Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Normative anthropometry and proportions of the Kenyan-African face and comparative anthropometry in relation to African Americans and North American Whites

Authors: Saurab S. Virdi, David Wertheim, Farhad B. Naini

Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is no normative craniofacial anthropometric data for the Kenyan-African population. The purpose of this investigation was to determine normative anthropometric craniofacial measurements and proportional relationships for Kenyans of African descent and to compare the data with African Americans (AA), North American Whites (NAW), and neoclassical canons.

Methods

Twenty-five direct facial anthropometric measurements, and 4 angular measurements, were taken on 72 Kenyan-African participants (age range 18–30 years) recruited at the University of Nairobi in Kenya. The data were compared with AA and NAW populations, and neoclassical canons. Descriptive statistics of the variables were computed for the study population.

Results

Significant differences between both Kenyan males and females were detected in forehead height (~ 5 mm greater for males, ~ 4.5 mm for females), nasal height (reduced by ~ 4 mm in males, ~ 3 mm in females), nasal width (8–9 mm greater), upper lip height (> 3 mm), and eye width (greater by ~ 3 mm) compared to NAW subjects. All vertical measurements obtained were significantly different compared with NAW. Differences were observed in comparison with AA subjects, but less marked. Mouth width was similar in all groups. Angular measurements were variable. Neoclassical canons did not apply to the Kenyan population.

