Published in:
01-11-2008 | Hepatic and Pancreatic Tumors
Bridging Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation
Authors:
Jason T. Heckman, MD, Michael B. deVera, MD, J. Wallis Marsh, MD, MBA, Paulo Fontes, MD, Nikhil B. Amesur, MD, Shane E. Holloway, MD, Michael Nalesnik, MD, David A. Geller, MD, Jennifer L. Steel, PhD, T. Clark Gamblin, MD, MS
Published in:
Annals of Surgical Oncology
|
Issue 11/2008
Login to get access
Abstract
Introduction
The impact of locoregional therapy prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma utilizing either transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), yttrium-90 (90Y), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or resection prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is largely unknown. We sought to examine locoregional therapies and their effect on survival compared with transplantation alone.
Methods
A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
Results
123 patients were included. Patients were analyzed in two groups. Group I consisted of 50 patients that received therapy (20 TACE; 16 90Y; 13 RFA, 3 resections). Group II consisted of 73 patients transplanted without therapy. Median list time was 28 days (range 2–260 days ) in group I, and 24 days (range 1–380 days) in group II. Median time from therapy to OLT was 3.8 months (range 9 days to 68 months). Twelve patients (24%) were successfully downstaged (8 TACE, 2 90Y, 2 RFA/resection). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 81%, 74%, and 74%, respectively. Survival was not statistically significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.53). The 12 patients downstaged did not have a significant difference in survival as compared with the patients who received therapy but did not respond or the patients who were transplanted without therapy (P = 0.76).
Conclusion
Our report addresses locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to transplant. There was no statistical difference in overall survival between patients treated and those not treated prior to transplant. We provide further evidence that locoregional therapy is a safe tool for patients on the transplant list, does not impact survival, and can downstage selected patients to allow life-saving liver transplantation.