Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2017

Open Access 01-07-2017 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Effect of Extending the Original Eligibility Criteria for the CROSS Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Toxicity and Survival in Esophageal Cancer

Authors: E. C. de Heer, BSc, J. B. Hulshoff, MD, D. Klerk, J. G. M. Burgerhof, MSc, D. J. A. de Groot, MD, PhD, J. Th. M. Plukker, MD, PhD, G. A. P. Hospers, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with curable esophageal cancer (EC) who proceed beyond the original Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) eligibility criteria are also treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study assessed the effect that extending the CROSS eligibility criteria for nCRT has on treatment-related toxicity and overall survival (OS) in EC.

Methods

The study enrolled 161 patients with locally advanced EC (T1N1-3/T2-4aN0-3/M0) treated with the CROSS schedule followed by esophagectomy. Group 1 consisted of 89 patients who met the CROSS criteria, and group 2 consisted of 72 patients who met the extended eligibility criteria, i.e. a tumor length greater than 8 cm (n = 24), more than 10% weight loss (n = 35), more than 2–4 cm extension in the stomach (n = 21), celiac lymph node metastasis (n = 13), and/or age over 75 years (n = 2). The study assessed the differences in nCRT-associated toxicity [National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3] and 90-day postoperative mortality. Moreover, the prognostic value for OS was assessed with multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results

No difference was found in nCRT-associated toxicity (P = 0.117), postoperative complications (P = 0.783), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.492). The OS differed significantly (P = 0.004), with a median of 37.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4–64.2 months] for group 1 and 17.2 months (95% CI 13.8–20.7 months) for group 2. Pathologic N stage (P = 0.023), pathologic T stage (P = 0.043), and group 2 (P = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusions

Extension of the CROSS study eligibility criteria for nCRT did not affect nCRT-associated toxicity, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality, but was prognostic for OS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS);long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS);long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
4.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2009. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2009.
5.
go back to reference Schrauwen RWM, Bisseling TM, Bonenkamp JJ, Radema SA, Rütten H, Rosman C, et al. Uitkomsten van neoadjuvante chemoradiotherapie gevolgd door slokdarmresectie bij patiënten met een hogere leeftijd of een grotere tumorlengte. NTvO. 2015;12:50–7. Schrauwen RWM, Bisseling TM, Bonenkamp JJ, Radema SA, Rütten H, Rosman C, et al. Uitkomsten van neoadjuvante chemoradiotherapie gevolgd door slokdarmresectie bij patiënten met een hogere leeftijd of een grotere tumorlengte. NTvO. 2015;12:50–7.
7.
go back to reference Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:681–92.CrossRefPubMed Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:681–92.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Blom RL, van Heijl M, Klinkenbijl JH, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy does not increase morbidity in patients over 70. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:510–16.CrossRefPubMed Blom RL, van Heijl M, Klinkenbijl JH, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy does not increase morbidity in patients over 70. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:510–16.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference van Meerten E, Muller K, Tilanus HW, et al. Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with oesophageal cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1389–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Meerten E, Muller K, Tilanus HW, et al. Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with oesophageal cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1389–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Davies L, Lewis WG, Arnold DT, et al. Prognostic significance of age in the radical treatment of oesophageal cancer with surgery or chemoradiotherapy: a prospective observational cohort study. Clin Oncol. 2010;22:578–85.CrossRef Davies L, Lewis WG, Arnold DT, et al. Prognostic significance of age in the radical treatment of oesophageal cancer with surgery or chemoradiotherapy: a prospective observational cohort study. Clin Oncol. 2010;22:578–85.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Honing J, Smit JK, Muijs CT, et al. A comparison of carboplatin and paclitaxel with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil in definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:638–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Honing J, Smit JK, Muijs CT, et al. A comparison of carboplatin and paclitaxel with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil in definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:638–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Shao MS, Wong AT, Schwartz D, Weiner JP, Schreiber D. Definitive or preoperative chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer: patterns of care and survival outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2148–54.CrossRefPubMed Shao MS, Wong AT, Schwartz D, Weiner JP, Schreiber D. Definitive or preoperative chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer: patterns of care and survival outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2148–54.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gwynne S, Hurt C, Evans M, Holden C, Vout L, Crosby T. Definitive chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: a standard of care in patients with non-metastatic oesophageal cancer. Clin Oncol. 2011;23:182–8.CrossRef Gwynne S, Hurt C, Evans M, Holden C, Vout L, Crosby T. Definitive chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: a standard of care in patients with non-metastatic oesophageal cancer. Clin Oncol. 2011;23:182–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hofstetter W, Correa AM, Bekele N, et al. Proposed modification of nodal status in AJCC esophageal cancer staging system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:365–73.CrossRefPubMed Hofstetter W, Correa AM, Bekele N, et al. Proposed modification of nodal status in AJCC esophageal cancer staging system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:365–73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Talsma K, van Hagen P, Grotenhuis BA, Steyerberg EW, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2142–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Talsma K, van Hagen P, Grotenhuis BA, Steyerberg EW, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2142–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Sepesi B, Schmidt HE, Lada M, et al. Survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing trimodality therapy is independent of regional lymph node location. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1075–81.CrossRefPubMed Sepesi B, Schmidt HE, Lada M, et al. Survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing trimodality therapy is independent of regional lymph node location. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1075–81.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stiekema J, Vermeulen D, Vegt E, et al. Detecting interval metastases and response assessment using 18F-FDG PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:862–7.CrossRefPubMed Stiekema J, Vermeulen D, Vegt E, et al. Detecting interval metastases and response assessment using 18F-FDG PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:862–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of Extending the Original Eligibility Criteria for the CROSS Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Toxicity and Survival in Esophageal Cancer
Authors
E. C. de Heer, BSc
J. B. Hulshoff, MD
D. Klerk
J. G. M. Burgerhof, MSc
D. J. A. de Groot, MD, PhD
J. Th. M. Plukker, MD, PhD
G. A. P. Hospers, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2017 Go to the issue