Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2020

01-11-2020 | Ultrasound | Breast Oncology

Node-Positive Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Be Spared Axillary Lymph Node Dissection with Wireless Non-Radioactive Localizers

Authors: Alison Laws, MD, Kayla Dillon, BA, Bridget N. Kelly, BA, Olga Kantor, MD, MS, Kevin S. Hughes, MD, Michele A. Gadd, MD, Barbara L. Smith, MD, PhD, Leslie R. Lamb, MD, Michelle Specht, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and excision of a biopsy-proven node marked by a clip. This study evaluates the feasibility of non-radioactive wireless localizers for targeted excision of clipped axillary lymph nodes.

Methods

We identified biopsy-proven, node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and TAD from 2016 to 2020, and included those with a clipped node localized using SAVI SCOUT, Magseed, or RFID Tag. Primary outcome measures were (1) successful localization (ultrasound or mammographic-guided placement < 10 mm from target), and (2) retrieval of the clipped node during TAD, documented by specimen radiography or gross visualization. Secondary outcomes included rates of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) and complications.

Results

Overall, 57 patients were included; 1 (1.8%) patient had no clip visible at the time of localization, and no radiographic confirmation of clip placement at the time of biopsy, and was therefore excluded. In the remaining 56 patients, localization was successful in 53 (94.6%) patients and the clipped node was retrieved during TAD in 51 (91.1%) patients. Twenty-three of 27 (85.2%) ypN0 patients were spared cALND; 3 (11.1%) patients had cALND for failed clipped node retrieval during TAD, and 1 (3.7%) for false-positive frozen section. In patients with TAD alone, the rates of axillary seroma and infection were 20.0% and 8.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Wireless non-radioactive localizers are feasible for axillary localization after NAT, with high success rates of retrieving clipped nodes. The lack of signal decay is an advantage of these devices, allowing flexibility in timing of placement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164–72.CrossRef Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164–72.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Alvarado R, Yi M, Le-Petross H, et al. The role for sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients who present with node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3177–84.CrossRef Alvarado R, Yi M, Le-Petross H, et al. The role for sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients who present with node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3177–84.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1455–61.CrossRef Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1455–61.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mamtani A, Barrio AV, King TA, et al. How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissectino in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(11):3467–74.CrossRef Mamtani A, Barrio AV, King TA, et al. How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissectino in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(11):3467–74.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(3):258–64.CrossRef Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(3):258–64.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):609–18.CrossRef Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):609–18.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, McCall LM, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, et al. identification and resection of clipped node decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node surgery in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):802–7.CrossRef Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, McCall LM, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, et al. identification and resection of clipped node decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node surgery in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):802–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Gilcrease MZ, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of a targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1072–8.CrossRef Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Gilcrease MZ, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of a targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1072–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, et al: Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure. Ann Surg 2015;261:378–382.CrossRef Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, et al: Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure. Ann Surg 2015;261:378–382.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Diego EJ, McAuliffe PF, Soran A, et al. Axillary staging after neoadjuvnt chemotherapy for breast cancer: a pilot study combining sentinel lymph node biopsy with radioactive seed localization of pre-treatment positive axillary lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(5):1549–53.CrossRef Diego EJ, McAuliffe PF, Soran A, et al. Axillary staging after neoadjuvnt chemotherapy for breast cancer: a pilot study combining sentinel lymph node biopsy with radioactive seed localization of pre-treatment positive axillary lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(5):1549–53.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nguyen TT, Hieken TJ, Glazebrook KN, et al. Localizing the clipped node in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: early learning experience and challenges. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24(10):3011–16.CrossRef Nguyen TT, Hieken TJ, Glazebrook KN, et al. Localizing the clipped node in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: early learning experience and challenges. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24(10):3011–16.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Plecha D, Bai S, Patterson H, et al. Improving the accuracy of axillary lymph node surgery in breast cancer with ultrasound-guided wire localization of biopsy proven metastatic lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:4241–6.CrossRef Plecha D, Bai S, Patterson H, et al. Improving the accuracy of axillary lymph node surgery in breast cancer with ultrasound-guided wire localization of biopsy proven metastatic lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:4241–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dauphine C, et al. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of wireless localization of nonpalpable breast lesions using radiofrequency identification technology. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(6):W720-3.CrossRef Dauphine C, et al. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of wireless localization of nonpalpable breast lesions using radiofrequency identification technology. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(6):W720-3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Reicher JJ, et al. Radiofrequency identification tags for preoperative tumor localization: proof of concept. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(5):1359–65.CrossRef Reicher JJ, et al. Radiofrequency identification tags for preoperative tumor localization: proof of concept. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(5):1359–65.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference DiNome ML, et al. Microchipping the breast: an effective new technology for localizing non-palpable breast lesions for surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175:165–70.CrossRef DiNome ML, et al. Microchipping the breast: an effective new technology for localizing non-palpable breast lesions for surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175:165–70.