Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2013

Open Access 01-11-2013 | Breast Oncology

Clinically Meaningful Tumor Reduction Rates Vary by Prechemotherapy MRI Phenotype and Tumor Subtype in the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657)

Authors: Rita A. Mukhtar, Christina Yau, Mark Rosen, Vickram J. Tandon, Nola Hylton, Laura J. Esserman, The I-SPY 1 TRIAL and ACRIN 6657 Investigators

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to determine (1) rates of clinically meaningful tumor reduction in breast tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), (2) which receptor subtypes and MRI phenotypes are associated with clinically meaningful tumor reduction, and (3) whether MRI phenotype impacts concordance between pathologic and MRI size.

Methods

We analyzed data from the I-SPY TRIAL, a multicenter, prospective NAC trial. Reduction in tumor size from >4 to ≤4 cm was considered clinically meaningful, as crossing this threshold was considered a reasonable cutoff for potential breast conservation therapy (BCT). MRI phenotypes were scored between one (well-defined) and five (diffuse) on pre-NAC MRIs.

Results

Of 174 patients with tumors >4 cm, 141 (81 %) had clinically meaningful tumor reduction. Response to therapy varied by MRI phenotype (p = 0.003), with well-defined phenotypes more likely than diffuse phenotypes to have clinically meaningful tumor shrinkage (91 vs. 72 %, p = 0.037). Her2+ and triple-negative (Tneg) tumors had the highest rate of clinically meaningful tumor reduction (p = 0.005). The concordance between tumor diameter on MRI and surgical pathology was highest for Her2+ and Tneg tumors, especially among tumors with solid imaging phenotypes (p = 0.004).