Conclusions

Anthropometric measurements of NAW showed clear differences when compared with the Kenyan population, and variations exist with comparative AA data. The anthropometric data in terms of linear measurements, angular measurements, and proportional values described may serve as a database for facial analysis in the Kenyan-African population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naini FB (2011) Facial aesthetics: concepts and clinical diagnosis. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordCrossRef Naini FB (2011) Facial aesthetics: concepts and clinical diagnosis. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hrdlička A (1939) Practical anthropometry. Wistar Institute, Philadelphia Hrdlička A (1939) Practical anthropometry. Wistar Institute, Philadelphia
3.
go back to reference Farkas LG (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face. Raven Press, New York Farkas LG (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face. Raven Press, New York
4.
go back to reference Arslan SG, Genc C, Odabas B, Kama JD (2008) Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types. Aesth Plast Surg 32:234–242CrossRef Arslan SG, Genc C, Odabas B, Kama JD (2008) Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types. Aesth Plast Surg 32:234–242CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Naini FB, Gill DS (2017). Principles of orthognathic treatment planning. In: Naini FB, Gill DS (eds). Orthognathic surgery: Principles, planning and practice. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Naini FB, Gill DS (2017). Principles of orthognathic treatment planning. In: Naini FB, Gill DS (eds). Orthognathic surgery: Principles, planning and practice. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
6.
go back to reference Jagadish Chandra H, Ravi MS, Sharma SM, Rajendra Prasad B (2012) Standards of facial esthetics: an anthropometric study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 11:384–389CrossRef Jagadish Chandra H, Ravi MS, Sharma SM, Rajendra Prasad B (2012) Standards of facial esthetics: an anthropometric study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 11:384–389CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Khan N, Leela V, Gopalakrishna A (2012) A study of craniofacial anthropometrics in Hyderabad (Deccan) and a review of literature. J Med Allied Sci 2:54–57 Khan N, Leela V, Gopalakrishna A (2012) A study of craniofacial anthropometrics in Hyderabad (Deccan) and a review of literature. J Med Allied Sci 2:54–57
8.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR (2007) Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg 59:692–698CrossRef Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR (2007) Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg 59:692–698CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Borman H, Ozgur F, Gursu G (1999) Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults. Ann Plast Surg 42:280–288CrossRef Borman H, Ozgur F, Gursu G (1999) Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults. Ann Plast Surg 42:280–288CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR (2002) Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesth Plast Surg 26:64–69CrossRef Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR (2002) Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesth Plast Surg 26:64–69CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Salah M, Higzi MA, Ali RW, Naini FB (2014) The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:1704–1709CrossRef Salah M, Higzi MA, Ali RW, Naini FB (2014) The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:1704–1709CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wamalwa P, Amisi SK, Wang Y, Chen S (2011) Angular photogrammetric comparison of the soft-tissue facial profile of Kenyans and Chinese. J Craniofac Surg 22:1064–1072CrossRef Wamalwa P, Amisi SK, Wang Y, Chen S (2011) Angular photogrammetric comparison of the soft-tissue facial profile of Kenyans and Chinese. J Craniofac Surg 22:1064–1072CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Cheung G (1981) Facial asymmetry in healthy north American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod 51:70–77PubMed Farkas LG, Cheung G (1981) Facial asymmetry in healthy north American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod 51:70–77PubMed
14.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L (2000) Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesth Plast Surg 24:179–184CrossRef Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L (2000) Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesth Plast Surg 24:179–184CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Farkas LG (1996) Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: past, present, and future. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33:10–18CrossRef Farkas LG (1996) Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: past, present, and future. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33:10–18CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR (2005) Anthropometric proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 73 patients with forms of isolated coronal synostosis. Ann Plast Surg 55:495–499CrossRef Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR (2005) Anthropometric proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 73 patients with forms of isolated coronal synostosis. Ann Plast Surg 55:495–499CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Porter JP, Olson KL (2001) Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:191–197CrossRef Porter JP, Olson KL (2001) Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:191–197CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J (1980) Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast Reconstr Surg 66:346–355CrossRef Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J (1980) Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast Reconstr Surg 66:346–355CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jeffries JM 3rd, DiBernardo B, Rauscher GE (1995) Computer analysis of the African-American face. Ann Plast Surg 34:318–321CrossRef Jeffries JM 3rd, DiBernardo B, Rauscher GE (1995) Computer analysis of the African-American face. Ann Plast Surg 34:318–321CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Naini FB, Gill DS (2017). Patient evaluation and clinical diagnosis. In: Naini FB, Gill DS (eds). Orthognathic surgery: Principles, planning and practice. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Naini FB, Gill DS (2017). Patient evaluation and clinical diagnosis. In: Naini FB, Gill DS (eds). Orthognathic surgery: Principles, planning and practice. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
21.
go back to reference Othman SA, Majawit LP, Wan Hassan WN, Wey MC, Mohd Razi R (2016) Anthropometric study of three-dimensional facial morphology in Malay adults. PLoS One 11:e0164180CrossRef Othman SA, Majawit LP, Wan Hassan WN, Wey MC, Mohd Razi R (2016) Anthropometric study of three-dimensional facial morphology in Malay adults. PLoS One 11:e0164180CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tessier P (1987) An interview with Paul Tessier conducted by Lars M. Vistnes, M.D. Ann Plast Surg 18:352–354CrossRef Tessier P (1987) An interview with Paul Tessier conducted by Lars M. Vistnes, M.D. Ann Plast Surg 18:352–354CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jahanshahi M, Golalipour MJ, Heidari K (2008) The effect of ethnicity on facial anthropometry in Northern Iran. Singap Med J 49:940–943 Jahanshahi M, Golalipour MJ, Heidari K (2008) The effect of ethnicity on facial anthropometry in Northern Iran. Singap Med J 49:940–943
24.
go back to reference Bush K, Antonyshyn O (1996) Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:226–235CrossRef Bush K, Antonyshyn O (1996) Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:226–235CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Moss JP, Ismail SF, Hennessy RJ (2003) Three-dimensional assessment of treatment outcomes on the face. Orthod Craniofac Res 6:126–131CrossRef Moss JP, Ismail SF, Hennessy RJ (2003) Three-dimensional assessment of treatment outcomes on the face. Orthod Craniofac Res 6:126–131CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fang F, Clapham PJ, Chung KC (2011) A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:874–881CrossRef Fang F, Clapham PJ, Chung KC (2011) A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:874–881CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Broadbent TR, Mathews VL (1957) Artistic relationships in surface anatomy of the face: application to reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 20:1–17CrossRef Broadbent TR, Mathews VL (1957) Artistic relationships in surface anatomy of the face: application to reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 20:1–17CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Seghers MJ, Longacre JJ, Destefano GA (1964) The Golden proportion and beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 34:382–386CrossRef Seghers MJ, Longacre JJ, Destefano GA (1964) The Golden proportion and beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg 34:382–386CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Normative anthropometry and proportions of the Kenyan-African face and comparative anthropometry in relation to African Americans and North American Whites
Authors
Saurab S. Virdi
David Wertheim
Farhad B. Naini
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2288-8586
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0191-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue