Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Breast Oncology

Influence of Distance to Hospital and Insurance Status on the Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy, a National Cancer Data Base study

Authors: Erin P. Ward, MD, Jonathan T. Unkart, MD, Alex Bryant, BA, James Murphy, MD, Sarah L. Blair, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

We evaluated the impact of travel distance and insurance status on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates in breast cancer.

Methods

We queried the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) for women >18 years of age with a nonmetastatic primary breast cancer of ductal, lobular, or mixed histology. Patient- and facility-specific CPM rates were calculated based on insurance, race, and distance to treatment center. Standard univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed.

Results

Overall, the CPM rate was 6.5% for the 864,105 patients identified. Most patients traveled <20 miles to a treatment center (79.5%) and had private insurance or Medicare (58.3 and 33.4%, respectively). In general, younger, White, non-Hispanic, and privately insured patients residing further from a treatment center was associated with increased rates of CPM. However, distance to the treatment center and insurance type had a greater absolute impact on rates of CPM for Black and Hispanic patients. Absolute CPM rate increases for patients >100 miles from a treatment center compared with those <20 miles from a treatment center were observed to be greater for Black and Hispanic patients (3.5 and 3.9%, respectively) compared with White and non-Hispanic patients (2.5 and 2.6%). Additionally, further patient travel distance was associated with higher treatment center-specific CPM rates.

Conclusion

Increased travel distance is independently associated with increased rates of CPM for all patients and increased facility-specific rates of CPM. Black and Hispanic patients were found to be more vulnerable to the impact of travel distance and insurance status on rates of CPM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elsayegh N, Kuerer HM, Lin H, et al. Predictors that influence contralateral prophylactic mastectomy election among women with ductal carcinoma in situ who were evaluated for BRCA genetic testing. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3466–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elsayegh N, Kuerer HM, Lin H, et al. Predictors that influence contralateral prophylactic mastectomy election among women with ductal carcinoma in situ who were evaluated for BRCA genetic testing. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3466–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Pinell-White XA, Kolegraff K, Carlson GW. Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and the impact on breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:S153–7.CrossRefPubMed Pinell-White XA, Kolegraff K, Carlson GW. Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and the impact on breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:S153–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Abbott A, Rueth N, Pappas-Varco S, Kuntz K, Kerr E, Tuttle T. Perceptions of contralateral breast cancer: an overestimation of risk. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3129–36.CrossRefPubMed Abbott A, Rueth N, Pappas-Varco S, Kuntz K, Kerr E, Tuttle T. Perceptions of contralateral breast cancer: an overestimation of risk. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3129–36.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ager B, Butow P, Jansen J, Phillips KA, Porter D, CPM DA Advisory Group. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): a systematic review of patient reported factors and psychological predictors influencing choice and satisfaction. Breast 2016;28:107–20. Ager B, Butow P, Jansen J, Phillips KA, Porter D, CPM DA Advisory Group. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): a systematic review of patient reported factors and psychological predictors influencing choice and satisfaction. Breast 2016;28:107–20.
5.
go back to reference Katz SJ, Morrow M. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: addressing peace of mind. JAMA 2013;310:793–4.CrossRefPubMed Katz SJ, Morrow M. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: addressing peace of mind. JAMA 2013;310:793–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pesce C, Liederbach E, Wang C, Lapin B, Winchester DJ, Yao K. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy provides no survival benefit in young women with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3231–9.CrossRefPubMed Pesce C, Liederbach E, Wang C, Lapin B, Winchester DJ, Yao K. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy provides no survival benefit in young women with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3231–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Elsayegh N, Profato J, Barrera AM, et al. Predictors that influence election of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with ductal carcinoma in situ who are BRCA-negative. J Cancer 2015;6:610–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elsayegh N, Profato J, Barrera AM, et al. Predictors that influence election of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with ductal carcinoma in situ who are BRCA-negative. J Cancer 2015;6:610–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Albornoz CR, Cohen WA, Razdan SN, et al. The impact of travel distance on breast reconstruction in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:12-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Albornoz CR, Cohen WA, Razdan SN, et al. The impact of travel distance on breast reconstruction in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:12-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Azzopardi J, Walsh D, Chong C, Taylor C. Surgical treatment for women with breast cancer in relation to socioeconomic and insurance status. Breast J 2014;20:3–8.CrossRefPubMed Azzopardi J, Walsh D, Chong C, Taylor C. Surgical treatment for women with breast cancer in relation to socioeconomic and insurance status. Breast J 2014;20:3–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Coburn N, Fulton J, Pearlman DN, Law C, DiPaolo B, Cady B. Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients. Breast J 2008;14:128–34.CrossRefPubMed Coburn N, Fulton J, Pearlman DN, Law C, DiPaolo B, Cady B. Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients. Breast J 2008;14:128–34.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Freedman RA, Virgo KS, He Y, et al. The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care. Cancer 2011;117:180–9.CrossRefPubMed Freedman RA, Virgo KS, He Y, et al. The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care. Cancer 2011;117:180–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Grimmer L, Liederbach E, Velasco J, Pesce C, Wang CH, Yao K. Variation in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates according to racial groups in young women with breast cancer, 1998 to 2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:187–96.CrossRefPubMed Grimmer L, Liederbach E, Velasco J, Pesce C, Wang CH, Yao K. Variation in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates according to racial groups in young women with breast cancer, 1998 to 2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:187–96.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Goyal S, Chandwani S, Haffty BG, Demissie K. Effect of travel distance and time to radiotherapy on likelihood of receiving mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1095–101.CrossRefPubMed Goyal S, Chandwani S, Haffty BG, Demissie K. Effect of travel distance and time to radiotherapy on likelihood of receiving mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1095–101.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lautner M, Lin H, Shen Y, et al. Disparities in the use of breast-conserving therapy among patients with early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:778–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lautner M, Lin H, Shen Y, et al. Disparities in the use of breast-conserving therapy among patients with early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:778–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Lin CC, Bruinooge SS, Kirkwood MK, et al. Association between geographic access to cancer care, insurance, and receipt of chemotherapy: geographic distribution of oncologists and travel distance. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3177–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin CC, Bruinooge SS, Kirkwood MK, et al. Association between geographic access to cancer care, insurance, and receipt of chemotherapy: geographic distribution of oncologists and travel distance. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3177–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Leff DR, Ho C, Thomas H, et al. A multidisciplinary team approach minimises prophylactic mastectomy rates. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1005–12.CrossRefPubMed Leff DR, Ho C, Thomas H, et al. A multidisciplinary team approach minimises prophylactic mastectomy rates. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1005–12.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Acharya S, Hsieh S, Michalski JM, Shinohara ET, Perkins SM. Distance to radiation facility and treatment choice in early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:691–9.CrossRefPubMed Acharya S, Hsieh S, Michalski JM, Shinohara ET, Perkins SM. Distance to radiation facility and treatment choice in early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:691–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference St-Jacques S, Philibert MD, Langlois A, et al. Geographic access to mammography screening centre and participation of women in the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Programme. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:861–7.CrossRefPubMed St-Jacques S, Philibert MD, Langlois A, et al. Geographic access to mammography screening centre and participation of women in the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Programme. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:861–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Loree JM, Javaheri KR, Lefresne SV, et al. Impact of travel distance and urban-rural status on the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. J Rural Health. Epub 7 Oct 2016. Loree JM, Javaheri KR, Lefresne SV, et al. Impact of travel distance and urban-rural status on the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. J Rural Health. Epub 7 Oct 2016.
20.
go back to reference Lara PN Jr, Higdon R, Lim N, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1728–33.CrossRefPubMed Lara PN Jr, Higdon R, Lim N, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1728–33.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Influence of Distance to Hospital and Insurance Status on the Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy, a National Cancer Data Base study
Authors
Erin P. Ward, MD
Jonathan T. Unkart, MD
Alex Bryant, BA
James Murphy, MD
Sarah L. Blair, MD
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5985-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2017 Go to the issue