Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group

Authors: Takafumi Oshita, Hiroaki Itamochi, Ryuichiro Nishimura, Fumitaka Numa, Kazuhiro Takehara, Masamichi Hiura, Hirotoshi Tanimoto, Jun Noma, Ryoji Hayase, Akihiro Murakami, Hideo Fujimoto, Yasunobu Kanamori, Fuminori Kitada, Keiji Shitsukawa, Makoto Nagaji, Yukihisa Minagawa, Michihisa Fujiwara, Junzo Kigawa

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The therapeutic value of systematic lymphadenectomy for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. This study evaluates the survival impact and adverse events of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with pT1 and pT2 EOC.

Methods

A retrospective investigation was performed using data from patients with pT1 and pT2 EOC at multi-institutions belonging to the Sankai Gynecologic Study Group (SGSG). We selected patients who had undergone systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Group LA) (n = 284) and patients who had not undergone lymph node resection (Group no-LA) (n = 138). Outcomes for patients and peri-operative adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results

The median operation time was significantly longer in Group LA (288 min) than in Group no-LA (128 min) (P < 0.0001). Total blood loss was significantly higher in Group LA, 43.7 % of patients receiving blood transfusions. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). However, for patients with pT2, PFS was significantly longer in Group LA than in Group no-LA (P = 0.0150). Lymph node metastases were detected in 23 cases (8.1 %) and these patients had significantly shorter PFS than those without metastasis (P = 0.0409). The outcome for patients who underwent chemotherapy after surgery was significantly improved in the Group no-LA, but no improvement was observed in Group LA.

Conclusions

Systematic lymphadenectomy may improve outcomes only in pT2 EOC patients with acceptable peri-operative events. Furthermore, accurate surgical staging may avoid unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy in selected early-stage cases.
Literature
1.
4.
go back to reference Cass I, Li AJ, Runowicz CD et al (2001) Pattern of lymph node metastases in clinically unilateral stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 80:56–61PubMedCrossRef Cass I, Li AJ, Runowicz CD et al (2001) Pattern of lymph node metastases in clinically unilateral stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 80:56–61PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell’Anna T et al (2006) Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer 95:699–704PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell’Anna T et al (2006) Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer 95:699–704PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tsumura N, Sakuragi N, Hareyama H et al (1998) Distribution pattern and risk factors of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Cancer 79:526–530PubMedCrossRef Tsumura N, Sakuragi N, Hareyama H et al (1998) Distribution pattern and risk factors of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Cancer 79:526–530PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Panici PB, Angioli R (2002) Role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16:529–551PubMedCrossRef Panici PB, Angioli R (2002) Role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16:529–551PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK et al (2007) Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 109:12–19PubMedCrossRef Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK et al (2007) Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 109:12–19PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Di Re F, Baiocchi G (2000) Value of lymph node assessment in ovarian cancer: status of the art at the end of the second millennium. Int J Gynecol Cancer 10:435–442PubMedCrossRef Di Re F, Baiocchi G (2000) Value of lymph node assessment in ovarian cancer: status of the art at the end of the second millennium. Int J Gynecol Cancer 10:435–442PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Spirtos NM, Gross GM, Freddo JL et al (1995) Cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary: the impact of aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 56:345–352PubMedCrossRef Spirtos NM, Gross GM, Freddo JL et al (1995) Cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary: the impact of aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 56:345–352PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N et al (2005) Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:560–566PubMedCrossRef Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N et al (2005) Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:560–566PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M et al (1991) Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 40:103–106PubMedCrossRef Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M et al (1991) Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 40:103–106PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sakuragi N, Yamada H, Oikawa M et al (2000) Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and clear cell histology in ovarian carcinoma limited to the pelvis (pT1M0 and pT2M0). Gynecol Oncol 79:251–255PubMedCrossRef Sakuragi N, Yamada H, Oikawa M et al (2000) Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and clear cell histology in ovarian carcinoma limited to the pelvis (pT1M0 and pT2M0). Gynecol Oncol 79:251–255PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Petru E, Lahousen M, Tamussino K et al (1994) Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:656–662PubMedCrossRef Petru E, Lahousen M, Tamussino K et al (1994) Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:656–662PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cliby WA, Aletti GD, Wilson TO et al (2006) Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only? Gynecol Oncol 103:797–801PubMedCrossRef Cliby WA, Aletti GD, Wilson TO et al (2006) Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only? Gynecol Oncol 103:797–801PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al (2007) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al (2007) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:1238–1244PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Suzuki M, Ohwada M, Yamada T et al (2000) Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 79:305–308PubMedCrossRef Suzuki M, Ohwada M, Yamada T et al (2000) Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 79:305–308PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yokota H et al (1996) Assessment of metastases to aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A proposal for essential sites for lymph node biopsy. Cancer 78:803–808PubMedCrossRef Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yokota H et al (1996) Assessment of metastases to aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A proposal for essential sites for lymph node biopsy. Cancer 78:803–808PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Winter-Roach BA, Kitchener HC, Dickinson HO (2009) Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004706 Winter-Roach BA, Kitchener HC, Dickinson HO (2009) Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004706
20.
go back to reference Trope C, Kaern J (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ovarian cancer: review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 25:2909–2920PubMedCrossRef Trope C, Kaern J (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ovarian cancer: review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 25:2909–2920PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Trimbos JB, Parmar M, Vergote I et al (2003) International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm trial 1 and Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm trial: two parallel randomized phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:105–112PubMedCrossRef Trimbos JB, Parmar M, Vergote I et al (2003) International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm trial 1 and Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm trial: two parallel randomized phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:105–112PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group
Authors
Takafumi Oshita
Hiroaki Itamochi
Ryuichiro Nishimura
Fumitaka Numa
Kazuhiro Takehara
Masamichi Hiura
Hirotoshi Tanimoto
Jun Noma
Ryoji Hayase
Akihiro Murakami
Hideo Fujimoto
Yasunobu Kanamori
Fuminori Kitada
Keiji Shitsukawa
Makoto Nagaji
Yukihisa Minagawa
Michihisa Fujiwara
Junzo Kigawa
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-012-0483-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine