Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Dementia | Protocol

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review protocol

Authors: Wei Qi Koh, Simone Anna Felding, Elaine Toomey, Dympna Casey

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial health issues such as depression and social isolation are an important cause of morbidity and premature mortality for older adults and people with dementia. Social robots are promising technological innovations to deliver effective psychosocial interventions to promote psychosocial wellbeing. Studies have reported positive findings regarding this technology on the psychosocial health of older adults and people with dementia. However, despite positive findings of the effects of social robots for older adults and people with dementia, little is known about factors affecting their implementation in practice.

Methods

This study follows Arksey and O’Malley’s approach and methodological enhancement by Levac et al. Relevant articles will be identified by searching electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Compendex and PubMed. A two-phase screening process will be undertaken by two independent reviewers to determine articles’ inclusion. Findings will be summarised and reported thematically based on domains in the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) and presented narratively. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will guide the reporting of findings.

Discussion

Reporting the protocol in advance of conducting the review will ensure that rigorous and transparent methodological approach is undertaken. The outcomes of the review include identifying variants in terminologies used to describe implementation, identifying the scope of the literature regarding the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of social robots and identifying research gaps to guide further empirical research in this field. This evidence synthesis constitutes part of a bigger project aimed to develop implementation guidelines for social robotics for older adults with dementia. Since the methodological process consists of reviewing and collecting data from publicly available data, this study does not require approval from a research ethics board.

Scoping review registration

Our protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework (https://​osf.​io/​2x3y9/​) as an open access article, under the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC-4.0) license, which allows others to distribute, remix, adapt and build on this work on a non-commercial basis, and license their derivative work using different terms, on the basis that the original basis is properly cited and the use is non-commercial (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​4.​0/​).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. Social isolation and health, with an emphasis on underlying mechanisms. Perspect Biol Med. 2003;46(3):S39–52.CrossRef Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. Social isolation and health, with an emphasis on underlying mechanisms. Perspect Biol Med. 2003;46(3):S39–52.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Coyle CE, Dugan E. Social isolation, loneliness and health among older adults. J Aging Health. 2012;24(8):1346–63.CrossRef Coyle CE, Dugan E. Social isolation, loneliness and health among older adults. J Aging Health. 2012;24(8):1346–63.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moyle W, Kellett U, Ballantyne A, Gracia N. Dementia and loneliness: an Australian perspective. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(9-10):1445–53.CrossRef Moyle W, Kellett U, Ballantyne A, Gracia N. Dementia and loneliness: an Australian perspective. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(9-10):1445–53.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dröes R-M, Boelens-Van Der Knoop EC, Bos J, Meihuizen L, Ettema TP, Gerritsen DL, et al. Quality of life in dementia in perspective: an explorative study of variations in opinions among people with dementia and their professional caregivers, and in literature. Dementia. 2006;5(4):533–58.CrossRef Dröes R-M, Boelens-Van Der Knoop EC, Bos J, Meihuizen L, Ettema TP, Gerritsen DL, et al. Quality of life in dementia in perspective: an explorative study of variations in opinions among people with dementia and their professional caregivers, and in literature. Dementia. 2006;5(4):533–58.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Milne A. The ‘D’ word: Reflections on the relationship between stigma, discrimination and dementia. J Ment Health. 2010;19(3):227–33.CrossRef Milne A. The ‘D’ word: Reflections on the relationship between stigma, discrimination and dementia. J Ment Health. 2010;19(3):227–33.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Alexopoulos GS. Depression in the elderly. Lancet. 2005;365(9475):1961–70.CrossRef Alexopoulos GS. Depression in the elderly. Lancet. 2005;365(9475):1961–70.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Meiland F, Innes A, Mountain G, Robinson L, van der Roest H, García-Casal JA, et al. Technologies to support community-dwelling persons with dementia: a position paper on issues regarding development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(1):e1.CrossRef Meiland F, Innes A, Mountain G, Robinson L, van der Roest H, García-Casal JA, et al. Technologies to support community-dwelling persons with dementia: a position paper on issues regarding development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(1):e1.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dautenhahn K. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362(1480):679–704.CrossRef Dautenhahn K. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362(1480):679–704.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Góngora Alonso S, Hamrioui S, de la Torre DI, Motta Cruz E, López-Coronado M, Franco M. Social robots for people with aging and dementia: a systematic review of literature. Telemed J E-Health. 2019;25(7):533–40.CrossRef Góngora Alonso S, Hamrioui S, de la Torre DI, Motta Cruz E, López-Coronado M, Franco M. Social robots for people with aging and dementia: a systematic review of literature. Telemed J E-Health. 2019;25(7):533–40.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pu L, Moyle W, Jones C, Todorovic M. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist. 2018;59(1):e37–51.CrossRef Pu L, Moyle W, Jones C, Todorovic M. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist. 2018;59(1):e37–51.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hung L, Liu C, Woldum E, Au-Yeung A, Berndt A, Wallsworth C, et al. The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):232.CrossRef Hung L, Liu C, Woldum E, Au-Yeung A, Berndt A, Wallsworth C, et al. The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):232.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nutbeam D, Bauman A. Evaluation in a nutshell: a practical guide to the evaluation of health promotion programs. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 2013. Nutbeam D, Bauman A. Evaluation in a nutshell: a practical guide to the evaluation of health promotion programs. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 2013.
13.
go back to reference Bauer MS, Williford WO, Dawson EE, Akiskal HS, Altshuler L, Fye C, et al. Principles of effectiveness trials and their implementation in VA Cooperative Study# 430: ‘Reducing the efficacy-effectiveness gap in bipolar disorder’. J Affect Disord. 2001;67(1-3):61–78.CrossRef Bauer MS, Williford WO, Dawson EE, Akiskal HS, Altshuler L, Fye C, et al. Principles of effectiveness trials and their implementation in VA Cooperative Study# 430: ‘Reducing the efficacy-effectiveness gap in bipolar disorder’. J Affect Disord. 2001;67(1-3):61–78.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3(1):32.CrossRef Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3(1):32.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Papadopoulos I, Koulouglioti C, Lazzarino R, Ali S. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(1):e033096.CrossRef Papadopoulos I, Koulouglioti C, Lazzarino R, Ali S. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(1):e033096.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.CrossRef Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.CrossRef Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.CrossRef Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2015;11(1):72.CrossRef Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2015;11(1):72.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.CrossRef Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–4.CrossRef Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pimental S. Acquiring evidence—tips for effective literature searching. Perm J. 2005;9(2):58.CrossRef Pimental S. Acquiring evidence—tips for effective literature searching. Perm J. 2005;9(2):58.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.CrossRef Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Drucker AM, Fleming P, Chan A-W. Research techniques made simple: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(11):e109–e14.CrossRef Drucker AM, Fleming P, Chan A-W. Research techniques made simple: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(11):e109–e14.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L, Bryman A, Burgess RG. Analysing qualitative data; 1994. Ritchie J, Spencer L, Bryman A, Burgess RG. Analysing qualitative data; 1994.
27.
go back to reference Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRef Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Weir NM, Newham R, Dunlop E, Bennie M. Factors influencing national implementation of innovations within community pharmacy: a systematic review applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):21.CrossRef Weir NM, Newham R, Dunlop E, Bennie M. Factors influencing national implementation of innovations within community pharmacy: a systematic review applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):21.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J of Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J of Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version; 2006. p. b92. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version; 2006. p. b92.
31.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.CrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review protocol
Authors
Wei Qi Koh
Simone Anna Felding
Elaine Toomey
Dympna Casey
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Dementia
Dementia
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01598-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue