Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research article

Acceptability and preference of three inhalation devices assessed by the Handling Questionnaire in asthma and COPD patients

Authors: Roberto W. Dal Negro, Massimiliano Povero

Published in: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The patients’ criteria of preference for inhalation devices can affect the extent of their adherence to treatment and outcomes.
Aim of this study was to assess and compare the patients’ preference and acceptability (PPA) for Breezhaler and Genuair (both Dry Powder Inhalers), and for Respimat (a Soft Mist Inhaler) in asthma and COPD out-patients by means of the Handling Questionnaire.

Methods

The Handling Questionnaire is a validated instrument which allows the investigation of different domains of PPA; it also takes into account the patients’ age and gender, together with their previous experience with the inhalation devices and their previous education approach to them. Differences in terms of preference, acceptance and usability were assessed by linear and logistic regressions in order to evaluate factors influencing the proper actuation.

Results and Discussion

Data from 333 patients were collected: Genuair and Respimat were the most liked and perceived as the easiest to use at glance by patients, but also as the least problematic according to the patients’ and nurse’s judgments. Mean number of attempts for achieving the first effective actuation was the highest with Breezhaler (2.6 vs 1.6; p <0.0001). Linear regressions showed that longer the explanation, higher was the number of attempts to the first proper actuation (0.58 additional attempts every 10 s increase in the first explanation, p <0.0001). Devices requiring less manoeuvres for the actuation were used properly after less attempts (0.38 increase in the number of attempts every additional manoeuvres, p <0.0001). Respimat proved to be the most indicated in COPD patients since it was the most liked and its successful rate at first attempt was the highest. Logistic regressions confirmed these data. Previous experience with DPIs and/or MDIs did not affect the patient preference and acceptability, independently whether suffering from asthma or COPD.

Conclusions

Substantial differences are existing in patient’s preference and acceptability for inhalation devices, mainly related to the handling and the understanding of the different devices.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cross S. Asthma inhalation delivery systems: the patient’s viewpoint. J Aersol Med. 2001;14 suppl:S3–7.CrossRef Cross S. Asthma inhalation delivery systems: the patient’s viewpoint. J Aersol Med. 2001;14 suppl:S3–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Magnussen H. Novolizer: how does it fit into inhalation therapy? Curr Med ResOpin. 2005;21 suppl.4:S39–46.CrossRefPubMed Magnussen H. Novolizer: how does it fit into inhalation therapy? Curr Med ResOpin. 2005;21 suppl.4:S39–46.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Barnes PJ. Introduction: how can we improve asthma management? Curr Res Med Opin. 2005;21 suppl.4:1–3.CrossRef Barnes PJ. Introduction: how can we improve asthma management? Curr Res Med Opin. 2005;21 suppl.4:1–3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Melani AS. Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician. Acta Biomed. 2007;78:233–45.PubMed Melani AS. Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician. Acta Biomed. 2007;78:233–45.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Newman SP, Busse WW. Evolution of dry powder inhaler design, formulation, and performance. Respir Med. 2002;96:293–304.CrossRefPubMed Newman SP, Busse WW. Evolution of dry powder inhaler design, formulation, and performance. Respir Med. 2002;96:293–304.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wieshammer S, Dreyhaupt J. Dry powder inhalers: which factors determine the frequency of handling errors? Respiration. 2008;75:18–25.CrossRefPubMed Wieshammer S, Dreyhaupt J. Dry powder inhalers: which factors determine the frequency of handling errors? Respiration. 2008;75:18–25.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chapman KR, Fogarty CM, Peckitt C, Lassen C, Jadayel D, Dedericha J, et al. Delivery characteristics and patients’ handling of two single-dose dry powder inhalers used in COPD. Int J COPD. 2011;6:353–6. Chapman KR, Fogarty CM, Peckitt C, Lassen C, Jadayel D, Dedericha J, et al. Delivery characteristics and patients’ handling of two single-dose dry powder inhalers used in COPD. Int J COPD. 2011;6:353–6.
8.
go back to reference Barrons R, Pegram A, Borrens A. Inhaler device selection: special considerations in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68:1221–32.CrossRefPubMed Barrons R, Pegram A, Borrens A. Inhaler device selection: special considerations in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68:1221–32.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Virchow JC. Guidelines versus clinical practice – which therapy and which device. Respir Med. 2004;98(suppl B):S28–34.CrossRefPubMed Virchow JC. Guidelines versus clinical practice – which therapy and which device. Respir Med. 2004;98(suppl B):S28–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Virchow JC. What plays a role in the choice of inhaler device for asthma therapy? Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;4(S):19–25.CrossRef Virchow JC. What plays a role in the choice of inhaler device for asthma therapy? Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;4(S):19–25.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Virchow JC, Crompton GK, Dal Negro RW, Pedersen S, Magnan A, Seidemberg J, et al. Importance of inhaler devices in the management of airway diseases. Respir Med. 2008;102:10–9.CrossRefPubMed Virchow JC, Crompton GK, Dal Negro RW, Pedersen S, Magnan A, Seidemberg J, et al. Importance of inhaler devices in the management of airway diseases. Respir Med. 2008;102:10–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lenney J, Innes JA, Crompton GK. Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. EDICI Respir Med. 2000;94:496–500.CrossRefPubMed Lenney J, Innes JA, Crompton GK. Inappropriate inhaler use: assessment of use and patient preference of seven inhalation devices. EDICI Respir Med. 2000;94:496–500.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Self TH, Arnold LB, Csosnowski LM, Swanson JM, Swanson H. Inadequate skill of healthcare professionals in using asthma inhalation devices. J Asthma. 2007;44:593–8.CrossRefPubMed Self TH, Arnold LB, Csosnowski LM, Swanson JM, Swanson H. Inadequate skill of healthcare professionals in using asthma inhalation devices. J Asthma. 2007;44:593–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dal Negro RW, Guerriero M. Cultural and linguistic testing of the Handling Questionnaire: a specific instrument for assessing the patient’s acceptability of dry powder inhalers. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2008;69:170–7.PubMed Dal Negro RW, Guerriero M. Cultural and linguistic testing of the Handling Questionnaire: a specific instrument for assessing the patient’s acceptability of dry powder inhalers. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2008;69:170–7.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Perpina Tordera M, Viejo JL, Sanchos J, Badia X, Cobos N. Picado C, et al Assessment of patient satisfaction and preferences with inhalers in asthma with the FSI-10 Questionnaire. Arch Broncopneumol. 2008;44:346–52.CrossRef Perpina Tordera M, Viejo JL, Sanchos J, Badia X, Cobos N. Picado C, et al Assessment of patient satisfaction and preferences with inhalers in asthma with the FSI-10 Questionnaire. Arch Broncopneumol. 2008;44:346–52.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hanada S, Wada S, Ohno T, Sawaguchi H, Muraki M, Tohda Y. Questionnaire on switching from the Tiotropium Handihaler to the Respimat inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: changes in handling and preferences immediately and several years after the switch. Int J COPD. 2015;10:69–77. Hanada S, Wada S, Ohno T, Sawaguchi H, Muraki M, Tohda Y. Questionnaire on switching from the Tiotropium Handihaler to the Respimat inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: changes in handling and preferences immediately and several years after the switch. Int J COPD. 2015;10:69–77.
