Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2012

Open Access 01-04-2012 | Colorectal Cancer

High Lymph Node Yield is Related to Microsatellite Instability in Colon Cancer

Authors: E. J. Th. Belt, MD, E. A. te Velde, MD, PhD, O. Krijgsman, R. P. M. Brosens, MD, PhD, M. Tijssen, H. F. van Essen, H. B. A. C. Stockmann, MD, PhD, H. Bril, MD, PhD, B. Carvalho, PhD, B. Ylstra, PhD, H. J. Bonjer, MD, PhD, G. A. Meijer, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lymph node (LN) yield in colon cancer resection specimens is an important indicator of treatment quality and has especially in early-stage patients therapeutic implications. However, underlying disease mechanisms, such as microsatellite instability (MSI), may also influence LN yield, as MSI tumors are known to exhibit more prominent lymphocytic antitumor reactions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of LN yield, MSI status, and recurrence rate in colon cancer.

Methods

Clinicopathological data and tumor samples were collected from 332 stage II and III colon cancer patients. DNA was isolated and PCR-based MSI analysis performed. LN yield was defined as “high” when 10 or more LNs were retrieved and “low” in case of fewer than 10 LNs.

Results

Tumors with high LN yield were significantly associated with the MSI phenotype (high LN yield: 26.3% MSI tumors vs low LN yield: 15.1% MSI tumors; P = .01), mainly in stage III disease. Stage II patients with high LN yield had a lower recurrence rate compared with those with low LN yield. Patients with MSI tumors tended to develop fewer recurrences compared with those with MSS tumors, mainly in stage II disease.

