Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2012

Open Access 01-07-2012 | Thoracic Oncology

Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer

Authors: Koen Talsma, MD, Pieter van Hagen, MD, Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, MD, PhD, Ewout W. Steyerberg, PhD, Hugo W. Tilanus, MD, PhD, Jan J. B. van Lanschot, MD, PhD, Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The new 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control–American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC-AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is the ratification of data-driven recommendations from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Generalizability remains questionable for single institutions. The present study serves as a validation of the 7th edition of the TNM system in a prospective cohort of patients with predominantly adenocarcinomas from a single institution.

Methods

Included were patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent between 1991 and 2008 for invasive carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, patients after a noncurative resection and patients who died in the hospital. Tumors were staged according to both the 6th and the 7th editions of the UICC-AJCC staging systems. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed with a Cox regression model. The likelihood ratio chi-square test related to the Cox regression model and the Akaike information criterion were used for measuring goodness of fit.

Results

A study population of 358 patients was identified. All patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma. Overall 5-year survival rate was 38%. Univariate analysis revealed that pT stage, pN stage, and pM stage significantly predicted overall survival. Prediction was best for the 7th edition, stratifying for all substages.

Conclusions

The application of the 7th UICC-AJCC staging system results in a better prognostic stratification of overall survival compared to the 6th edition. The fact that the 7th edition performs better predominantly in patients with adenocarcinomas who underwent a transhiatal surgical approach, in addition to findings from earlier research in other cohorts, supports its generalizability for different esophageal cancer practices.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lagarde SM, Franssen SJ, van Werven JR, et al. Patient preferences for the disclosure of prognosis after esophagectomy for cancer with curative intent. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3289–98.PubMedCrossRef Lagarde SM, Franssen SJ, van Werven JR, et al. Patient preferences for the disclosure of prognosis after esophagectomy for cancer with curative intent. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3289–98.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
3.
go back to reference Thompson SK, Ruszkiewicz AR, Jamieson GG, et al. Improving the accuracy of TNM staging in esophageal cancer: a pathological review of resected specimens. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3447–58.PubMedCrossRef Thompson SK, Ruszkiewicz AR, Jamieson GG, et al. Improving the accuracy of TNM staging in esophageal cancer: a pathological review of resected specimens. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3447–58.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, Iizuka T. Evaluation of the new (1987) TNM classification for thoracic esophageal tumors. Int J Cancer. 1993;53:220–3.PubMedCrossRef Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, Iizuka T. Evaluation of the new (1987) TNM classification for thoracic esophageal tumors. Int J Cancer. 1993;53:220–3.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes. Ann Surg. 2008;248:979–85.PubMedCrossRef Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes. Ann Surg. 2008;248:979–85.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rusch VW, Rice TW, Crowley J, Blackstone EH, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P. The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Staging Manuals: the new era of data-driven revisions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:819–21.PubMedCrossRef Rusch VW, Rice TW, Crowley J, Blackstone EH, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P. The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Staging Manuals: the new era of data-driven revisions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:819–21.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:1–8.PubMedCrossRef Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:1–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hsu PK, Wu YC, Chou TY, Huang CS, Hsu WH. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor–node–metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1024–31.PubMedCrossRef Hsu PK, Wu YC, Chou TY, Huang CS, Hsu WH. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor–node–metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1024–31.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gaur P, Hofstetter WL, Bekele BN, et al. Comparison between established and the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration staging systems. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1797–803, 1804 e1791–3. Gaur P, Hofstetter WL, Bekele BN, et al. Comparison between established and the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration staging systems. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1797–803, 1804 e1791–3.
10.
go back to reference Armitage P, Colton T. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: Wiley; 1998. Armitage P, Colton T. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: Wiley; 1998.
11.
go back to reference Kee KM, Wang JH, Lee CM, et al. Validation of clinical AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 5,613 cases from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:2650–5.PubMedCrossRef Kee KM, Wang JH, Lee CM, et al. Validation of clinical AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 5,613 cases from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:2650–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Koppert LB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS). BMC Surg. 2008;8:21.PubMedCrossRef van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Koppert LB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS). BMC Surg. 2008;8:21.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eloubeidi MA, Wallace MB, Hoffman BJ, et al. Predictors of survival for esophageal cancer patients with and without celiac axis lymphadenopathy: impact of staging endosonography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:212–9.PubMedCrossRef Eloubeidi MA, Wallace MB, Hoffman BJ, et al. Predictors of survival for esophageal cancer patients with and without celiac axis lymphadenopathy: impact of staging endosonography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:212–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.PubMedCrossRef Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1457–9.PubMedCrossRef Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1457–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastresophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:962–72.PubMedCrossRef Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastresophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:962–72.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248:549–56.PubMedCrossRef Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248:549–56.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Westerterp M, Koppert LB, Buskens CJ, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. Virchows Arch. 2005;446:497–504.PubMedCrossRef Westerterp M, Koppert LB, Buskens CJ, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. Virchows Arch. 2005;446:497–504.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1604–8.PubMedCrossRef Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1604–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:46–50.PubMedCrossRef Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:46–50.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peters CJ, Hardwick RH, Vowler SL, Fitzgerald RC. Generation and validation of a revised classification for esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2009;96:724–33.PubMedCrossRef Peters CJ, Hardwick RH, Vowler SL, Fitzgerald RC. Generation and validation of a revised classification for esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2009;96:724–33.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Grotenhuis BA, Poley JW, Wijnhoven BPL. Preoperative assessment of tumor location ands station-specific lymph nodal status is inaccurate in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (in press). Grotenhuis BA, Poley JW, Wijnhoven BPL. Preoperative assessment of tumor location ands station-specific lymph nodal status is inaccurate in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (in press).
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer
Authors
Koen Talsma, MD
Pieter van Hagen, MD
Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, MD, PhD
Ewout W. Steyerberg, PhD
Hugo W. Tilanus, MD, PhD
Jan J. B. van Lanschot, MD, PhD
Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2218-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2012 Go to the issue