Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2008

01-06-2008 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Lymph Node Ratio: Role in the Staging of Node-Positive Colon Cancer

Authors: Jiping Wang, MD, PhD, James M. Hassett, MD, Merril T. Dayton, MD, Mahmoud N. Kulaylat, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent literature has shown that lymph node ratio (LNR) is superior to the number of positive lymph nodes (pLNs) in predicting the prognosis in several malignances other than colon cancer. We hypothesize that LNR may play a similar role in stage III colon cancer.

Methods

We included 24,477 stage III colon cancer cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. Patients were categorized into four groups, LNR1 to 4, according to cutoff points \( \raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$} \kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em \lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle {14}$} \), 0.25, and 0.50. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate the prognostic effect and estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of LNR.

Results

The 5-year survival for patients with stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC was 71.3%, 51.7%, and 34.0%, respectively (P < .0001). There was no survival difference among LNR1 to LNR4 for stage IIIA patients. In stage IIIB patients, the 5-year survival for those with LNR1 to LNR4 was 63.5%, 54.7%, 44.4%, and 34.2%, respectively (P < .0001). In stage IIIC patients, the 5-year survival for those with LNR2 to LNR4 was 49.6%, 41.7%, and 25.2%, respectively (P < .0001). LNR is an independent predictor of survival after adjusting patient’s age, tumor size, tumor grade, race, number of pLNs, and total number of LNs harvested. (RR 2.30, 95% CI 2.08–2.55).

