Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2014

01-10-2014 | Breast Oncology

Predictors that Influence Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Election Among Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Who Were Evaluated for BRCA Genetic Testing

Authors: Nisreen Elsayegh, MS, Henry M. Kuerer, MD, Heather Lin, MD, PhD, Angelica M. Gutierrez Barrera, MS, Michelle Jackson, MS, Kimberly I. Muse, MS, Jennifer K. Litton, MD, Constance Albarracin, MD, PhD, Aimaz Afrough, MD, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, MD, Banu K. Arun, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are at increased risk for developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Consequently, more women with DCIS are electing to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). We evaluated factors associated with CPM in patients with DCIS who underwent genetic counseling for BRCA testing.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 165 women with DCIS referred for genetic counseling between 2003 and 2011. Patient characteristics were age, marital and educational status, tumor markers, nuclear grade, family history of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC), race, Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, and BRCA results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictive factors associated with CPM election.

Results

Of 165 patients, 44 (27 %) underwent CPM. Patients <45 years of age were more likely to elect CPM (p = 0.0098). A BRCA+ mutation was found in 17 patients (10.3 %), and BRCA+ women were more likely to elect CPM than BRCA or untested women (p = 0.0001). Patients who had a family history of OC (57.7 %) were more likely to choose CPM than those with no family history (p = 0.0004). Younger age, BRCA+, and an OC family history remained significant in the multivariate model (p < 0.008).

Conclusion

The CPM rate among patients with DCIS who undergo genetic counseling is high. Factors associated with increased likelihood of CPM among this group were age, BRCA+, and a family history of OC. Further studies are needed to evaluate patients’ perceptions of CBC risk and their role in the likelihood of CPM choice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bayraktar S, Elsayegh N, Gutierrez Barrera A, et al. Predictive factors for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 2012;118: 515–22. Bayraktar S, Elsayegh N, Gutierrez Barrera A, et al. Predictive factors for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer. 2012;118: 515–22.
2.
go back to reference Tuttle T, Jarosek S, Habermann E, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–67.PubMedCrossRef Tuttle T, Jarosek S, Habermann E, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–67.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Albarracin CT, Yang WT, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: state of the science and roadmap to advance the field. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:279–88.PubMedCrossRef Kuerer HM, Albarracin CT, Yang WT, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: state of the science and roadmap to advance the field. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:279–88.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yi M, Hunt K, Arun B, et al. Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Prev Res. 2010;3:1026–34.CrossRef Yi M, Hunt K, Arun B, et al. Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Prev Res. 2010;3:1026–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:676–89.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:676–89.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
7.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1055–62.PubMedCrossRef Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1055–62.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chung A, Huynh K, Lawrence C, Sim MS, Giuliano A. Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2600–06.PubMedCrossRef Chung A, Huynh K, Lawrence C, Sim MS, Giuliano A. Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2600–06.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stuckey A, Dizon D, Scalia Wilbur J, et al. Clinical characteristics and choices regarding risk-reducing surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;69:270–73.PubMedCrossRef Stuckey A, Dizon D, Scalia Wilbur J, et al. Clinical characteristics and choices regarding risk-reducing surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;69:270–73.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wainberg S, Husted J. Utilization of screening and preventive surgery among unaffected carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:1989–95. Wainberg S, Husted J. Utilization of screening and preventive surgery among unaffected carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:1989–95.
11.
go back to reference Skytte AB, Gerdes AM, Andersen MK, et al. Risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers: uptake and timing. Clin Genet. 2010;77:342–49.PubMedCrossRef Skytte AB, Gerdes AM, Andersen MK, et al. Risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers: uptake and timing. Clin Genet. 2010;77:342–49.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hwang ES, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:642–47.PubMedCrossRef Hwang ES, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:642–47.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP, et al. Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1138–45.PubMedCrossRef Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP, et al. Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1138–45.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, et al. Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1480–90.PubMedCrossRef Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, et al. Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1480–90.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Ames: The Iowa State University Press; 1980. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Ames: The Iowa State University Press; 1980.
17.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Brekelmans CT, Menke-Pluymers MB, et al. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at risk of hereditary breast cancer: long-term experiences at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3335–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Brekelmans CT, Menke-Pluymers MB, et al. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at risk of hereditary breast cancer: long-term experiences at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3335–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
19.
20.
go back to reference Meijers-Heijbor H, Van Geel B, Van Putten WL, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:159–64.CrossRef Meijers-Heijbor H, Van Geel B, Van Putten WL, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:159–64.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1633–37.PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1633–37.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Howard-McNatt M, Schroll RW, Hurt GJ, Levine EA. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients who test negative for BRCA mutations. Am J Surg. 2011;202:298–302.PubMedCrossRef Howard-McNatt M, Schroll RW, Hurt GJ, Levine EA. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients who test negative for BRCA mutations. Am J Surg. 2011;202:298–302.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Goldflam K, Hunt KK, Gershenwald JE, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: predictors of significant histologic findings. Cancer. 2004;101:1977–86.PubMedCrossRef Goldflam K, Hunt KK, Gershenwald JE, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: predictors of significant histologic findings. Cancer. 2004;101:1977–86.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Alvarado R, et al. Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and old women with DCIS. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3777–84.PubMedCrossRef Alvarado R, et al. Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and old women with DCIS. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3777–84.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Montgomery LL, Tran KN, Heelan MC, et al. Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:546–52.PubMedCrossRef Montgomery LL, Tran KN, Heelan MC, et al. Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:546–52.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors that Influence Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Election Among Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Who Were Evaluated for BRCA Genetic Testing
Authors
Nisreen Elsayegh, MS
Henry M. Kuerer, MD
Heather Lin, MD, PhD
Angelica M. Gutierrez Barrera, MS
Michelle Jackson, MS
Kimberly I. Muse, MS
Jennifer K. Litton, MD
Constance Albarracin, MD, PhD
Aimaz Afrough, MD
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, MD
Banu K. Arun, MD
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3747-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2014 Go to the issue