Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2005

01-11-2005 | Original Articles

The Consequence of Multiple Re-Excisions to Obtain Clear Lumpectomy Margins in Breast Cancer Patients

Authors: Tehillah S. Menes, MD, Paul Ian Tartter, MD, FACS, Ira Bleiweiss, MD, James H. Godbold, PhD, Alison Estabrook, MD, FACS, Sharon Rosenbaum Smith, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Microscopically clear lumpectomy margins are critical for optimizing local control with breast conservation for cancer. Re-excisions are often necessary to achieve clear surgical margins. Factors that contribute to nonnegative margins and necessitate re-excision may increase the risk of local recurrence.

Methods

Patients who were treated with breast conservation for breast cancers were identified from a prospective database maintained by one of the authors. Factors associated with local recurrence were evaluated in 459 consecutive patients with attention to the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (5%) developed local recurrences at a mean follow-up of 78 months. In multivariate analysis, local recurrence was most significantly associated with the omission of radiotherapy (19% vs. 5%; relative risk [RR], 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–8.2), followed by young age (52 vs. 58; 95% confidence interval, −.83 to −10.6 years) and the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins (none, 4%; one, 7% [RR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, .86–4.89]; two or more, 17% [RR, 5.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.44–18.8]). Tumor size, the number of involved nodes, pathology, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly related to local recurrence.

Conclusions

The risk of local recurrence after breast conservation for breast cancer increases progressively with the number of re-excisions needed to achieve clear margins. Patients in whom the cancer is fully excised with clear margins in the first excision will have less of a chance of local recurrence compared with patients who need further re-excision to achieve clear margins.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, re-excision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 1999;179:81–5CrossRef Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, re-excision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 1999;179:81–5CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation. Cancer 1995;76:259–67 Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation. Cancer 1995;76:259–67
3.
go back to reference Anscher MS, Jones P, Prosnitz LR, et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg 1993;218:22–8 Anscher MS, Jones P, Prosnitz LR, et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg 1993;218:22–8
4.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 2000;355:1739–40 Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 2000;355:1739–40
5.
go back to reference Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Bodian C, Brower ST. Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:509–15CrossRef Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Bodian C, Brower ST. Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:509–15CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim SH, Simkovich-Heerdt A, Tran KN, et al. Women 35 years of age or younger have higher locoregional relapse rates after undergoing breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:1–8CrossRef Kim SH, Simkovich-Heerdt A, Tran KN, et al. Women 35 years of age or younger have higher locoregional relapse rates after undergoing breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:1–8CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kollias J, Elston CW, Ellis IO, et al. Early-onset breast cancer—histopathological and prognostic considerations. Br J Cancer 1997;75:1318–23 Kollias J, Elston CW, Ellis IO, et al. Early-onset breast cancer—histopathological and prognostic considerations. Br J Cancer 1997;75:1318–23
8.
go back to reference Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth J Jr. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:693–704 Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth J Jr. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:693–704
9.
go back to reference Carter D. Margins of “lumpectomy” for breast cancer. Hum Pathol 1986;17:330–2 Carter D. Margins of “lumpectomy” for breast cancer. Hum Pathol 1986;17:330–2
10.
go back to reference Graham RA, Homer MJ, Katz J, et al. The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002;184:89–93CrossRef Graham RA, Homer MJ, Katz J, et al. The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002;184:89–93CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:291–9CrossRef Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:291–9CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Neuschatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2002;94:1917–24CrossRef Neuschatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2002;94:1917–24CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Consequence of Multiple Re-Excisions to Obtain Clear Lumpectomy Margins in Breast Cancer Patients
Authors
Tehillah S. Menes, MD
Paul Ian Tartter, MD, FACS
Ira Bleiweiss, MD
James H. Godbold, PhD
Alison Estabrook, MD, FACS
Sharon Rosenbaum Smith, MD
Publication date
01-11-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2005
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.03.021

Other articles of this Issue 11/2005

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2005 Go to the issue

Introduction to the Presidential Address

Introduction of Dr. S. Eva Singletary