boetes C. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;107:1–14.PubMedCrossRef Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, Boetes C. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;107:1–14.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sastre-Garau X, Jouve M, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A, Beuzeboc P, Dorval T, et al. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Clinicopathologic analysis of 975 cases with reference to data on conservative therapy and metastatic patterns. Cancer. 1996;77:113–20.PubMedCrossRef Sastre-Garau X, Jouve M, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A, Beuzeboc P, Dorval T, et al. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Clinicopathologic analysis of 975 cases with reference to data on conservative therapy and metastatic patterns. Cancer. 1996;77:113–20.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Santiago RJ, Harris EE, Qin L, Hwang WT, Solin LJ. Similar long-term results of breast-conservation treatment for stage I and II invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 2005;103:2447–54.PubMedCrossRef Santiago RJ, Harris EE, Qin L, Hwang WT, Solin LJ. Similar long-term results of breast-conservation treatment for stage I and II invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 2005;103:2447–54.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference McGhan LJ, Wasif N, Gray RJ, Giurescu ME, Pizzitola VJ, Lorans R, et al. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 3:255–62.PubMedCrossRef McGhan LJ, Wasif N, Gray RJ, Giurescu ME, Pizzitola VJ, Lorans R, et al. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 3:255–62.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T, Bult P, Barentsz JO, Gilhuijs KG, et al. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119:415–22.PubMedCrossRef Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T, Bult P, Barentsz JO, Gilhuijs KG, et al. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119:415–22.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Fenzl G, Hahn D, Krischke I, Edmaier M, Eiermann W, et al. MR imaging of the breast: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:615–20.PubMedCrossRef Heywang SH, Fenzl G, Hahn D, Krischke I, Edmaier M, Eiermann W, et al. MR imaging of the breast: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:615–20.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:199–204.PubMedCrossRef Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:199–204.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kaiser WA. MRM promises earlier breast cancer diagnosis. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1992;14:88–93.PubMed Kaiser WA. MRM promises earlier breast cancer diagnosis. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1992;14:88–93.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, Cluzel P, Janaud G, Finet JF, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;191:625–31.PubMed Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, Cluzel P, Janaud G, Finet JF, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;191:625–31.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Bassett LW, Dhaliwal SG, Eradat J, Khan O, Farria DF, Brenner RJ, et al. National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:332–9.PubMedCrossRef Bassett LW, Dhaliwal SG, Eradat J, Khan O, Farria DF, Brenner RJ, et al. National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:332–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Barringer B. University of Virginia Health System Dept of Revenue Cycle. Personal communication, September, 2011. Barringer B. University of Virginia Health System Dept of Revenue Cycle. Personal communication, September, 2011.
31.
go back to reference Moore SG, Shenoy PJ, Fanucchi L, Tumeh JW, Flowers CR. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:9.PubMedCrossRef Moore SG, Shenoy PJ, Fanucchi L, Tumeh JW, Flowers CR. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.PubMedCrossRef Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, Moe RE, White E. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628–37.PubMedCrossRef Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, Moe RE, White E. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628–37.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI Utilization in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Survey of Practicing Surgeons
Authors
Anna Parker, MD
Anneke T. Schroen, MD, MPH
David R. Brenin, MD
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2934-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2013 Go to the issue