Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Gynecologic Oncology

Robotic Single-site Hysterectomy in Low Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Pilot Study

Authors: Enrico Vizza, MD, PhD, Giacomo Corrado, MD, PhD, Emanuela Mancini, MD, Ermelinda Baiocco, MD, Lodovico Patrizi, MD, PhD, Luana Fabrizi, MD, Luca Colantonio, MD, Monica Cimino, MD, Stefano Sindico, MD, Ester Forastiere, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the feasibility and the safety of robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) in low risk early endometrial cancer.

Methods

Patients with clinical low risk early endometrial cancer were enrolled onto a prospective cohort trial. All surgical procedures were performed through a single 2–2.5 cm umbilical incision, with a multichannel system consisting of a five-lumen port providing access for two single-site instruments (da Vinci Si Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), the 8.5 mm 3D HD endoscope, a 5/10 mm accessory port, and an insufflation adaptor.

Results

Between December 2011 and June 2012, a total of 17 patients were included in our pilot study. The median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 42–84 years), and median body mass index was 26.6 kg/m2 (range, 18–52 kg/m2). One patient was excluded from the study as a result of pelvic metastasis during inspection of abdominal cavity, and another patient was converted to vaginal surgery as a result of problems of hypercapnia. The median docking time, console time, and total operative time was 8 min (range, 5–14 min), 48 min (range, 45–51 min), and 90 min (range, 70–147 min), respectively. The median blood loss was 75 mL (range, 50–150 mL). No laparoscopy/laparotomy conversion was registered. The median time to discharge was 2 days (range, 1–3 days). Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications occurred. At a median of 7.5 months’ follow-up, all patients were disease-free.

Conclusions

RSSH is technically feasible in patients affected by low risk early endometrial cancer. Additional studies with gynecologic oncologic cases should be performed to explore the possible benefits of RSSH.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:271–8.PubMedCrossRef Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:271–8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle S, et al. A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:236–43.PubMedCrossRef Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle S, et al. A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:236–43.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:157–61.PubMedCrossRef Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:157–61.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fanfani F, Rossitto C, Gagliardi ML, et al. Total laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:41–6.PubMedCrossRef Fanfani F, Rossitto C, Gagliardi ML, et al. Total laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:41–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, et al. First human surgery with a novel singleport robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci single-site platform. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3566–73.PubMedCrossRef Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, et al. First human surgery with a novel singleport robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci single-site platform. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3566–73.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines of gynaecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2000;70:207–312.CrossRef FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines of gynaecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2000;70:207–312.CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, et al. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2687–94. Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, et al. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2687–94.
9.
go back to reference White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single site urological surgery: analysis of 50 consecutive cases. J Urol. 2012;187:1696–701.PubMedCrossRef White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single site urological surgery: analysis of 50 consecutive cases. J Urol. 2012;187:1696–701.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Kebria M, Falcone T. Evaluation of a novel single-port robotic platform in the cadaver model for the performance of various procedures in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:380–4.PubMedCrossRef Escobar PF, Kebria M, Falcone T. Evaluation of a novel single-port robotic platform in the cadaver model for the performance of various procedures in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:380–4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Fanfani F, et al. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:552–5.PubMedCrossRef Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Fanfani F, et al. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:552–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:589–91.PubMedCrossRef Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:589–91.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:685–93.PubMedCrossRef Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:685–93.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lau S, Vaknin Z, Ramana-Kumar AV, Halliday D, Franco EL, Gotlieb WH. Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:717–24.PubMedCrossRef Lau S, Vaknin Z, Ramana-Kumar AV, Halliday D, Franco EL, Gotlieb WH. Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:717–24.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic Single-site Hysterectomy in Low Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Pilot Study
Authors
Enrico Vizza, MD, PhD
Giacomo Corrado, MD, PhD
Emanuela Mancini, MD
Ermelinda Baiocco, MD
Lodovico Patrizi, MD, PhD
Luana Fabrizi, MD
Luca Colantonio, MD
Monica Cimino, MD
Stefano Sindico, MD
Ester Forastiere, MD
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2013 Go to the issue