Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2012

01-01-2012

Total laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low-risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study

Authors: Francesco Fanfani, Cristiano Rossitto, Maria Lucia Gagliardi, Valerio Gallotta, Salvatore Gueli Alletti, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Fagotti

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the last few years, technical advances have produced a dramatic shift from traditional open surgery toward a minimally invasive approach, even in oncological procedures. We present our initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in the surgical treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer patients.

Methods

Between July 2009 and May 2010, 20 consecutive low-risk early endometrial cancer patients were enrolled in this single institution prospective cohort trial.

Results

The median age of the patients was 57 years (range = 42–68) and median body mass index was 24 kg/m2 (range = 21–30). Median operative time was 105 min (range = 85–155) and median estimated blood loss was 20 ml (range = 10–180). The larger skin and fascial incision required for the single-port approach was 2.5 cm (median = 2.2 cm; range = 2.0–2.5). No laparoscopic/laparotomic conversion was registered, and no insertion of additional ports was necessary. Median ileus was 16 h (range = 12–20) and median time to discharge was 1 day (range = 1–2). All patients were completely satisfied with the cosmetic results and postoperative pain control.

Conclusions

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery could represent a surgical option for extra-fascial hysterectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer patients, with the potential to further decrease invasiveness of the conventional laparoscopic approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Magrina JP (2005) Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:343–346PubMedCrossRef Magrina JP (2005) Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:343–346PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A (2005) Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 97:4–9PubMedCrossRef Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A (2005) Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 97:4–9PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, Russo T, Zullo F (2009) Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Gynecol Oncol 112:415–421PubMedCrossRef Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, Russo T, Zullo F (2009) Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Gynecol Oncol 112:415–421PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Perone C, Rasile M, Tinelli A (2009) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 112:126–133PubMedCrossRef Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Perone C, Rasile M, Tinelli A (2009) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 112:126–133PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Langerbrekke A, Istre O, Hallqvist AC, Hartgill TW, Onsrud M (2002) Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:152–157CrossRef Langerbrekke A, Istre O, Hallqvist AC, Hartgill TW, Onsrud M (2002) Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:152–157CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cicinelli E, Fiaccavento A, Zaccoletti R, Barbieri F, Tinelli A, Perone C, Cosentino F (2011) Is early stage endometrial cancer safely treated by laparoscopy? Complications of a multicenter study and review of recent literature. Surg Oncol 20(2):80–87PubMedCrossRef Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cicinelli E, Fiaccavento A, Zaccoletti R, Barbieri F, Tinelli A, Perone C, Cosentino F (2011) Is early stage endometrial cancer safely treated by laparoscopy? Complications of a multicenter study and review of recent literature. Surg Oncol 20(2):80–87PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Siesto G, Giudici S, Serati M, Franchi M (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study. Ann Surg Oncol 17:271–278PubMedCrossRef Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Siesto G, Giudici S, Serati M, Franchi M (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study. Ann Surg Oncol 17:271–278PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bandera CA, Magrina JF (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21:25–30PubMedCrossRef Bandera CA, Magrina JF (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21:25–30PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Bocciolone L, Landoni F, Colombo N, Minig L, Sanguineti F, Maggioni A (2009) Robotic surgery: changing the surgical approach for endometrial cancer in a referral cancer center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:427–431PubMedCrossRef Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Bocciolone L, Landoni F, Colombo N, Minig L, Sanguineti F, Maggioni A (2009) Robotic surgery: changing the surgical approach for endometrial cancer in a referral cancer center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:427–431PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Marocco F, Gallotta V, Bottoni C, Scambia G, Fanfani F (2011) Perioperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopy for adnexal disease: a case-control study. Surg Innov 18(1):29–33PubMedCrossRef Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Marocco F, Gallotta V, Bottoni C, Scambia G, Fanfani F (2011) Perioperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopy for adnexal disease: a case-control study. Surg Innov 18(1):29–33PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J (2010) Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:26.e1–26.e6 Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J (2010) Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:26.e1–26.e6
12.
go back to reference Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH (2010) Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2248–2252PubMedCrossRef Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH (2010) Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2248–2252PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Scambia G (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for total hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 109:76–77PubMedCrossRef Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Scambia G (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for total hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 109:76–77PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Starks DC, Fader AN, Barber M, Rojas-Espalliat L (2010) Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis. Gynecol Oncol 119:43–47PubMedCrossRef Escobar PF, Starks DC, Fader AN, Barber M, Rojas-Espalliat L (2010) Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis. Gynecol Oncol 119:43–47PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ramirez PT (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: Is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery? Gynecol Oncol 114:143–144PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: Is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery? Gynecol Oncol 114:143–144PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161PubMedCrossRef Fader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:450–453PubMedCrossRef Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:450–453PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Fader AN, Rasol N (2010) Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1268–1273PubMedCrossRef Escobar PF, Fader AN, Rasol N (2010) Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1268–1273PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Total laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low-risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study
Authors
Francesco Fanfani
Cristiano Rossitto
Maria Lucia Gagliardi
Valerio Gallotta
Salvatore Gueli Alletti
Giovanni Scambia
Anna Fagotti
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1825-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2012 Go to the issue