Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Thoracic Oncology

Staging of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: Comparison of AJCC 6th and 7th Gastric and 7th Esophageal Staging Systems

Authors: Hyoung-Il Kim, MD, Jae-Ho Cheong, MD, Ki Jun Song, PhD, Ji Yeong An, MD, Woo Jin Hyung, MD, Sung Hoon Noh, MD, PhD, Choong Bai Kim, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is currently staged by the esophageal staging criteria according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, 7th edition. We compared the performance of 6th gastric (G6), 7th gastric (G7), and 7th esophageal (E7) staging systems.

Methods

A total of 202 curatively resected adenocarcinomas of EGJ were analyzed. Patient outcomes were assessed according to G6, G7, and E7 staging. Tumor invasion to the subserosal or serosa layer was regarded as invasion to the adventitia for E7 staging. Performance was measured based on monotonicity (decreasing survival with increasing stage), distinctiveness (survival difference between different stages), and homogeneity (homogenous survival in the same stage).

Results

Each staging system was monotonous except for T1-2N0 lesions of E7. This was related to the introduction of histologic grade in E7 staging. Distinctiveness in each staging system was variable. As for the homogeneity, patients whose disease was staged as Ib (E7) exhibited different survival when reassessed by G6 and G7; again, this was related to histologic grading. Patients with IIIb (G7) and IIIc (E7) disease had different survival when reassessed by G6 staging, reflecting the poorer survival of patients with more than 15 lymph node metastases.

Conclusions

Staging of EGJ cancer based on the current AJCC, 7th edition, criteria of esophageal cancer staging has several limitations. We recommend considering modifications of the following in future updates of the staging system: accurate anatomical definition of tumor depth, removal of histologic grade from staging parameters, and classification of more than 15 lymph node metastases as a highly advanced stage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer. 1998;83:2049–53.PubMedCrossRef Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer. 1998;83:2049–53.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Forman D. Review article: oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma—an epidemiological perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20 (Suppl 5):55–60.PubMedCrossRef Forman D. Review article: oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma—an epidemiological perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20 (Suppl 5):55–60.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Greene FL (2002) American Joint Committee on Cancer American Cancer Society AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer. Greene FL (2002) American Joint Committee on Cancer American Cancer Society AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer.
4.
go back to reference Edge SB; American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer, 2010. Edge SB; American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer, 2010.
5.
go back to reference Huang Q, Fan X, Agoston AT, et al. Comparison of gastro-oesophageal junction carcinomas in Chinese versus American patients. HistoPathology. 2011;59:188–97.PubMed Huang Q, Fan X, Agoston AT, et al. Comparison of gastro-oesophageal junction carcinomas in Chinese versus American patients. HistoPathology. 2011;59:188–97.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Huang Q, Shi J, Feng A, et al. Gastric cardiac carcinomas involving the esophagus are more adequately staged as gastric cancers by the 7th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer staging system. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:138–46.PubMedCrossRef Huang Q, Shi J, Feng A, et al. Gastric cardiac carcinomas involving the esophagus are more adequately staged as gastric cancers by the 7th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer staging system. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:138–46.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wang W, Sun XW, Li CF, et al. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results of a Chinese single-institution study of 1,503 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1060–7.PubMedCrossRef Wang W, Sun XW, Li CF, et al. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results of a Chinese single-institution study of 1,503 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1060–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gertler R, Stein HJ, Loos M, Langer R, Friess H, Feith M. How to classify adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: as esophageal or gastric cancer? Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1512–22.PubMedCrossRef Gertler R, Stein HJ, Loos M, Langer R, Friess H, Feith M. How to classify adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: as esophageal or gastric cancer? Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1512–22.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.PubMedCrossRef Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Huang KH, Chen JH, Wu CW, et al. Factors affecting recurrence in node-negative advanced gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol HePatol. 2009;24:1522–6.PubMedCrossRef Huang KH, Chen JH, Wu CW, et al. Factors affecting recurrence in node-negative advanced gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol HePatol. 2009;24:1522–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Takeda J, Koufuji K, Tanaka T, Kodama I, Hashimoto K, Kakegawa T. Retrospective studies of gastric subserosal (ss) cancer—in comparison to pm- and se-cancers. Kurume Med J. 1992;39:83–7.PubMedCrossRef Takeda J, Koufuji K, Tanaka T, Kodama I, Hashimoto K, Kakegawa T. Retrospective studies of gastric subserosal (ss) cancer—in comparison to pm- and se-cancers. Kurume Med J. 1992;39:83–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yamashita K, Sakuramoto S, Katada N, et al. Diffuse type advanced gastric cancer showing dismal prognosis is characterized by deeper invasion and emerging peritoneal cancer cell: the latest comparative study to intestinal advanced gastric cancer. HePatogastroenterology. 2009;56:276–81.PubMed Yamashita K, Sakuramoto S, Katada N, et al. Diffuse type advanced gastric cancer showing dismal prognosis is characterized by deeper invasion and emerging peritoneal cancer cell: the latest comparative study to intestinal advanced gastric cancer. HePatogastroenterology. 2009;56:276–81.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Kobayashi O, Sairenji M, Motohashi H, Noguchi Y. Should scirrhous gastric carcinoma be treated surgically? Clinical experiences with 233 cases and a retrospective analysis of prognosticators. HePatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1509–12.PubMed Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Kobayashi O, Sairenji M, Motohashi H, Noguchi Y. Should scirrhous gastric carcinoma be treated surgically? Clinical experiences with 233 cases and a retrospective analysis of prognosticators. HePatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1509–12.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Staging of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: Comparison of AJCC 6th and 7th Gastric and 7th Esophageal Staging Systems
Authors
Hyoung-Il Kim, MD
Jae-Ho Cheong, MD
Ki Jun Song, PhD
Ji Yeong An, MD
Woo Jin Hyung, MD
Sung Hoon Noh, MD, PhD
Choong Bai Kim, MD
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2898-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2013 Go to the issue