Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Translational Research and Biomarkers

Tissue hOGG1 Genotype Predicts Bladder Cancer Prognosis: A Novel Approach Using a Peptide Nucleic Acid Clamping Method

Authors: Yun-Sok Ha, MD, PhD, Chunri Yan, BSc, Isaac Yi Kim, MD, PhD, Seok-Joong Yun, MD, PhD, Sung-Kwon Moon, PhD, Wun-Jae Kim, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Tissue genotyping is a more useful approach than using blood genomic DNA, because the tumor tissues can reflect the effects of somatic mutations in cancer. We investigated the value of the human oxoguanine glycosylase (hOGG1) genotype determined in tumor tissues as a prognostic indicator for bladder cancer (BC) using a novel technological approach.

Methods

A total of 335 DNA samples from patients with primary BC were analyzed by peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) clamping to characterize the association between genetic polymorphisms within hOGG1 codon 326 and the clinicopathological characteristics of primary BC patients.

Results

Tumor stage and number were significantly associated with the hOGG1 codon 326 genotype in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. Compared with Cys326Ser and Ser326Ser, the Cys326Cys genotype had a greater progression-free survival benefit in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that the hOGG1 Cys326Cys genotype has a protective effect against progression in MIBC (hazard ratio, 0.360 and 0.314, respectively).

