Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2009

01-10-2009 | Breast Oncology

Are Mastectomies on the Rise? A 13-Year Trend Analysis of the Selection of Mastectomy Versus Breast Conservation Therapy in 5865 Patients

Authors: Kandace P. McGuire, MD, Alfredo A. Santillan, MD, MPH, Paramjeet Kaur, MD, Tammi Meade, BS, Jateen Parbhoo, BS, Morgan Mathias, Corinne Shamehdi, BS, Michelle Davis, BS, Daniel Ramos, BS, Charles E. Cox, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The equivalency of survival between mastectomy and breast conservation therapy (BCT) has long been established, resulting in two decades of predominant BCT. Recently, surgeons have recognized a trend toward increasing mastectomy. Institutional trends of mastectomy and BCT were reviewed, confirming this perception in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. This report evaluates the factors that influence patient decisions to choose surgical therapies.

Methods

Patients who underwent mastectomy or BCT for invasive and in situ breast cancer were identified upon retrospective review of a prospectively accrued breast cancer database between 1994 and 2007. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of the association between mastectomy and patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics.

Results

Of the 5,865 patients, 3,736 underwent BCT and 2,129 underwent mastectomy. The overall surgical volume decreased during the study period. Mastectomy rates during the periods of 1994–1998, 1999–2003, and 2004–2007 were 33%, 33%, and 44%, respectively (P < 0.01). Immediate reconstruction rates decreased during the same time periods from 16%, 5%, and 7%, respectively (P < 0.01). On logistic regression analysis, gender, age < 40 years, increase tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion were significant independent predictors of mastectomy. The mastectomy rate increased during the period 1999–2003 (OR 1.2) and during 2004–2007(OR 1.8).

