Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Can a toxin gene NAAT be used to predict toxin EIA and the severity of Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors: Mark I. Garvey, Craig W. Bradley, Martyn A. C. Wilkinson, Elisabeth Holden

Published in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI) is controversial because of the many laboratory methods available and their lack of ability to distinguish between carriage, mild or severe disease. Here we describe whether a low C. difficile toxin B nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) cycle threshold (CT) can predict toxin EIA, CDI severity and mortality.

Methods

A three-stage algorithm was employed for CDI testing, comprising a screening test for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), followed by a NAAT, then a toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA). All diarrhoeal samples positive for GDH and NAAT between 2012 and 2016 were analysed. The performance of the NAAT CT value as a classifier of toxin EIA outcome was analysed using a ROC curve; patient mortality was compared to CTs and toxin EIA via linear regression models.

Results

A CT value ≤26 was associated with ≥72% toxin EIA positivity; applying a logistic regression model we demonstrated an association between low CT values and toxin EIA positivity. A CT value of ≤26 was significantly associated (p = 0.0262) with increased one month mortality, severe cases of CDI or failure of first line treatment. The ROC curve probabilities demonstrated a CT cut off value of 26.6.

Discussions

Here we demonstrate that a CT ≤26 indicates more severe CDI and is associated with higher mortality. Samples with a low CT value are often toxin EIA positive, questioning the need for this additional EIA test.