Conclusions

The hOGG1 tissue genotype is associated with aggressive clinicopathological features in NMIBC and with progression in patients with MIBC. Results suggest that the hOGG1 tissue genotype represents a promising marker for assessing BC prognosis in the clinical setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hirao Y, Kim WJ, Fujimoto K. Environmental factors promoting bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19:494–9.PubMedCrossRef Hirao Y, Kim WJ, Fujimoto K. Environmental factors promoting bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19:494–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ames BN, Gold LS, Willett WC. The causes and prevention of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5258–65.PubMedCrossRef Ames BN, Gold LS, Willett WC. The causes and prevention of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5258–65.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Michaels ML, Cruz C, Grollman AP, Miller JH. Evidence that MutY and MutM combine to prevent mutations by an oxidatively damaged form of guanine in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7022–5.PubMedCrossRef Michaels ML, Cruz C, Grollman AP, Miller JH. Evidence that MutY and MutM combine to prevent mutations by an oxidatively damaged form of guanine in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7022–5.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berwick M, Vineis P. Markers of DNA repair and susceptibility to cancer in humans: an epidemiologic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:874–97.PubMedCrossRef Berwick M, Vineis P. Markers of DNA repair and susceptibility to cancer in humans: an epidemiologic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:874–97.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Friedberg EC. How nucleotide excision repair protects against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:22–33.PubMedCrossRef Friedberg EC. How nucleotide excision repair protects against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:22–33.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim EJ, Jeong P, Quan C, Kim J, Bae SC, Yoon SJ, et al. Genotypes of TNF-alpha, VEGF, hOGG1, GSTM1, and GSTT1: useful determinants for clinical outcome of bladder cancer. Urology. 2005;65:70–5.PubMedCrossRef Kim EJ, Jeong P, Quan C, Kim J, Bae SC, Yoon SJ, et al. Genotypes of TNF-alpha, VEGF, hOGG1, GSTM1, and GSTT1: useful determinants for clinical outcome of bladder cancer. Urology. 2005;65:70–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sugimura H, Kohno T, Wakai K, Nagura K, Genka K, Igarashi H, et al. hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:669–74.PubMed Sugimura H, Kohno T, Wakai K, Nagura K, Genka K, Igarashi H, et al. hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:669–74.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Xing DY, Tan W, Song N, Lin DX. Ser326Cys polymorphism in hOGG1 gene and risk of esophageal cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer. 2001;95:140–3.PubMedCrossRef Xing DY, Tan W, Song N, Lin DX. Ser326Cys polymorphism in hOGG1 gene and risk of esophageal cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer. 2001;95:140–3.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Orum H, Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O, Stanley C. Single base pair mutation analysis by PNA directed PCR clamping. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:5332–6.PubMedCrossRef Orum H, Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O, Stanley C. Single base pair mutation analysis by PNA directed PCR clamping. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:5332–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun, Tanaka T, Udagawa K, Kato M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7276–82.PubMedCrossRef Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun, Tanaka T, Udagawa K, Kato M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7276–82.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Bohle A, Palou-Redorta J. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 2008;54:303–14.PubMedCrossRef Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Bohle A, Palou-Redorta J. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 2008;54:303–14.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Greene FL. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2002;87:13–5.PubMed Greene FL. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2002;87:13–5.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Jakse G, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, et al. The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2009;55:815–25.PubMedCrossRef Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Jakse G, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, et al. The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2009;55:815–25.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chen CY, Shiesh SC, Wu SJ. Rapid detection of K-ras mutations in bile by peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping and melting curve analysis: comparison with restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Clin Chem. 2004;50:481–9.PubMedCrossRef Chen CY, Shiesh SC, Wu SJ. Rapid detection of K-ras mutations in bile by peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping and melting curve analysis: comparison with restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Clin Chem. 2004;50:481–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Beau-Faller M, Legrain M, Voegeli AC, Guerin E, Lavaux T, Ruppert AM, et al. Detection of K-Ras mutations in tumour samples of patients with non-small cell lung cancer using PNA-mediated PCR clamping. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:985–92.PubMedCrossRef Beau-Faller M, Legrain M, Voegeli AC, Guerin E, Lavaux T, Ruppert AM, et al. Detection of K-Ras mutations in tumour samples of patients with non-small cell lung cancer using PNA-mediated PCR clamping. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:985–92.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wikman H, Risch A, Klimek F, Schmezer P, Spiegelhalder B, Dienemann H, et al. hOGG1 polymorphism and loss of heterozygosity (LOH): significance for lung cancer susceptibility in a caucasian population. Int J Cancer. 2000;88:932–7.PubMedCrossRef Wikman H, Risch A, Klimek F, Schmezer P, Spiegelhalder B, Dienemann H, et al. hOGG1 polymorphism and loss of heterozygosity (LOH): significance for lung cancer susceptibility in a caucasian population. Int J Cancer. 2000;88:932–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gangwar R, Ahirwar D, Mandhani A, Mittal RD. Do DNA repair genes OGG1, XRCC3 and XRCC7 have an impact on susceptibility to bladder cancer in the North Indian population? Mutat Res. 2009;680:56–63.PubMed Gangwar R, Ahirwar D, Mandhani A, Mittal RD. Do DNA repair genes OGG1, XRCC3 and XRCC7 have an impact on susceptibility to bladder cancer in the North Indian population? Mutat Res. 2009;680:56–63.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Huang M, Dinney CP, Lin X, Lin J, Grossman HB, Wu X. High-order interactions among genetic variants in DNA base excision repair pathway genes and smoking in bladder cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:84–91.PubMedCrossRef Huang M, Dinney CP, Lin X, Lin J, Grossman HB, Wu X. High-order interactions among genetic variants in DNA base excision repair pathway genes and smoking in bladder cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:84–91.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sanyal S, De Verdier PJ, Steineck G, Larsson P, Onelov E, Hemminki K, et al. Polymorphisms in XPD, XPC and the risk of death in patients with urinary bladder neoplasms. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:31–41.PubMedCrossRef Sanyal S, De Verdier PJ, Steineck G, Larsson P, Onelov E, Hemminki K, et al. Polymorphisms in XPD, XPC and the risk of death in patients with urinary bladder neoplasms. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:31–41.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tissue hOGG1 Genotype Predicts Bladder Cancer Prognosis: A Novel Approach Using a Peptide Nucleic Acid Clamping Method
Authors
Yun-Sok Ha, MD, PhD
Chunri Yan, BSc
Isaac Yi Kim, MD, PhD
Seok-Joong Yun, MD, PhD
Sung-Kwon Moon, PhD
Wun-Jae Kim, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1500-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2011 Go to the issue