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Caudle AS, Yang WT, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Hwang R, Hobbs B, Hunt KK, Krishnamurthy S, Kuerer HM. Selective surgical localization of axillary lymph nodes containing metastases in patients with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(2):137–43.CrossRef Caudle AS, Yang WT, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Hwang R, Hobbs B, Hunt KK, Krishnamurthy S, Kuerer HM. Selective surgical localization of axillary lymph nodes containing metastases in patients with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(2):137–43.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ et al. Initial clinical experience with an inducible magnetic seed system for preoperative breast lesion localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210(4):913–7.CrossRef Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ et al. Initial clinical experience with an inducible magnetic seed system for preoperative breast lesion localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210(4):913–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Harvey JR, Lim Y, Murphy J, et al. Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018;169(3):531–6.CrossRef Harvey JR, Lim Y, Murphy J, et al. Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018;169(3):531–6.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hersi AF, Eriksson S, Ramos J, et al. A combined, totally magnetic technique with magnetic marker for non-palpable tumour localizatino and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45(4):544–9.CrossRef Hersi AF, Eriksson S, Ramos J, et al. A combined, totally magnetic technique with magnetic marker for non-palpable tumour localizatino and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45(4):544–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lamb LR, Bahl M, Specht MC, D’Alessandro HA, Lehman CD. Evaluation of a nonradioactive magnetic marker wireless localization program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211(4):940–5.CrossRef Lamb LR, Bahl M, Specht MC, D’Alessandro HA, Lehman CD. Evaluation of a nonradioactive magnetic marker wireless localization program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211(4):940–5.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cox CE, Russel S, Prowler V et al. A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3168–74.CrossRef Cox CE, Russel S, Prowler V et al. A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3168–74.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Patel SN, Mango VL, Jadeja P et al. Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Clin Imaging 2016;47:14–17.CrossRef Patel SN, Mango VL, Jadeja P et al. Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Clin Imaging 2016;47:14–17.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Taback B, Jadeja P, Ha R. Enhanced axillary evaluation using reflector-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy: a prospective feasibility study and comparison with conventional lymphatic mapping techniques. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(5):e869–74.CrossRef Taback B, Jadeja P, Ha R. Enhanced axillary evaluation using reflector-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy: a prospective feasibility study and comparison with conventional lymphatic mapping techniques. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(5):e869–74.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Greenwood HI, Wong JM, Mukhatar RA, Alvarado MD, Price ER. Feasibility of magnetic seeds for preoperative localization of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213(4):953–957.CrossRef Greenwood HI, Wong JM, Mukhatar RA, Alvarado MD, Price ER. Feasibility of magnetic seeds for preoperative localization of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213(4):953–957.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Siso C, de Torres J, Esgueva-Colmenarejo A, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of axillary clip in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with Neaodjuvant therapy (ILINA Trial): a new tool to guide the excision of the clipped node after Neoadjuvant treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25(3):784–91.CrossRef Siso C, de Torres J, Esgueva-Colmenarejo A, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of axillary clip in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with Neaodjuvant therapy (ILINA Trial): a new tool to guide the excision of the clipped node after Neoadjuvant treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25(3):784–91.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Choudhery S, Simmons C, Harper L, Lee CU. Tomosynthesis-guided needle localization of breast and axillary lesions: our initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212(4):943–6.CrossRef Choudhery S, Simmons C, Harper L, Lee CU. Tomosynthesis-guided needle localization of breast and axillary lesions: our initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212(4):943–6.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wilke LG, McCall L, Posther KE et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(4):491–500.CrossRef Wilke LG, McCall L, Posther KE et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(4):491–500.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the american college of surgeons oncology group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(24):3657–63. Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the american college of surgeons oncology group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(24):3657–63.
34.
go back to reference Gunn J, Gibson T, Li Z et al. Symptomatic axillary seroma after sentinel lymph node biopsy: incidence and treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(10):3347–53.CrossRef Gunn J, Gibson T, Li Z et al. Symptomatic axillary seroma after sentinel lymph node biopsy: incidence and treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(10):3347–53.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Laws A, Hughes ME, Hu J et al. Impact of residual nodal disease burden on technical outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy for node-positive (cN1) breast cancer patients treated with Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26(12):3846–55.CrossRef Laws A, Hughes ME, Hu J et al. Impact of residual nodal disease burden on technical outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy for node-positive (cN1) breast cancer patients treated with Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26(12):3846–55.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Komenka IK, Torabi R, Nair G et al. Intraoperative touch imprint and frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 2010;251(2):319–22.CrossRef Komenka IK, Torabi R, Nair G et al. Intraoperative touch imprint and frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 2010;251(2):319–22.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Comparison of axillary lymph node dissection with axillary radiation for patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with chemotherapy (ALLIANCE A011022). ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01901094. Accessed 25 Apr 2020. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Comparison of axillary lymph node dissection with axillary radiation for patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with chemotherapy (ALLIANCE A011022). ClinicalTrials.gov. https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT01901094.​ Accessed 25 Apr 2020.
Metadata
Title
Node-Positive Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Be Spared Axillary Lymph Node Dissection with Wireless Non-Radioactive Localizers
Authors
Alison Laws, MD
Kayla Dillon, BA
Bridget N. Kelly, BA
Olga Kantor, MD, MS
Kevin S. Hughes, MD
Michele A. Gadd, MD
Barbara L. Smith, MD, PhD
Leslie R. Lamb, MD
Michelle Specht, MD
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08902-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2020 Go to the issue