Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Gynecologic Oncology

Patterns of Lymph Node Metastases in Apparent Stage I Low-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Study

Authors: Lucas Minig, MD, PhD, MBA, Florian Heitz, MD, David Cibula, MD, Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, MD, Anna Germanova, MD, Sean C. Dowdy, MD, Eleftheria Kalogera, MD, Ignacio Zapardiel, MD, Kristina Lindemann, MD, PhD, Philipp Harter, MD, PhD, Giovanni Scambia, MD, Marco Petrillo, MD, Cristina Zorrero, MD, Vanna Zanagnolo, MD, José Miguel Cárdenas Rebollo, PhD, Andreas du Bois, MD, PhD, Christina Fotopoulou, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine oncological outcomes and incidence of lymph node (LN) metastases in women who underwent systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of apparent stage I low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (LGEOC).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was performed at nine institutions across Europe and the US, and patients who underwent surgical staging for presumed stage I LGEOC between 2000 and 2016 were included. To ensure surgical quality, a minimum number of ≥10 pelvic and ≥10 paraaortic LNs was required. Patients with preoperative radiologic or clinical evidence of extraovarian or LN disease, and those with nonepithelial histology, were excluded.

Results

The overall incidence of LN metastases was 4.3% in the 163 evaluated patients, and the incidence of LN involvement in serous, endometrioid, and mucinous subtypes was 10.7, 1.5, and 0%, respectively. However, Upstaging due to LN involvement alone occurred in only 2.4% of the patients. Eighty-nine (54.6%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy due to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC or higher disease. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89.4–97.1%) and 94.5% (95% CI 90.9–98.0%), respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between LN-negative and LN-positive patients. However, fewer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy in the LN-negative group. Multivariate analysis did not identify any independent prognostic factor of survival.

Conclusion

The risk of LN involvement in nonserous apparent stage I LGEOC appears low, with a rate of <1% in this retrospective analysis, raising questions about the value of lymphadenectomy in those patients. Larger-scale prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the oncologic safety of omitting systematic LN staging in apparent stage I nonserous LGEOC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, et al. Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28:496–504.CrossRefPubMed Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, et al. Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28:496–504.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bonome T. Expression profıling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res. 2005;65(22):10602–10612.CrossRefPubMed Bonome T. Expression profıling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res. 2005;65(22):10602–10612.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, et al. Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:361–368.CrossRefPubMed Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, et al. Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:361–368.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Colombo N, Peiretti M, Parma G, et al.; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl. 5: v23–30.CrossRefPubMed Colombo N, Peiretti M, Parma G, et al.; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl. 5: v23–30.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Berek J, Crum C, Friedlander M. FIGO Cancer Report. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;119 Suppl 2;S118–S129.CrossRefPubMed Berek J, Crum C, Friedlander M. FIGO Cancer Report. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;119 Suppl 2;S118–S129.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell’Anna T, et al. Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer. 2006;18;95(6):699–704. Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell’Anna T, et al. Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer. 2006;18;95(6):699–704.
7.
go back to reference Powless CA, Aletti GD, Bakkum-Gamez JN, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(3):536–40.CrossRefPubMed Powless CA, Aletti GD, Bakkum-Gamez JN, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(3):536–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Petru E, Lahousen M, Tamussino K, et al. Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):656–62.CrossRefPubMed Petru E, Lahousen M, Tamussino K, et al. Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):656–62.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Suzuki M, Ohwada M, Yamada T, et al. Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):305–8.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki M, Ohwada M, Yamada T, et al. Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):305–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lago V, Minig L, Fotopoulou C. Incidence of lymph node metastases in apparent early-stage low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(8):1407–14.CrossRefPubMed Lago V, Minig L, Fotopoulou C. Incidence of lymph node metastases in apparent early-stage low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(8):1407–14.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Prat J; FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 124(1):1–5.CrossRef Prat J; FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 124(1):1–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK, et al. Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(1):12–9.CrossRefPubMed Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK, et al. Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(1):12–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ho CM, Chien TY, Shih BY, et al. Evaluation of complete surgical staging with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy for improvement of survival in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88:394–9.CrossRefPubMed Ho CM, Chien TY, Shih BY, et al. Evaluation of complete surgical staging with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy for improvement of survival in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88:394–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Oshita T, Itamochi H, Nishimura R, et al. Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18(6):1107–13.CrossRefPubMed Oshita T, Itamochi H, Nishimura R, et al. Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18(6):1107–13.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zhou J, Shan G, Chen Y. The effect of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(8):718–26.CrossRefPubMed Zhou J, Shan G, Chen Y. The effect of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(8):718–26.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nasioudis D, Chapman-Davis E, Witkin SS, et al. Prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy and prevalence of lymph node metastasis in clinically-apparent stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144(2):414–419.CrossRefPubMed Nasioudis D, Chapman-Davis E, Witkin SS, et al. Prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy and prevalence of lymph node metastasis in clinically-apparent stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144(2):414–419.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka D, et al. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecol Oncol.2009;114(1):48–52.CrossRefPubMed Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka D, et al. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecol Oncol.2009;114(1):48–52.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patterns of Lymph Node Metastases in Apparent Stage I Low-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Study
Authors
Lucas Minig, MD, PhD, MBA
Florian Heitz, MD
David Cibula, MD
Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, MD
Anna Germanova, MD
Sean C. Dowdy, MD
Eleftheria Kalogera, MD
Ignacio Zapardiel, MD
Kristina Lindemann, MD, PhD
Philipp Harter, MD, PhD
Giovanni Scambia, MD
Marco Petrillo, MD
Cristina Zorrero, MD
Vanna Zanagnolo, MD
José Miguel Cárdenas Rebollo, PhD
Andreas du Bois, MD, PhD
Christina Fotopoulou, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5919-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017 Go to the issue