Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012

Open Access 01-04-2012 | Clinical trial

Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657)

Authors: Laura J. Esserman, Donald A. Berry, Maggie C. U. Cheang, Christina Yau, Charles M. Perou, Lisa Carey, Angela DeMichele, Joe W. Gray, Kathleen Conway-Dorsey, Marc E. Lenburg, Meredith B. Buxton, Sarah E. Davis, Laura J. van’t Veer, Clifford Hudis, Koei Chin, Denise Wolf, Helen Krontiras, Leslie Montgomery, Debu Tripathy, Constance Lehman, Minetta C. Liu, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Hope S. Rugo, John T. Carpenter, Chad Livasy, Lynn Dressler, David Chhieng, Baljit Singh, Carolyn Mies, Joseph Rabban, Yunni-Yi Chen, Dilip Giri, Alfred Au, Nola Hylton, The I-SPY 1 TRIAL Investigators

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer allows individual tumor response to be assessed depending on molecular subtype, and to judge the impact of response to therapy on recurrence-free survival (RFS). The multicenter I-SPY 1 TRIAL evaluated patients with ≥3 cm tumors by using early imaging and molecular signatures, with outcomes of pathologic complete response (pCR) and RFS. The current analysis was performed using data from patients who had molecular profiles and did not receive trastuzumab. The various molecular classifiers tested were highly correlated. Categorization of breast cancer by molecular signatures enhanced the ability of pCR to predict improvement in RFS compared to the population as a whole. In multivariate analysis, the molecular signatures that added to the ability of HR and HER2 receptors, clinical stage, and pCR in predicting RFS included 70-gene signature, wound healing signature, p53 mutation signature, and PAM50 risk of recurrence. The low risk signatures were associated with significantly better prognosis, and also identified additional patients with a good prognosis within the no pCR group, primarily in the hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative subgroup. The I-SPY 1 population is enriched for tumors with a poor prognosis but is still heterogeneous in terms of rates of pCR and RFS. The ability of pCR to predict RFS is better by subset than it is for the whole group. Molecular markers improve prediction of RFS by identifying additional patients with excellent prognosis within the no pCR group.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Van’t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009PubMedCrossRef van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Van’t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734PubMedCrossRef Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cheang MC, Chia Sk, Boduc D et al (2009) Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:736–750PubMedCrossRef Cheang MC, Chia Sk, Boduc D et al (2009) Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:736–750PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF et al (2005) Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11:5678–5685PubMedCrossRef Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF et al (2005) Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11:5678–5685PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L et al (2007) The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13:2329–2334PubMedCrossRef Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L et al (2007) The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13:2329–2334PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, van’t Veer LJ, Perou CM et al (2009) Biology of breast cancers that present as interval cancers and at young age should inform how we approach early detection and prevention. Cancer Res 69:2 (suppl 1; abstr 6034) Esserman LJ, van’t Veer LJ, Perou CM et al (2009) Biology of breast cancers that present as interval cancers and at young age should inform how we approach early detection and prevention. Cancer Res 69:2 (suppl 1; abstr 6034)
8.
go back to reference Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E et al (1997) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18. J Clin Oncol 15:2483–2493PubMed Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E et al (1997) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18. J Clin Oncol 15:2483–2493PubMed
9.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C et al (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422PubMedCrossRef Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C et al (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE et al (2006) Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 24:2019–2027PubMedCrossRef Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE et al (2006) Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 24:2019–2027PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H et al (2010) First results of the NeoALTO Trial (BIG 01-06EGF 106903): a phase III, randomized, open label, neoadjuvant study of lapatinib, trastuzumab, and their combination plus paclitaxel in women with HER2-positivie primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 70:24 (suppl 2; abstr S3-3) Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H et al (2010) First results of the NeoALTO Trial (BIG 01-06EGF 106903): a phase III, randomized, open label, neoadjuvant study of lapatinib, trastuzumab, and their combination plus paclitaxel in women with HER2-positivie primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 70:24 (suppl 2; abstr S3-3)
12.
