Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2005

01-01-2005 | Editorial

“Axillary Recurrence After a Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy”: Editorial Comment

Author: Philip Z. Israel, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

I recognize Smidt et al.1 for an excellent contribution to the literature on the subject of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer. SLNB is a significant advance in the management of the axilla by decreasing the incidence of lymphedema, avoiding postoperative pain, and eliminating shoulder range-of-motion complications.24 I am encouraged by the data in the article by Smidt et al.1 indicating that the false-negative rate of SLNB in breast cancer is much less than earlier thought (5% vs. .25%).5 Addressing the clinical consequences of the .25% of patients who relapse is interesting speculation. Delayed axillary dissection at the time of axillary relapse should control the local disease with no effect on overall survival. This concept is controversial, and ongoing analysis is needed. Systemic failure does not occur because of axillary failure, but rather, both failures are a consequence of a more aggressive primary tumor. Systemic failure, if it occurs, in these .25% would in all probability not have been prevented if complete axillary dissection had been performed initially in place of SLNB.6
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smidt, MC, Janssen, CMM, Kuster, DM, Bruggink, EDM, Strobbe, LJA 2005Axillary recurrence after a negative sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: incidence and clinical significanceAnn Surg Oncol1229PubMed Smidt, MC, Janssen, CMM, Kuster, DM, Bruggink, EDM, Strobbe, LJA 2005Axillary recurrence after a negative sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: incidence and clinical significanceAnn Surg Oncol1229PubMed
2.
go back to reference Giuliano, AE, Jones, RC, Brennan, M, Statman, R 1997Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancerJ Clin Oncol15234550PubMed Giuliano, AE, Jones, RC, Brennan, M, Statman, R 1997Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancerJ Clin Oncol15234550PubMed
3.
go back to reference Giuliano, AE, Dale, PS, Turner, RR, et al. 1995Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomyAnn Surg2223949PubMed Giuliano, AE, Dale, PS, Turner, RR,  et al. 1995Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomyAnn Surg2223949PubMed
4.
go back to reference Krag, D, Weaver, D, Ashikaga, T, et al. 1998The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation studyN Engl J Med3399416CrossRefPubMed Krag, D, Weaver, D, Ashikaga, T,  et al. 1998The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation studyN Engl J Med3399416CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Estourgie, SH, Nieweg, OE, Rutgers, EJ, Kroon, BB 2003What is a false negative result for sentinel node procedures in breast cancer?J Surg Oncol821412CrossRefPubMed Estourgie, SH, Nieweg, OE, Rutgers, EJ, Kroon, BB 2003What is a false negative result for sentinel node procedures in breast cancer?J Surg Oncol821412CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fisher, B, Redman, C, Fisher, ER, et al. 1985Ten year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy with or without radiationN Engl J Med31267481CrossRefPubMed Fisher, B, Redman, C, Fisher, ER,  et al. 1985Ten year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy with or without radiationN Engl J Med31267481CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
“Axillary Recurrence After a Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy”: Editorial Comment
Author
Philip Z. Israel, MD
Publication date
01-01-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.08.906

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2005 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Forthcoming Reports