Discussion

NAC allows most patients with large breast tumors to have clinically meaningful tumor reduction, meaning response that would impact ability to undergo BCT. However, response varies by imaging and tumor subtypes. Concordance between tumor size on MRI and surgical pathology was higher in well-defined tumors, especially those with a Tneg subtype, and lower in HR+ diffuse tumors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, et al. Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:1049–62.PubMedCrossRef Esserman LJ, et al. Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:1049–62.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, et al. Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL–CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3242–9.PubMedCrossRef Esserman LJ, et al. Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL–CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3242–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fisher B, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(8):2672–85.PubMed Fisher B, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(8):2672–85.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wolmark N, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96–102.PubMedCrossRef Wolmark N, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96–102.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rastogi P, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):778–85.PubMedCrossRef Rastogi P, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(5):778–85.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hortobagyi GN, et al. Multimodal treatment of locoregionally advanced breast cancer. Cancer. 1983;51(5):763–8.PubMedCrossRef Hortobagyi GN, et al. Multimodal treatment of locoregionally advanced breast cancer. Cancer. 1983;51(5):763–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shenoy HG, et al. Practical advice on clinical decision making during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Surg Oncol. 2009;18(1):65–71.PubMedCrossRef Shenoy HG, et al. Practical advice on clinical decision making during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Surg Oncol. 2009;18(1):65–71.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Caldon LJ, Walters SJ, Reed MW. Changing trends in the decision-making preferences of women with early breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95(3):312–8.PubMedCrossRef Caldon LJ, Walters SJ, Reed MW. Changing trends in the decision-making preferences of women with early breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95(3):312–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chen JH, et al. Impact of MRI-evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy response on change of surgical recommendation in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):448–54.PubMedCrossRef Chen JH, et al. Impact of MRI-evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy response on change of surgical recommendation in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):448–54.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, and eligibility for breast-conserving surgery: promises and pitfalls. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010;19(3):475–92.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, and eligibility for breast-conserving surgery: promises and pitfalls. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010;19(3):475–92.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: primum non nocere. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(2):240–1.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: primum non nocere. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(2):240–1.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Houssami N, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3248–58.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3248–58.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kwong MS, et al. Postchemotherapy MRI overestimates residual disease compared with histopathology in responders to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer J. 2006;12(3):212–21.PubMedCrossRef Kwong MS, et al. Postchemotherapy MRI overestimates residual disease compared with histopathology in responders to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer J. 2006;12(3):212–21.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, et al. Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):257–64.PubMedCrossRef Chagpar AB, et al. Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):257–64.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bhattacharyya M, et al. Using MRI to plan breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(2):289–93.PubMedCrossRef Bhattacharyya M, et al. Using MRI to plan breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(2):289–93.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McLaughlin R, Hylton N. MRI in breast cancer therapy monitoring. NMR Biomed. 2011;24(6):712–20.PubMed McLaughlin R, Hylton N. MRI in breast cancer therapy monitoring. NMR Biomed. 2011;24(6):712–20.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Lorenzon M, et al. Assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: is volumetric MRI a reliable tool? Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(1):82–8.PubMedCrossRef Lorenzon M, et al. Assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: is volumetric MRI a reliable tool? Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(1):82–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Stucky CC, et al. Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2009;198(4):547–52.PubMedCrossRef Stucky CC, et al. Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2009;198(4):547–52.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee JM, et al. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(2):473–80.PubMedCrossRef Lee JM, et al. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(2):473–80.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Esserman L, et al. MRI phenotype is associated with response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(6):549–59.PubMedCrossRef Esserman L, et al. MRI phenotype is associated with response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(6):549–59.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hylton NM, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. Radiology. 2012;263(3):663–672.PubMedCrossRef Hylton NM, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. Radiology. 2012;263(3):663–672.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Symmans WF, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4414–22.PubMedCrossRef Symmans WF, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4414–22.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fisher B, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Citation classic: use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Curr Contents Arts Humanit. 1987(40):20. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Citation classic: use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Curr Contents Arts Humanit. 1987(40):20.
25.
go back to reference Pearson K. On the theory of contingency and its relation to association and normal correlation. London: Dulau and Co.; 1904. p 35. Pearson K. On the theory of contingency and its relation to association and normal correlation. London: Dulau and Co.; 1904. p 35.
26.
go back to reference Gomez R, et al. Preliminary results from I-SPY trial: tumor patterns on pre-treatment MRI predict breast conservation therapy eligibility. In: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007: San Antonio, TX. Gomez R, et al. Preliminary results from I-SPY trial: tumor patterns on pre-treatment MRI predict breast conservation therapy eligibility. In: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007: San Antonio, TX.
27.
go back to reference McGuire KP, et al. MRI staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: does tumor biology affect accuracy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3149–54.PubMedCrossRef McGuire KP, et al. MRI staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: does tumor biology affect accuracy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3149–54.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Livasy CA, et al. Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2006;19(2):264–71.PubMedCrossRef Livasy CA, et al. Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2006;19(2):264–71.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fulford LG, et al. Specific morphological features predictive for the basal phenotype in grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Histopathology. 2006;49(1):22–34.PubMedCrossRef Fulford LG, et al. Specific morphological features predictive for the basal phenotype in grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Histopathology. 2006;49(1):22–34.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Chen JH, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: MRI features in 29 patients. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(12):2042–3.PubMedCrossRef Chen JH, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: MRI features in 29 patients. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(12):2042–3.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology. 2009;250(3):638–47.PubMedCrossRef Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology. 2009;250(3):638–47.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wang Y, et al. Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology. 2008;246(2):367–75.PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, et al. Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology. 2008;246(2):367–75.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wang X, et al. The mammographic correlations with basal-like phenotype of invasive breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(3):333–9.PubMedCrossRef Wang X, et al. The mammographic correlations with basal-like phenotype of invasive breast cancer. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(3):333–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Chen JH, et al. MRI evaluation of pathologically complete response and residual tumors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2008;112(1):17–26.PubMedCrossRef Chen JH, et al. MRI evaluation of pathologically complete response and residual tumors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2008;112(1):17–26.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Straver ME, et al. MRI-model to guide the surgical treatment in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2010;251(4):701–7.PubMedCrossRef Straver ME, et al. MRI-model to guide the surgical treatment in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2010;251(4):701–7.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Loo CE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):660–6.PubMedCrossRef Loo CE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):660–6.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Nakahara H, et al. MR and US imaging for breast cancer patients who underwent conservation surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of triple negative breast cancer and other intrinsic subtypes. Breast Cancer. 2010;18(3):152–60. Nakahara H, et al. MR and US imaging for breast cancer patients who underwent conservation surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of triple negative breast cancer and other intrinsic subtypes. Breast Cancer. 2010;18(3):152–60.
38.
go back to reference Moon HG, et al. Age and HER2 expression status affect MRI accuracy in predicting residual tumor extent after neo-adjuvant systemic treatment. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(4):636–41.PubMedCrossRef Moon HG, et al. Age and HER2 expression status affect MRI accuracy in predicting residual tumor extent after neo-adjuvant systemic treatment. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(4):636–41.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(28):4603–10.PubMedCrossRef Esserman LJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(28):4603–10.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kumar AS, et al. Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg. 2006;192(4):520–4.PubMedCrossRef Kumar AS, et al. Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg. 2006;192(4):520–4.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Mamounas EP. NSABP Protocol B-27. Preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by preoperative or postoperative docetaxel. Oncology (Williston Park). 1997;11(6 Suppl 6):37–40.PubMed Mamounas EP. NSABP Protocol B-27. Preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by preoperative or postoperative docetaxel. Oncology (Williston Park). 1997;11(6 Suppl 6):37–40.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Fangberget A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(6):1188–99.PubMedCrossRef Fangberget A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(6):1188–99.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Wasser K, et al. Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(6):1213–23.PubMed Wasser K, et al. Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(6):1213–23.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Alvarado M, et al. Predictors of local recurrence in high-risk patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the ISPY trial. In: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. 2010. San Antonio, TX. Alvarado M, et al. Predictors of local recurrence in high-risk patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the ISPY trial. In: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. 2010. San Antonio, TX.
45.
go back to reference Kim HJ, et al. Accuracy of MRI for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: relation to response patterns on MRI. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(7):996–1003.PubMedCrossRef Kim HJ, et al. Accuracy of MRI for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: relation to response patterns on MRI. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(7):996–1003.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinically Meaningful Tumor Reduction Rates Vary by Prechemotherapy MRI Phenotype and Tumor Subtype in the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657)
Authors
Rita A. Mukhtar
Christina Yau
Mark Rosen
Vickram J. Tandon
Nola Hylton
Laura J. Esserman
The I-SPY 1 TRIAL and ACRIN 6657 Investigators
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3038-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2013 Go to the issue