go back to reference Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE et al (2010) Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + trastuzumab treatment predicts survival and detects a patient subgroup at high need for improvement of anti-HER2 therapy. Three year medican follow-up data of the TECHNO Trial. Cancer Res 70:24 (suppl 2; abstr P1-11-03) Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE et al (2010) Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + trastuzumab treatment predicts survival and detects a patient subgroup at high need for improvement of anti-HER2 therapy. Three year medican follow-up data of the TECHNO Trial. Cancer Res 70:24 (suppl 2; abstr P1-11-03)
13.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, Berry DA, DeMichele A, Carey L, Davis SE, Buxton MB, Hudis C, Gray J, Perou C, Yau C, Livasy C, Krontiras H, Montgomery L, Tripathy D, Lehman C, Liu MC, Olopade OI, Rugo HS, Carpenter JT, Dressler L, Chhieng D, Singh B, Mies C, Rabban J, Chen Y-Y, Giri D, van ’t Veer, Hylton N, on behalf of the I-SPY 1 TRIAL Investigators (2012) Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657. J Clin Oncol (in press) Esserman LJ, Berry DA, DeMichele A, Carey L, Davis SE, Buxton MB, Hudis C, Gray J, Perou C, Yau C, Livasy C, Krontiras H, Montgomery L, Tripathy D, Lehman C, Liu MC, Olopade OI, Rugo HS, Carpenter JT, Dressler L, Chhieng D, Singh B, Mies C, Rabban J, Chen Y-Y, Giri D, van ’t Veer, Hylton N, on behalf of the I-SPY 1 TRIAL Investigators (2012) Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657. J Clin Oncol (in press)
14.
go back to reference Hylton NM, Blume J, Bernreuter W et al Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for women with locally-advanced breast cancer: results from the ACRIN 6657/I-SPY Trial. Radiology (in press) Hylton NM, Blume J, Bernreuter W et al Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for women with locally-advanced breast cancer: results from the ACRIN 6657/I-SPY Trial. Radiology (in press)
15.
go back to reference Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M et al (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11:155–168PubMed Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M et al (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11:155–168PubMed
16.
go back to reference Livasy C, Carey L, DeMichele A et al (2009) Biomarkers associated with pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer: results from the I-SPY TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012 & ACRIN 6657). Cancer Res 69:2 (suppl 1; abstr 5102) Livasy C, Carey L, DeMichele A et al (2009) Biomarkers associated with pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer: results from the I-SPY TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012 & ACRIN 6657). Cancer Res 69:2 (suppl 1; abstr 5102)
17.
go back to reference Spyratos F, Ferrero-Pous M, Trassard M et al (2002) Correlation between MIB-1 and other proliferation markers: clinical implications of the MIB-1 cutoff value. Cancer 94(8):2151–2159PubMedCrossRef Spyratos F, Ferrero-Pous M, Trassard M et al (2002) Correlation between MIB-1 and other proliferation markers: clinical implications of the MIB-1 cutoff value. Cancer 94(8):2151–2159PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genomics 7:96PubMedCrossRef Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genomics 7:96PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC et al (2009) Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 27:1160–1167PubMedCrossRef Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC et al (2009) Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 27:1160–1167PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijer MJ et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536CrossRef van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijer MJ et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Glas AM, Floore A, Delahaye JL et al (2006) Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC Genomics 7:278PubMedCrossRef Glas AM, Floore A, Delahaye JL et al (2006) Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC Genomics 7:278PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chang HY, Nuyten DS, Sneddon JB et al (2005) Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3738–3743PubMedCrossRef Chang HY, Nuyten DS, Sneddon JB et al (2005) Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3738–3743PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Troester MA, Herschkowitz JI, Oh DS et al (2006) Gene expression patterns associated with p53 status in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 6:276PubMedCrossRef Troester MA, Herschkowitz JI, Oh DS et al (2006) Gene expression patterns associated with p53 status in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 6:276PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hardenbol P, Baner J, Jain M et al (2003) Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes. Nat Biotechnol 21:673–678PubMedCrossRef Hardenbol P, Baner J, Jain M et al (2003) Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes. Nat Biotechnol 21:673–678PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hardenbol P, Yu F, Belmont J et al (2005) Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay. Genome Res 15:269–275PubMedCrossRef Hardenbol P, Yu F, Belmont J et al (2005) Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay. Genome Res 15:269–275PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ji H, Kumm J, Zhang M et al (2006) Molecular inversion probe analysis of gene copy alterations reveals distinct categories of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res 66:7910–7919PubMedCrossRef Ji H, Kumm J, Zhang M et al (2006) Molecular inversion probe analysis of gene copy alterations reveals distinct categories of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res 66:7910–7919PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES, Lucito R et al (2004) Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5(4):557–572PubMedCrossRef Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES, Lucito R et al (2004) Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5(4):557–572PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Conway K, Edmiston SN, Cui L et al (2002) Prevalence and spectrum of p53 mutations associated with smoking in breast cancer. Cancer Res 62:1987–1995PubMed Conway K, Edmiston SN, Cui L et al (2002) Prevalence and spectrum of p53 mutations associated with smoking in breast cancer. Cancer Res 62:1987–1995PubMed
29.