Conclusions

A CT ≤26 could be used to assess the potential for severity of CDI and guide patient treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Martin JS, Monaghan TM, Wilcox MH. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, diagnosis and understanding transmission. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:206–16.CrossRefPubMed Martin JS, Monaghan TM, Wilcox MH. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, diagnosis and understanding transmission. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:206–16.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mawer DPC, Eyre DW, Griffiths D, et al. Contribution to Clostridium difficile transmission of symptomatic patients with toxigenic strains who are fecal toxin negative. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1163–70.CrossRefPubMed Mawer DPC, Eyre DW, Griffiths D, et al. Contribution to Clostridium difficile transmission of symptomatic patients with toxigenic strains who are fecal toxin negative. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1163–70.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Polage CR, Solnick JV, Cohen SH. Toxin immunoassays and Clostridium difficile infection-reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:414–5.CrossRefPubMed Polage CR, Solnick JV, Cohen SH. Toxin immunoassays and Clostridium difficile infection-reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:414–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Planche TD, Davies KA, Coen PG, et al. Differences in outcome according to Clostridium difficile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C difficile infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:936–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Planche TD, Davies KA, Coen PG, et al. Differences in outcome according to Clostridium difficile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C difficile infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:936–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr, et al. estimating health care associated infections and deaths in US hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:160–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr, et al. estimating health care associated infections and deaths in US hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:160–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Goldenberg SD, French GL. Diagnostic testing for Clostridium difficile: a comprehensive survey of laboratories in England. J Hosp Infect. 2011;79:4–7.CrossRefPubMed Goldenberg SD, French GL. Diagnostic testing for Clostridium difficile: a comprehensive survey of laboratories in England. J Hosp Infect. 2011;79:4–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wilcox MH. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: in a state of transition or confusion or both? J Hosp Infect. 2011;79:1–3.CrossRefPubMed Wilcox MH. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: in a state of transition or confusion or both? J Hosp Infect. 2011;79:1–3.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Novak-Weekley SM, Marlowe EM, Miller JM, et al. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:889–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Novak-Weekley SM, Marlowe EM, Miller JM, et al. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:889–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Planche T, Wilcox M. Reference assays for Clostridium difficile infection: one or two gold standards? J Clin Pathol. 2011;64:1–5.CrossRefPubMed Planche T, Wilcox M. Reference assays for Clostridium difficile infection: one or two gold standards? J Clin Pathol. 2011;64:1–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Planche T, Aghaizu A, Holliman R, et al. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:777–84.CrossRefPubMed Planche T, Aghaizu A, Holliman R, et al. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:777–84.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wilcox MH, Planche T, Fang FC, Gilligan P. Point-counterpoint. What is the current role of algorithmic approaches for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection? J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:4347–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilcox MH, Planche T, Fang FC, Gilligan P. Point-counterpoint. What is the current role of algorithmic approaches for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection? J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:4347–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Reigadas E, Alcalá L, Valerio M, Marín M, Martin A, Bouza E, Toxin BPCR. Cycle threshold as a predictor of poor outcome of Clostridium difficile infection: a derivation and validation cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:1380–5.CrossRefPubMed Reigadas E, Alcalá L, Valerio M, Marín M, Martin A, Bouza E, Toxin BPCR. Cycle threshold as a predictor of poor outcome of Clostridium difficile infection: a derivation and validation cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:1380–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ticehurst JR, Aird DZ, Dam LM, et al. Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1145–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ticehurst JR, Aird DZ, Dam LM, et al. Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1145–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Eastwood K, Else P, Charlett a, Wilcox M. Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3211–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eastwood K, Else P, Charlett a, Wilcox M. Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3211–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Humphries RM, Uslan DZ, Rubin Z. Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:869–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Humphries RM, Uslan DZ, Rubin Z. Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:869–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Reller ME, Lema CA, Perl TM, et al. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3601–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reller ME, Lema CA, Perl TM, et al. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3601–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Crobach MJ, Planche T, Eckert C, et al. European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:S63–81.CrossRefPubMed Crobach MJ, Planche T, Eckert C, et al. European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:S63–81.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431–55.CrossRefPubMed Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431–55.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Davies KA, Longshaw CM, Davis GL, et al. Under diagnosis of Clostridium difficile across Europe: the European, multicentre, prospective, biannual, point-prevalence study of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea (EUCLID). Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:1208–19.CrossRefPubMed Davies KA, Longshaw CM, Davis GL, et al. Under diagnosis of Clostridium difficile across Europe: the European, multicentre, prospective, biannual, point-prevalence study of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea (EUCLID). Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:1208–19.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wren MW, Sivapalan M, Kinson R, Shetty NR. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. An evaluation of tests for faecal toxin, glutamate dehydrogenase, lactoferrin and toxigenic culture in the diagnostic laboratory. Br J Biomed Sci. 2009;66:1–5.CrossRefPubMed Wren MW, Sivapalan M, Kinson R, Shetty NR. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. An evaluation of tests for faecal toxin, glutamate dehydrogenase, lactoferrin and toxigenic culture in the diagnostic laboratory. Br J Biomed Sci. 2009;66:1–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:920–4.CrossRefPubMed Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:920–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference hmeasure package. Version 1.0. R version 3.4.0 (2017–04-21). hmeasure package. Version 1.0. R version 3.4.0 (2017–04-21).
25.
go back to reference plotROC package. Version 2.0.1. R version 3.4.0 (2017–04-21). plotROC package. Version 2.0.1. R version 3.4.0 (2017–04-21).
26.
go back to reference R version 3.4.0 (2017–04-21) -- "You Stupid Darkness”. Copyright (C) 2017 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R version 3.4.0 (2017–04-21) -- "You Stupid Darkness”. Copyright (C) 2017 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
27.
go back to reference Hand DJ. Measuring classifier performance: a coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve. Mach Learn. 2009;77:103–23.CrossRef Hand DJ. Measuring classifier performance: a coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve. Mach Learn. 2009;77:103–23.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lopez-Raton M, Rodriguez-Alvarez M, Cadarso-Suarez C, Gude-Sampedro F. OptimalCutpoints: an R package for selecting optimal Cutpoints in diagnostic tests. J Stat Soft. 2014;61:1–36.CrossRef Lopez-Raton M, Rodriguez-Alvarez M, Cadarso-Suarez C, Gude-Sampedro F. OptimalCutpoints: an R package for selecting optimal Cutpoints in diagnostic tests. J Stat Soft. 2014;61:1–36.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dionne LL, Raymond F, Corbeil J, Longtin J, Gervais P, Longtin Y. Correlation between Clostridium difficile bacterial load, commercial real-time PCR cycle thresholds, and results of diagnostic tests based on enzyme immunoassay and cell culture cytotoxicity assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3624–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dionne LL, Raymond F, Corbeil J, Longtin J, Gervais P, Longtin Y. Correlation between Clostridium difficile bacterial load, commercial real-time PCR cycle thresholds, and results of diagnostic tests based on enzyme immunoassay and cell culture cytotoxicity assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3624–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Eyre DW, Fawley WN, Rajgopal A, et al. Comparison of control of Clostridium Difficile infection in six English hospitals using whole-genome sequencing. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:433–41.CrossRefPubMed Eyre DW, Fawley WN, Rajgopal A, et al. Comparison of control of Clostridium Difficile infection in six English hospitals using whole-genome sequencing. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:433–41.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Jazmati N, Hellmich M, Ličanin B, Plum G, Kaasch AJPCR. Cycle threshold value predicts the course of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:e7–8.CrossRefPubMed Jazmati N, Hellmich M, Ličanin B, Plum G, Kaasch AJPCR. Cycle threshold value predicts the course of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:e7–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Senchyna F, Gaur RL, Gombar S, Truong CY, Schroeder LF, Banael N. Clostridium Difficile PCR cycle threshold predicts free toxin. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2651–60.CrossRefPubMed Senchyna F, Gaur RL, Gombar S, Truong CY, Schroeder LF, Banael N. Clostridium Difficile PCR cycle threshold predicts free toxin. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2651–60.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Rao K, Micic D, Natarajan M, et al. Clostridium difficile ribotype 027: relationship to age, detectability of toxins a or B in stool with rapid testing, severe infection, and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:233–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rao K, Micic D, Natarajan M, et al. Clostridium difficile ribotype 027: relationship to age, detectability of toxins a or B in stool with rapid testing, severe infection, and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:233–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Can a toxin gene NAAT be used to predict toxin EIA and the severity of Clostridium difficile infection?
Authors
Mark I. Garvey
Craig W. Bradley
Martyn A. C. Wilkinson
Elisabeth Holden
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2047-2994
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0283-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2017 Go to the issue