Conclusions

In the present study, high LN yield was associated with MSI tumors, mainly in stage III patients. Besides adequate surgery and pathology, high LN yield is possibly a feature caused by biologic behavior of MSI tumors.
Literature
1.
2.
Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley; 2009.
3.
Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, Thomé SD, Alberts SR, Haller DG, et al. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1797–806.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Andre T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, Navarro M, Tabernero J, Hickish T, et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2343–51.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in B2 colon cancer. International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of B2 Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT B2) Investigators. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1356–63.
6.
Mamounas E, Wieand S, Wolmark N, Bear HD, Atkins JN, Song K, et al. Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes’ B versus Dukes’ C colon cancer: results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04). J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1349–55.PubMed
7.
Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106:209–16.PubMed
8.
Hernanz F, Revuelta S, Redondo C, Madrazo C, Castillo J, Gomez-Fleitas M. Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:373–6; discussion 376–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:65–71.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Vather R, Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Metcalf P, Connolly A, Hill A. Lymph node examination as a predictor of long-term outcome in Dukes B colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:283–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2896–900.PubMed
12.
Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, Constanda MT, Givel JC. For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer. 1998;83:666–72.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2006;244:602–10.PubMed
14.
Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Wang H. Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:213–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2912–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Cianchi F, Palomba A, Boddi V, Messerini L, Pucciani F, Perigli G, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined. World J Surg. 2002;26:384–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Cserni G, Vinh-Hung V, Burzykowski T. Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol. 2002;81:63–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Norwood MG, Sutton AJ, West K, Sharpe DP, Hemingway D, Kelly MJ. Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer resection specimens: national standards are achievable, and low numbers are associated with reduced survival. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:304–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Baxter NN. Is lymph node count an ideal quality indicator for cancer care? J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:265–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Ricciardi R, Baxter NN. Association versus causation versus quality improvement: setting benchmarks for lymph node evaluation in colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:414–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Simunovic M, Baxter NN. Lymph node counts in colon cancer surgery: lessons for users of quality indicators. JAMA. 2007;298:2194–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Goldstein NS. Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:179–89.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, Francioni G, Accarpio G, Anfossi A, et al. Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235:458–63.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Wong JH, Bowles BJ, Bueno R, Shimizu D. Impact of the number of negative nodes on disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1341–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Vather R, Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Connolly AB, Hill AG. Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in Stage II and Stage III colon cancer: a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:585–93.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zaanan A, Meunier K, Sangar F, Flejou JF, Praz F. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: from molecular oncogenic mechanisms to clinical implication. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2011;34:155–76.
27.
Hermanek P, Sobin LH. International Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM classification of malignant tumours. 4th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.CrossRef
28.
Weiss MM, Hermsen MA, Meijer GA, van Diest PJ. Comparative genomic hybridisation. Mol Pathol. 1999;52:243–51.PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
Moore J, Hyman N, Callas P, Littenberg B. Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer specimen and survival. Surgery. 2010;147:358–65.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Wang J, Hassett JM, Dayton MT, Kulaylat MN. Lymph node ratio: role in the staging of node-positive colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1600–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:857–65.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Jestin P, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U. Cancer staging and survival in colon cancer is dependent on the quality of the pathologists’ specimen examination. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2071–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Morris EJ, Maughan NJ, Forman D, Quirke P. Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2573–9.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Etzioni D, Spencer M. Nodal harvest: surgeon or pathologist? Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:366–7; author reply 368.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Wong SL, Ji H, Hollenbeck BK, Morris AM, Baser O, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA. 2007;298:2149–54.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Boland CR, Goel A. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2073–87 e2073.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Pino MS, Chung DC. The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2059–72.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Soreide K, Janssen EA, Soiland H, Korner H, Baak JP. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:395–406.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Parc Y, Gueroult S, Mourra N, Serfaty L, Flejou JF, Tiret E, et al. Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability determined by immunohistochemical staining of MSH2 and MLH1 in sporadic T3N0M0 colon cancer. Gut. 2004;53:371–5.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Dolcetti R, Viel A, Doglioni C, Russo A, Guidoboni M, Capozzi E, et al. High prevalence of activated intraepithelial cytotoxic T lymphocytes and increased neoplastic cell apoptosis in colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:1805–13.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Schwitalle Y, Kloor M, Eiermann S, Linnebacher M, Kienle P, Knaebel HP, et al. Immune response against frameshift-induced neopeptides in HNPCC patients and healthy HNPCC mutation carriers. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:988–97.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Speetjens FM, Lauwen MM, Franken KL, Janssen-van Rhijn CM, van Duikeren S, Bres SA, et al. Prediction of the immunogenic potential of frameshift-mutated antigens in microsatellite instable cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:838–45.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Tougeron D, Fauquembergue E, Rouquette A, Le Pessot F, Sesboue R, Laurent M, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability are correlated with the number and spectrum of frameshift mutations. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:1186–95.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Alexander J, Watanabe T, Wu TT, Rashid A, Li S, Hamilton SR. Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:527–35.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Jass JR, Do KA, Simms LA, Iino H, Wynter C, Pillay SP, et al. Morphology of sporadic colorectal cancer with DNA replication errors. Gut. 1998;42:673–9.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Phillips SM, Banerjea A, Feakins R, Li SR, Bustin SA, Dorudi S. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability are activated and cytotoxic. Br J Surg. 2004;91:469–75.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Smyrk TC, Watson P, Kaul K, Lynch HT. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are a marker for microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91:2417–22.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Ogino S, Nosho K, Irahara N, Meyerhardt JA, Baba Y, Shima K, et al. Lymphocytic reaction to colorectal cancer is associated with longer survival, independent of lymph node count, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6412–20.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Jenkins MA, Hayashi S, O’Shea AM, Burgart LJ, Smyrk TC, Shimizu D, et al. Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:48–56.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Murphy J, Pocard M, Jass JR, O’Sullivan GC, Lee G, Talbot IC. Number and size of lymph nodes recovered from dukes B rectal cancers: correlation with prognosis and histologic antitumor immune response. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1526–34.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Pihl E, Nairn RC, Hughes ES, Cuthbertson AM, Rollo AJ. Regional lymph node and stromal immunomorphology in colorectal carcinoma and relation to tumour spread. Pathology. 1980;12:15–21.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Eveno C, Nemeth J, Soliman H, Praz F, de The H, Valleur P, Talbot IC, et al. Association between a high number of isolated lymph nodes in T1 to T4 N0M0 colorectal cancer and the microsatellite instability phenotype. Arch Surg. 2010;145:12–7.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Soreide K, Nedrebo BS, Soreide JA, Slewa A, Korner H. Lymph node harvest in colon cancer: influence of microsatellite instability and proximal tumor location. World J Surg. 2009;33:2695–703.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Beresford M, Glynne-Jones R, Richman P, Makris A, Mawdsley S, Stott D, et al. The reliability of lymph-node staging in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2005;17:448–55.CrossRef
57.
Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I, Rawet V, Pereira DD, Sousa AH, et al. Absence of lymph nodes in the resected specimen after radical surgery for distal rectal cancer and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: what does it mean? Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:277–83.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Marks JH, Valsdottir EB, Rather AA, Nweze IC, Newman DA, Chernick MR. Fewer than 12 lymph nodes can be expected in a surgical specimen after high-dose chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1023–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
High Lymph Node Yield is Related to Microsatellite Instability in Colon Cancer
Authors
E. J. Th. Belt, MD
E. A. te Velde, MD, PhD
O. Krijgsman
R. P. M. Brosens, MD, PhD
M. Tijssen
H. F. van Essen
H. B. A. C. Stockmann, MD, PhD
H. Bril, MD, PhD
B. Carvalho, PhD
B. Ylstra, PhD
H. J. Bonjer, MD, PhD
G. A. Meijer, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2091-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2012 Go to the issue

Gastrointestinal Oncology

The Combined Expression of Metaplasia Biomarkers Predicts the Prognosis Of Gastric Cancer

Translational Research and Biomarkers

Changes in Myostatin Signaling in Non-Weight-Losing Cancer Patients

Melanomas

Sentinel Lymph Nodes Containing Very Small (<0.1 mm) Deposits of Metastatic Melanoma Cannot Be Safely Regarded as Tumor-Negative

Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

The Combination of Surgery and Imatinib in GIST: A Reality for Localized Tumors at High Risk, an Open Issue for Metastatic Ones

Melanomas

Preoperative Ultrasound is Not Useful for Identifying Nodal Metastasis in Melanoma Patients Undergoing Sentinel Node Biopsy: Preoperative Ultrasound in Clinically Node-Negative Melanoma

Breast Oncology

Association between Recency of Last Pregnancy and Biologic Subtype of Breast Cancer