18.
go back to reference Barry PW, O’Callagnan C. The influence of inhaler selection on efficacy of asthma therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Res. 2003;55:879–923.CrossRef Barry PW, O’Callagnan C. The influence of inhaler selection on efficacy of asthma therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Res. 2003;55:879–923.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Anderson P. Patient preference for and satisfaction with inhaler devices. Eur Respir Rev. 2005;96:109–16.CrossRef Anderson P. Patient preference for and satisfaction with inhaler devices. Eur Respir Rev. 2005;96:109–16.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schulte M, Osseiran K, Betz R, Wenker M, Brand P, Meyer T, et al. Handling of and preferences for available dry powder inhaler systems by patients with asthma and COPD. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2008;21:321–8.CrossRefPubMed Schulte M, Osseiran K, Betz R, Wenker M, Brand P, Meyer T, et al. Handling of and preferences for available dry powder inhaler systems by patients with asthma and COPD. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2008;21:321–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference van der Palen J, Ginko T, Kroker A, van der Valk P, Goosens M, Padullés L, et al. Preference, satisfaction an errors with two dry powder inhalers in patients with COPD. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10:1023–31.CrossRefPubMed van der Palen J, Ginko T, Kroker A, van der Valk P, Goosens M, Padullés L, et al. Preference, satisfaction an errors with two dry powder inhalers in patients with COPD. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10:1023–31.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cross R. Asthma inhalation delivery systems: the patient viewpoint. J Aerosol Med. 2001;14 suppl 1:53–7. Cross R. Asthma inhalation delivery systems: the patient viewpoint. J Aerosol Med. 2001;14 suppl 1:53–7.
23.
go back to reference Chrystin H. Do patients show the same level of adherence with all dry powder inhalers? Intern J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005;149:19–25.CrossRef Chrystin H. Do patients show the same level of adherence with all dry powder inhalers? Intern J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005;149:19–25.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference van Schayck CP, Bjil-Hofiad ID, Folgering H, Cloosterman SG, Akkermans R, van der Eishout F, et al. Influence of two different inhalation devices on therapy compliance in asthmatic patients. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002;20:126–8.CrossRefPubMed van Schayck CP, Bjil-Hofiad ID, Folgering H, Cloosterman SG, Akkermans R, van der Eishout F, et al. Influence of two different inhalation devices on therapy compliance in asthmatic patients. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002;20:126–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Hodder R, Price D. Patient preference for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:381–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hodder R, Price D. Patient preference for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:381–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Henriet AC, Marchand-Adam S, Mankikian J, Diot P. Respimat, first soft mist inhaler: new perspectives in the management of COPD. Rev Mal Respir. 2010;27:1141–9.CrossRefPubMed Henriet AC, Marchand-Adam S, Mankikian J, Diot P. Respimat, first soft mist inhaler: new perspectives in the management of COPD. Rev Mal Respir. 2010;27:1141–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ferguson GT, Ghafouri M, Dai L, Dunn LJ. COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized controlled study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:139–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferguson GT, Ghafouri M, Dai L, Dunn LJ. COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized controlled study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:139–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Lavorini F, Fontana GA. Inhaler technique and patient’s preference for dry powder inhaler devices. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11:1–3.CrossRefPubMed Lavorini F, Fontana GA. Inhaler technique and patient’s preference for dry powder inhaler devices. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11:1–3.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference der Palen JV. Genuair in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a novel, user-friendly, multidose, dry powder inhaler. Ther Deliv. 2014;5:795–806.CrossRef der Palen JV. Genuair in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a novel, user-friendly, multidose, dry powder inhaler. Ther Deliv. 2014;5:795–806.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Pascual S, Feimer J, De Soyza A, Sauleda Roig J, Haughney J, Padullès L, et al. Preference, satisfaction and critical errors with Genuair and Breezhaler inhalers in patients with COPD: a randomized, cross-over, multicenter study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015;25:15018. doi:10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pascual S, Feimer J, De Soyza A, Sauleda Roig J, Haughney J, Padullès L, et al. Preference, satisfaction and critical errors with Genuair and Breezhaler inhalers in patients with COPD: a randomized, cross-over, multicenter study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015;25:15018. doi:10.​1038/​npjpcrm.​2015.​18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Acceptability and preference of three inhalation devices assessed by the Handling Questionnaire in asthma and COPD patients
Authors
Roberto W. Dal Negro
Massimiliano Povero
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2049-6958
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-016-0044-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue

Reviewer acknowledgement

Reviewer acknowledgement 2015