Conclusions

The perception of an increasing choice toward mastectomy has been confirmed at this institution. Possible reasons are younger population with higher lifetime risk, higher stage disease, and more biologically aggressive or diffuse tumors. Patient preference, fear of genetic or recurrence risk, and “intangible” factors seem to shift decisions toward mastectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Halsted WS. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46:1–19.PubMedCrossRef Halsted WS. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46:1–19.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer. 2003;98:697–702.CrossRefPubMed Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer. 2003;98:697–702.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Arriagada R, Le MG, Guinebretiere JM, Dunant A, Rochard F, Tursz T. Late local recurrences in a randomised trial comparing conservative treatment with total mastectomy in early breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:1617–22.CrossRefPubMed Arriagada R, Le MG, Guinebretiere JM, Dunant A, Rochard F, Tursz T. Late local recurrences in a randomised trial comparing conservative treatment with total mastectomy in early breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:1617–22.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mameri C, Kemp C, Goldman S, Sobral L, Ajzen S. Impact of breast MRI on surgical treatment, axillary approach, and systemic therapy for breast cancer. Breast J. 2008;14:236–44.CrossRefPubMed Mameri C, Kemp C, Goldman S, Sobral L, Ajzen S. Impact of breast MRI on surgical treatment, axillary approach, and systemic therapy for breast cancer. Breast J. 2008;14:236–44.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bagley FH. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2004;139:380–3.CrossRefPubMed Bagley FH. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2004;139:380–3.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–7.CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.CrossRefPubMed Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:501–7.CrossRefPubMed Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:501–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chan A, Pintilie M, Vallis K, Girourd C, Goss P. Breast cancer in women ≤35 years: review of 1002 cases from a single institution. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:1255–62.CrossRefPubMed Chan A, Pintilie M, Vallis K, Girourd C, Goss P. Breast cancer in women ≤35 years: review of 1002 cases from a single institution. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:1255–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Graves K, Peshkin B, Halbert C, DeMarco T, Isaacs C, Schwartz M. Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;104:321–9.CrossRefPubMed Graves K, Peshkin B, Halbert C, DeMarco T, Isaacs C, Schwartz M. Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;104:321–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tuttle TM. Counseling breast cancer patients on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: the physician’s role. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008;22:545–8. Tuttle TM. Counseling breast cancer patients on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: the physician’s role. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008;22:545–8.
15.
go back to reference Wood WC. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a counterintuitive trend. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008;22:548–51. Wood WC. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a counterintuitive trend. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008;22:548–51.
16.
go back to reference Hiotis K, Ye W, Sposto R, Skinner KA. Predictors of breast conservation therapy. Cancer. 2005;103:892–9.CrossRefPubMed Hiotis K, Ye W, Sposto R, Skinner KA. Predictors of breast conservation therapy. Cancer. 2005;103:892–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Studts JL, Scoggins CR, et al. Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106:1462–6.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar AB, Studts JL, Scoggins CR, et al. Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106:1462–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Neff PT, Bear HD, Pierce CV, et al. Long-term results of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1996;223:709–17.CrossRefPubMed Neff PT, Bear HD, Pierce CV, et al. Long-term results of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1996;223:709–17.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB, et al. Proceedings of the consensus conference on breast conservation, April 28 to May 1, 2005, Milan, Italy. Cancer. 2006;107:242–50.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB, et al. Proceedings of the consensus conference on breast conservation, April 28 to May 1, 2005, Milan, Italy. Cancer. 2006;107:242–50.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference McCahill LE, Privette AR, Hart MR, James TA. Are mastectomy rates a reasonable quality measure of breast cancer surgery? Am J Surg. 2009;197:216–21CrossRefPubMed McCahill LE, Privette AR, Hart MR, James TA. Are mastectomy rates a reasonable quality measure of breast cancer surgery? Am J Surg. 2009;197:216–21CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fancher TT, Palesty JA, Thomas R, et al. A woman’s influence to choose mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2009;153:128–31.CrossRefPubMed Fancher TT, Palesty JA, Thomas R, et al. A woman’s influence to choose mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2009;153:128–31.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tate PS, McGee EM, Hopkins SF, Rogers EL, Page GV. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: patient preferences in a community practice in Kentucky. J Surg Oncol. 1993;52:213–6.CrossRefPubMed Tate PS, McGee EM, Hopkins SF, Rogers EL, Page GV. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: patient preferences in a community practice in Kentucky. J Surg Oncol. 1993;52:213–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cohen L, Hack TF, de Moor C, Katz J, Goss PE. The effects of type of surgery and time on psychological adjustment in women after breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:427–34.CrossRefPubMed Cohen L, Hack TF, de Moor C, Katz J, Goss PE. The effects of type of surgery and time on psychological adjustment in women after breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:427–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yeatman TJ, Lyman GH, Smith SK, Reintgen DS, Cantor AB, Cox CE. Bilaterality and recurrence rates for lobular breast cancer: considerations for treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:198–202.CrossRefPubMed Yeatman TJ, Lyman GH, Smith SK, Reintgen DS, Cantor AB, Cox CE. Bilaterality and recurrence rates for lobular breast cancer: considerations for treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:198–202.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Lewinsky BS, Waisman JR, et al. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Is it different from infiltrating duct carcinoma? Cancer. 1994;73:1673–7.CrossRefPubMed Silverstein MJ, Lewinsky BS, Waisman JR, et al. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Is it different from infiltrating duct carcinoma? Cancer. 1994;73:1673–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Moore MM, Borossa G, Imbrie JZ, et al. Association of infiltrating lobular carcinoma with positive surgical margins after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg. 2000;231:877–82.CrossRefPubMed Moore MM, Borossa G, Imbrie JZ, et al. Association of infiltrating lobular carcinoma with positive surgical margins after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg. 2000;231:877–82.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Furman B, Gardner MS, Romilly P, et al. Effect of 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2003;186:344–7.CrossRefPubMed Furman B, Gardner MS, Romilly P, et al. Effect of 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2003;186:344–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Pediconi F, Catalano C, Padula S, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106:65–74.CrossRefPubMed Pediconi F, Catalano C, Padula S, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106:65–74.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative MRI. J Clin Oncol. (Meeting Abstracts) 2008;26(15 Suppl):509. Katipamula R, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative MRI. J Clin Oncol. (Meeting Abstracts) 2008;26(15 Suppl):509.
32.
go back to reference Lee M, Rogers K, Griffith K, et al. Determinants of breast conservation rates: reasons for mastectomy at a comprehensive cancer center. Breast J. 2009;15:34–40.CrossRefPubMed Lee M, Rogers K, Griffith K, et al. Determinants of breast conservation rates: reasons for mastectomy at a comprehensive cancer center. Breast J. 2009;15:34–40.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.CrossRefPubMed Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1422–9.CrossRefPubMed Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1422–9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Li BDL, Brown WA, Ampil FL, Burton GV, Yu HMD, McDonald JC. Patient compliance is critical for equivalent clinical outcomes for breast cancer treated by breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg. 2000;231:883–9.CrossRefPubMed Li BDL, Brown WA, Ampil FL, Burton GV, Yu HMD, McDonald JC. Patient compliance is critical for equivalent clinical outcomes for breast cancer treated by breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg. 2000;231:883–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, Moe RE, White E. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628-37.CrossRefPubMed Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, Moe RE, White E. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628-37.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Crowe J, Patrick R, Rim A. The importance of preoperative breast MRI for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast J. 2009;15(1):52–60.CrossRefPubMed Crowe J, Patrick R, Rim A. The importance of preoperative breast MRI for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast J. 2009;15(1):52–60.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Gatzemeier W, Liersch T, Stylianou A, Buttler A, Becker H, Fischer U. Präoperative MR-Mammographie beim Mammacarcinom Einfluß auf die operative Behandlung aus chirurgischer Sicht. Der Chirurg. 1999;70(12):1460–8.CrossRef Gatzemeier W, Liersch T, Stylianou A, Buttler A, Becker H, Fischer U. Präoperative MR-Mammographie beim Mammacarcinom Einfluß auf die operative Behandlung aus chirurgischer Sicht. Der Chirurg. 1999;70(12):1460–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Are Mastectomies on the Rise? A 13-Year Trend Analysis of the Selection of Mastectomy Versus Breast Conservation Therapy in 5865 Patients
Authors
Kandace P. McGuire, MD
Alfredo A. Santillan, MD, MPH
Paramjeet Kaur, MD
Tammi Meade, BS
Jateen Parbhoo, BS
Morgan Mathias
Corinne Shamehdi, BS
Michelle Davis, BS
Daniel Ramos, BS
Charles E. Cox, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0635-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2009 Go to the issue