Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2012

01-08-2012 | Colorectal Cancer

A Comparative Study of Voiding and Sexual Function after Total Mesorectal Excision with Autonomic Nerve Preservation for Rectal Cancer: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Surgery

Authors: Jeong Yeon Kim, MD, Nam-Kyu Kim, MD, Kang Young Lee, MD, Hyuk Hur, MD, Byung Soh Min, MD, Jang Hwan Kim, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the protection of the urogenital function after robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (R-TME) for rectal cancer compared to those of laparoscopic TME (L-TME).

Methods

69 patients who underwent L-TME (n = 39) or R-TME (n = 30) were prospectively enrolled. Their urogenital function was evaluated by uroflowmetry, a standard questionnaire of the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and the international index of erectile function (IIEF) before surgery and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The pre- and postoperative IPSS and IIEF scores were compared to detect functional deterioration by paired t test for each group. How postoperative IPSS and IIEF scores and uroflowmetry data deviated from the preoperative values (Δ) were statistically compared between the two groups.

Results

The IPSS score significantly increased 1 month after surgery; the recovery from decreased urinary function took 6 months for patients in the L-TME group (8.2 ± 6.3; P = 0.908) but 3 months in the R-TME group (8.36 ± 5.5; P = 0.075). The ΔIPSS scores were significantly different between the two groups at 3 months (P = 0.036). In male patients (L-TME 20, R-TME 18), the total IIEF score in R-TME and L-TME significantly decreased 1 month after surgery, L-TME gradually recovered over 12 months (46.00 ± 16.9; P = 0.269), but R-TME recovered within 6 months (44.61 ± 13.76; P = 0.067). The ΔIIEF score value was not significantly different at any time between the two groups, but in an itemized analysis of the change in erectile function and sexual desire, there were significant differences at 3 months between the two groups.

Conclusions

R-TME for rectal cancer is associated with earlier recovery of normal voiding and sexual function compared to patients who underwent L-TME, although this result needs to be verified by larger prospective comparative studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.PubMedCrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim NK, Aahn TW, Park JK, et al. Assessment of sexual and voiding function after total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in males with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1178–85.PubMedCrossRef Kim NK, Aahn TW, Park JK, et al. Assessment of sexual and voiding function after total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in males with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1178–85.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chang PL, Fan HA. Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma. J Urol. 1983;130:948–51.PubMed Chang PL, Fan HA. Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma. J Urol. 1983;130:948–51.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Santangelo ML, Romano G, Sassaroli C. Sexual function after resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1987;154:502–4.PubMedCrossRef Santangelo ML, Romano G, Sassaroli C. Sexual function after resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1987;154:502–4.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kinn AC, Ohman U. Bladder and sexual function after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29:43–8.PubMedCrossRef Kinn AC, Ohman U. Bladder and sexual function after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29:43–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fazio VW, Fletcher J, Montague D. Prospective study of the effect of resection of the rectum on male sexual function. World J Surg. 1980;32 4:149–52.CrossRef Fazio VW, Fletcher J, Montague D. Prospective study of the effect of resection of the rectum on male sexual function. World J Surg. 1980;32 4:149–52.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Havenga K, DeRuiter MC, Enker WE, et al. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1996;83:384–8.PubMedCrossRef Havenga K, DeRuiter MC, Enker WE, et al. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1996;83:384–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heald RJ. The “holy plane” of rectal surgery. Royal Society of Medicine (Great Britain). J R Soc Med. 1988;81:503–8.PubMed Heald RJ. The “holy plane” of rectal surgery. Royal Society of Medicine (Great Britain). J R Soc Med. 1988;81:503–8.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, et al. Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:1140–5.PubMedCrossRef Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, et al. Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:1140–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH, et al. Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg. 1998;85:92–7.PubMedCrossRef Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH, et al. Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg. 1998;85:92–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Bull-Njaa T, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:206–10.PubMedCrossRef Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Bull-Njaa T, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:206–10.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1124–32.PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1124–32.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H, et al. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:296–303.PubMedCrossRef Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H, et al. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:296–303.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Liang J, Lai H, Lee P. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1285–7.PubMedCrossRef Liang J, Lai H, Lee P. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1285–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Morino M, Parini U, Allaix ME, et al. Male sexual and urinary function after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1233–40.PubMedCrossRef Morino M, Parini U, Allaix ME, et al. Male sexual and urinary function after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1233–40.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1551–6.PubMedCrossRef Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1551–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1689–94.PubMedCrossRef Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1689–94.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, et al. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21.PubMedCrossRef Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, et al. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:792–7.PubMedCrossRef Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:792–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2162–8.PubMedCrossRef D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2162–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, et al. Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3168–73.PubMedCrossRef Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, et al. Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3168–73.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI, Ballantyne GH, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1521–5.PubMedCrossRef Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI, Ballantyne GH, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1521–5.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1627–32.PubMedCrossRef Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1627–32.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kim NK. Anatomic basis of sharp pelvic dissection for curative resection of rectal cancer Yonsei Med J. 2005;46:737–49.PubMedCrossRef Kim NK. Anatomic basis of sharp pelvic dissection for curative resection of rectal cancer Yonsei Med J. 2005;46:737–49.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1729–34.PubMedCrossRef Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1729–34.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kim NK, Kim YW, Min BS, et al. Operative safety and oncologic outcomes of anal sphincter-preserving surgery with mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: 931 consecutive patients treated at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:900–9.PubMedCrossRef Kim NK, Kim YW, Min BS, et al. Operative safety and oncologic outcomes of anal sphincter-preserving surgery with mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: 931 consecutive patients treated at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:900–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Enker WE, Havenga K, Polyak T, et al. Abdominoperineal resection via total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation for low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 1997;21:715–20.PubMedCrossRef Enker WE, Havenga K, Polyak T, et al. Abdominoperineal resection via total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation for low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 1997;21:715–20.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Comparative Study of Voiding and Sexual Function after Total Mesorectal Excision with Autonomic Nerve Preservation for Rectal Cancer: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Surgery
Authors
Jeong Yeon Kim, MD
Nam-Kyu Kim, MD
Kang Young Lee, MD
Hyuk Hur, MD
Byung Soh Min, MD
Jang Hwan Kim, MD
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2012 Go to the issue