Conclusion

Patients with stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer represent a heterogeneous group of patients with the majority either overstaged or understaged. LNR is a more accurate prognostic method for stage III colon cancer patients. We propose an algorithm to incorporate LNR into current AJCC staging system.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hutter RVP. At last: worldwide agreement on the staging of cancer. Arch Surg 1987; 122:1235–9PubMed Hutter RVP. At last: worldwide agreement on the staging of cancer. Arch Surg 1987; 122:1235–9PubMed
3.
go back to reference AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002 AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002
4.
go back to reference Greene FL, Stewart AK, Norton J. A new TNM staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) colon cancer: An analysis of 50,042 patients. Ann Surg 2002; 236:416–21PubMedCrossRef Greene FL, Stewart AK, Norton J. A new TNM staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) colon cancer: An analysis of 50,042 patients. Ann Surg 2002; 236:416–21PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8706–12PubMedCrossRef Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8706–12PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yu W, Choi GS, Wang I, et al. Comparison of five systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1305–9PubMedCrossRef Yu W, Choi GS, Wang I, et al. Comparison of five systems for staging lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1305–9PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Lymph node status assessment for gastric carcinoma: is the number of metastatic lymph nodes really practical as a parameter for N categories in the TNM classification? J Surg Oncol 1998; 69:15–20PubMedCrossRef Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Lymph node status assessment for gastric carcinoma: is the number of metastatic lymph nodes really practical as a parameter for N categories in the TNM classification? J Surg Oncol 1998; 69:15–20PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Bottcher FK, Stein HJ, et al. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 1998; 228:449–61PubMedCrossRef Siewert JR, Bottcher FK, Stein HJ, et al. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 1998; 228:449–61PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Inoue K, Nakane Y, Liyama H, et al. The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:27–34PubMedCrossRef Inoue K, Nakane Y, Liyama H, et al. The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:27–34PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference van der Wal BC, Butzelaar RM, van der Meij S, et al. Axillary lymph node ratio and total number of removed lymph nodes: Predictors of survival in stage I and II breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28:481–9PubMedCrossRef van der Wal BC, Butzelaar RM, van der Meij S, et al. Axillary lymph node ratio and total number of removed lymph nodes: Predictors of survival in stage I and II breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28:481–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Megale Costa LJ, Soares HP, Gaspar HA, et al. Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total dissected axillaries lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2004; 27:304–6PubMedCrossRef Megale Costa LJ, Soares HP, Gaspar HA, et al. Ratio between positive lymph nodes and total dissected axillaries lymph nodes as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2004; 27:304–6PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vinh-Hung V, Verschraegen C, Promish DI, et al. Ratios of involved nodes in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2004; 6:R680–8PubMedCrossRef Vinh-Hung V, Verschraegen C, Promish DI, et al. Ratios of involved nodes in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2004; 6:R680–8PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Voordeckers M, Vinh-Hung V, Van de Steene J, et al. The lymph node ratio as prognostic factor in node-positive breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2004; 70:225–30PubMedCrossRef Voordeckers M, Vinh-Hung V, Van de Steene J, et al. The lymph node ratio as prognostic factor in node-positive breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2004; 70:225–30PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Truong PT, Berthelet E, Lee J, et al. Prognostic significance of the percentage of positive/dissected axillary nodes in breast cancer relapse and survival in patients with 1–3 positive axillary nodes. Cancer 2005; 103:2006–14PubMedCrossRef Truong PT, Berthelet E, Lee J, et al. Prognostic significance of the percentage of positive/dissected axillary nodes in breast cancer relapse and survival in patients with 1–3 positive axillary nodes. Cancer 2005; 103:2006–14PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:2910–6PubMedCrossRef Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:2910–6PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference De Ridder M, Vinh-Hung V, Van Nieuwenhove Y, et al. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer. Gut 2006; 55:1681PubMedCrossRef De Ridder M, Vinh-Hung V, Van Nieuwenhove Y, et al. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer. Gut 2006; 55:1681PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53:457–81CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53:457–81CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29–36PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29–36PubMed
19.
go back to reference Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 1972; 34:187–220 Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 1972; 34:187–220
20.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:433–41PubMedCrossRef Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:433–41PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastasis and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 2007; 245:543–52PubMedCrossRef Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastasis and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 2007; 245:543–52PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Walker MJ, Osborne MD, Young DC, et al: The natural history of breast cancer with more than 10 positive nodes. Am J Surg 1995; 169:575–9PubMedCrossRef Walker MJ, Osborne MD, Young DC, et al: The natural history of breast cancer with more than 10 positive nodes. Am J Surg 1995; 169:575–9PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gurkaynay M, Yildiz F, Atahan L. T3N0M0 breast cancer patients: A subgroup with favorable prognosis. Turkish J. Cancer 2003; 33:144–9 Gurkaynay M, Yildiz F, Atahan L. T3N0M0 breast cancer patients: A subgroup with favorable prognosis. Turkish J. Cancer 2003; 33:144–9
24.
go back to reference Wong JH, Severino R, Honnerbier MB, et al. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:2896–900PubMed Wong JH, Severino R, Honnerbier MB, et al. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:2896–900PubMed
25.
go back to reference Wong JH, Johnson DS, Hemmings D, et al. Assessing the quality of colorectal cancer staging: documenting the process in improving the staging of node negative cororectal cancer. Arch Surg 2005; 140:881–6PubMedCrossRef Wong JH, Johnson DS, Hemmings D, et al. Assessing the quality of colorectal cancer staging: documenting the process in improving the staging of node negative cororectal cancer. Arch Surg 2005; 140:881–6PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:65–71PubMedCrossRef Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:65–71PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tepper JE, O’Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:157–63PubMed Tepper JE, O’Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:157–63PubMed
28.
go back to reference Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer 2000; 88:1739–57PubMedCrossRef Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer 2000; 88:1739–57PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Yarbro JW, Page DL, Fielding LP, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference. Cancer 1999; 86:2436–46PubMedCrossRef Yarbro JW, Page DL, Fielding LP, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference. Cancer 1999; 86:2436–46PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Weldon S, Coffey M, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed from adenocarcinoma: Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106:209–16PubMed Goldstein NS, Weldon S, Coffey M, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed from adenocarcinoma: Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106:209–16PubMed
31.
go back to reference Kim J, Huynh R, Abraham I, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and its impact on colorectal cancer staging. Am Surg 2006; 72:902–5PubMed Kim J, Huynh R, Abraham I, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and its impact on colorectal cancer staging. Am Surg 2006; 72:902–5PubMed
32.
go back to reference Berberoglu U. Prognostic significance of total lymph node number in patients with T1–4N0M0 colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51:1689–93PubMed Berberoglu U. Prognostic significance of total lymph node number in patients with T1–4N0M0 colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51:1689–93PubMed
Metadata
Title
Lymph Node Ratio: Role in the Staging of Node-Positive Colon Cancer
Authors
Jiping Wang, MD, PhD
James M. Hassett, MD
Merril T. Dayton, MD
Mahmoud N. Kulaylat, MD
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9716-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2008 Go to the issue