go back to reference Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Constantino JP et al (2007) Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol 25:2127–2132PubMedCrossRef Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Constantino JP et al (2007) Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol 25:2127–2132PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R, A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3):299–314CrossRef Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R, A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3):299–314CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8418–8423PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8418–8423PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lin C, Buxton MB, Moore D et al (2011) Locally advanced breast cancer are more likely to present as interval cancers: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657, InterSPORE Trial). Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1670-4 Lin C, Buxton MB, Moore D et al (2011) Locally advanced breast cancer are more likely to present as interval cancers: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657, InterSPORE Trial). Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-011-1670-4
33.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460–469PubMed Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460–469PubMed
34.
go back to reference Berry DA, Cirrincinoe C, Henderson IC et al (2006) Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA 295:1658–1667PubMedCrossRef Berry DA, Cirrincinoe C, Henderson IC et al (2006) Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA 295:1658–1667PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1183–1192PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1183–1192PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence to tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826PubMedCrossRef Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence to tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Knauer M, Mook S, Rutgers EJ et al (2010) The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(3):655–661PubMedCrossRef Knauer M, Mook S, Rutgers EJ et al (2010) The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(3):655–661PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sparano JA (2006) TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). Clin Breast Cancer 7(4):347–350PubMedCrossRef Sparano JA (2006) TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). Clin Breast Cancer 7(4):347–350PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cardoso F, van’t Veer L, Rutgers EJ et al (2008) Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. J Clin Oncol 26(5):729–735PubMedCrossRef Cardoso F, van’t Veer L, Rutgers EJ et al (2008) Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. J Clin Oncol 26(5):729–735PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Condeelis J, Pollard JW (2006) Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell 124(2):263–266PubMedCrossRef Condeelis J, Pollard JW (2006) Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell 124(2):263–266PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Coussens LM, Pollard JW (2010) Leukocytes in mammary development and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2(10):a003202 Coussens LM, Pollard JW (2010) Leukocytes in mammary development and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2(10):a003202
42.
go back to reference Mukhtar RA, Nseyo O, Campbell MJ et al (2011) Tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer as potential biomarkers for new treatments and diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 11(1):91–100PubMedCrossRef Mukhtar RA, Nseyo O, Campbell MJ et al (2011) Tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer as potential biomarkers for new treatments and diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 11(1):91–100PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, Moore DH, Tsing PJ et al (2011) Biologic markers determine both the risk and the timing of recurrence in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129(2):263–266CrossRef Esserman LJ, Moore DH, Tsing PJ et al (2011) Biologic markers determine both the risk and the timing of recurrence in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129(2):263–266CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657)
Authors
Laura J. Esserman
Donald A. Berry
Maggie C. U. Cheang
Christina Yau
Charles M. Perou
Lisa Carey
Angela DeMichele
Joe W. Gray
Kathleen Conway-Dorsey
Marc E. Lenburg
Meredith B. Buxton
Sarah E. Davis
Laura J. van’t Veer
Clifford Hudis
Koei Chin
Denise Wolf
Helen Krontiras
Leslie Montgomery
Debu Tripathy
Constance Lehman
Minetta C. Liu
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
Hope S. Rugo
John T. Carpenter
Chad Livasy
Lynn Dressler
David Chhieng
Baljit Singh
Carolyn Mies
Joseph Rabban
Yunni-Yi Chen
Dilip Giri
Alfred Au
Nola Hylton
The I-SPY 1 TRIAL Investigators
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1895-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine