Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Increasing National Mastectomy Rates for the Treatment of Early Stage Breast Cancer

Authors: Usama Mahmood, MD, Alexandra L. Hanlon, PhD, Matthew Koshy, MD, Robert Buras, MD, Saranya Chumsri, MD, Katherine H. Tkaczuk, MD, Sally B. Cheston, MD, William F. Regine, MD, Steven J. Feigenberg, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To study national trends in the mastectomy rate for treatment of early stage breast cancer.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, including 256,081 women diagnosed with T1–2 N0–3 M0 breast cancer from 2000 to 2008. We evaluated therapeutic mastectomy rates by the year of diagnosis and performed a multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine predictors of mastectomy as the treatment choice.

Results

The proportion of women treated with mastectomy decreased from 40.1 to 35.6 % between 2000 and 2005. Subsequently, the mastectomy rate increased to 38.4 % in 2008 (p < 0.0001). Simple logistic regression models demonstrated that mastectomy rates between 2005 and 2008 were moderated by age (p < 0.0001), marital status (p = 0.0230), and geographic location (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that age, race, marital status, geographic location, involvement of multiple regions of the breast, lobular histology, increasing T stage, lymph node positivity, increasing grade, and negative hormone receptor status were independent predictors of mastectomy. Additionally, multivariate analysis confirmed that women diagnosed in 2008 were more likely to undergo mastectomy than women diagnosed in 2005 (odds ratio 1.17, 95 % confidence interval 1.13 to 1.21, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

There is evidence of a reversal in the previously declining national mastectomy rates, with the mastectomy rate reaching a nadir in 2005 and subsequently rising. Further follow-up to confirm this trend and investigation to determine the underlying cause of this trend and its effect on outcomes may be warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C, et al. Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Cancer. 1977;39(6 Suppl):2827–39.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C, et al. Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Cancer. 1977;39(6 Suppl):2827–39.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665–73.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665–73.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:6–11.PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:6–11.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391–5.CrossRef National Institutes of Health consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health consensus development conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628–37.PubMedCrossRef Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health consensus development conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628–37.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Du X, Freeman DH Jr, Syblik DA. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62:71–9.PubMedCrossRef Du X, Freeman DH Jr, Syblik DA. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62:71–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682–90.PubMedCrossRef McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682–90.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437–41.PubMedCrossRef Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437–41.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.PubMedCrossRef Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–7.PubMedCrossRef Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 5th edition. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press; 2000. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 5th edition. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press; 2000.
14.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alpert TE, Haffty BG. Conservative management of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004;5:37–42.PubMedCrossRef Alpert TE, Haffty BG. Conservative management of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004;5:37–42.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Haffty BG. Molecular and genetic markers in the local-regional management of breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2002;12:329–40.PubMedCrossRef Haffty BG. Molecular and genetic markers in the local-regional management of breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2002;12:329–40.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Robson M, Svahn T, McCormick B, et al. Appropriateness of breast-conserving treatment of breast carcinoma in women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a clinic-based series. Cancer. 2005;103:44–51.PubMedCrossRef Robson M, Svahn T, McCormick B, et al. Appropriateness of breast-conserving treatment of breast carcinoma in women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a clinic-based series. Cancer. 2005;103:44–51.PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9.PubMedCrossRef Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7.PubMedCrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563–71.PubMedCrossRef Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563–71.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290–302.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290–302.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Morrow M, Harris JR. More mastectomies: is this what patients really want? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4038–40.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Harris JR. More mastectomies: is this what patients really want? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4038–40.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–83.PubMedCrossRef Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–83.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology. 2007;244:708–17.PubMedCrossRef Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology. 2007;244:708–17.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Hamilton AS, et al. Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1337–47.PubMedCrossRef Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Hamilton AS, et al. Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1337–47.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Balch CM, Jacobs LK. Mastectomies on the rise for breast cancer: “the tide is changing.” Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2669–72.PubMedCrossRef Balch CM, Jacobs LK. Mastectomies on the rise for breast cancer: “the tide is changing.” Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2669–72.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Smith GL, Shih YC, Xu Y et al. Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study. Cancer. 2010;116:734–41.PubMedCrossRef Smith GL, Shih YC, Xu Y et al. Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study. Cancer. 2010;116:734–41.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Increasing National Mastectomy Rates for the Treatment of Early Stage Breast Cancer
Authors
Usama Mahmood, MD
Alexandra L. Hanlon, PhD
Matthew Koshy, MD
Robert Buras, MD
Saranya Chumsri, MD
Katherine H. Tkaczuk, MD
Sally B. Cheston, MD
William F. Regine, MD
Steven J. Feigenberg, MD
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2732-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2013 Go to the issue