Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023

03-08-2023 | Esophageal Cancer | Thoracic Oncology

Efficacy and Quality of Life with the Modified Versus the Traditional Thoraco-Laparoscopic McKeown Procedure for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Authors: Ziqiang Hong, MD, Baiqiang Cui, MD, Yingjie Lu, MD, Xiangdou Bai, MD, Ning Yang, MD, Xiaoyang He, MD, Xusheng Wu, MD, Tao Cheng, MD, Dacheng Jin, MD, Jing Zhao, MD, Yunjiu Gou, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and postoperative quality of life for patients with esophageal cancer treated by either the modified or the traditional thoracolaparoscopic McKeown procedure.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study included 269 patients with esophageal cancer admitted to three medical centers in China from February 2020 to August 2022. The patients were divided according to surgical method into the layered hand-sewn end-to-end invagination anastomosis group (modified group) and the traditional hand anastomosis group (traditional group). Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to maintain balance and comparability between the two groups.

Results

The differences in age and tumor location between the patients in the traditional and modified groups were statistically significant. After PSM, the aforementioned factors were statistically insignificant. After PSM, each group had 101 patients. The modified group showed the greater advantage in terms of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.036), incidence of anastomotic leak (P = 0.009), and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (P < 0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. The results of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophageal Cancer Module 18 (QLQ-OES18) scales showed that the modified group also had the advantage over the traditional group in terms of physical function, overall health status, loss of appetite, eating, reflux, obstruction, and loss of appetite scores at the first and third months after surgery.

Conclusion

The modified thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown procedure is a safe and effective surgical approach that can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak and gastroesophageal reflux, shorten the postoperative hospital stay, and improve the postoperative quality of life for patients with esophageal cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, et al. Minimally invasive versus open McKeown for patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:6329–36.CrossRefPubMed Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, et al. Minimally invasive versus open McKeown for patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:6329–36.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fabbi M, Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment. Dis Esophagus. 2021;34:doaa039.PubMed Fabbi M, Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment. Dis Esophagus. 2021;34:doaa039.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. The impact of severe anastomotic leak on long-term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Ann Surg. 2015;262:972–80.CrossRefPubMed Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. The impact of severe anastomotic leak on long-term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Ann Surg. 2015;262:972–80.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.CrossRefPubMed Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1384–94.CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1384–94.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gooszen JAH, Goense L, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:552–60.CrossRefPubMed Gooszen JAH, Goense L, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:552–60.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mboumi IW, Reddy S, Lidor AO. Complications after esophagectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2019;99:501–10.CrossRefPubMed Mboumi IW, Reddy S, Lidor AO. Complications after esophagectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2019;99:501–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Grimminger PP, Goense L, Gockel I, et al. Diagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1434:254–73.CrossRefPubMed Grimminger PP, Goense L, Gockel I, et al. Diagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1434:254–73.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: esophagectomy complications consensus group (ECCG). Ann Surg. 2015;262:286–94.CrossRefPubMed Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: esophagectomy complications consensus group (ECCG). Ann Surg. 2015;262:286–94.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hall BR, Flores LE, Parshall ZS, Shostrom VK, Are C, Reames BN. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: a NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:661–9.CrossRefPubMed Hall BR, Flores LE, Parshall ZS, Shostrom VK, Are C, Reames BN. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: a NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:661–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Corsini EM, Hofstetter WL. MD Anderson esophageal cancer working group. Ketorolac use and anastomotic leak in patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:448–54.CrossRefPubMed Corsini EM, Hofstetter WL. MD Anderson esophageal cancer working group. Ketorolac use and anastomotic leak in patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:448–54.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P, Busch OR, van Lanschot JJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1064–9.CrossRefPubMed van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P, Busch OR, van Lanschot JJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1064–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Derogar M, Orsini N, Sadr-Azodi O, Lagergren P. Influence of major postoperative complications on health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of esophageal cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1615–9.CrossRefPubMed Derogar M, Orsini N, Sadr-Azodi O, Lagergren P. Influence of major postoperative complications on health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of esophageal cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1615–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Van der Schaaf M, Johar A, Lagergren P, et al. Surgical prevention of reflux after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3655–61.CrossRefPubMed Van der Schaaf M, Johar A, Lagergren P, et al. Surgical prevention of reflux after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3655–61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lagarde SM, Vrouenraets BC, Stassen LP, van Lanschot JJ. Evidence-based surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: overview of high-quality studies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1319–26.CrossRefPubMed Lagarde SM, Vrouenraets BC, Stassen LP, van Lanschot JJ. Evidence-based surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: overview of high-quality studies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1319–26.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:139–44.CrossRefPubMed Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:139–44.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, Martyn St-James M, Fayers PM, Brown JM. Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:89–96.CrossRefPubMed Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, Martyn St-James M, Fayers PM, Brown JM. Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:89–96.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and Quality of Life with the Modified Versus the Traditional Thoraco-Laparoscopic McKeown Procedure for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study
Authors
Ziqiang Hong, MD
Baiqiang Cui, MD
Yingjie Lu, MD
Xiangdou Bai, MD
Ning Yang, MD
Xiaoyang He, MD
Xusheng Wu, MD
Tao Cheng, MD
Dacheng Jin, MD
Jing Zhao, MD
Yunjiu Gou, MD
Publication date
03-08-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2023
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14033-x

Other articles of this Issue 13/2023

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023 Go to the issue