Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Letter

Single screen of citations with excluded terms: an approach to citation screening in systematic reviews

Author: Brittany U. Carter

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Citation screening during the systematic review process can be time-consuming due to the exponentially increasing amount of research. This letter describes an approach to expediting the process by single screening citations that include terms in the abstract and/or keywords related to the exclusion criteria of the systematic review to quickly reject studies with a high likelihood of being excluded from the systematic review. This method can potentially improve the efficiency of the citation screening process while maintaining the quality of the systematic review; however, future research is needed to further validate this approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. West Sussex: Wiley; 2008. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. West Sussex: Wiley; 2008.
2.
3.
go back to reference Mallett S, Clarke M. The typical Cochrane review. How many trials? How many participants? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(4):820–3.CrossRefPubMed Mallett S, Clarke M. The typical Cochrane review. How many trials? How many participants? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(4):820–3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1635–40.CrossRefPubMed Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1635–40.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hempel S, Shetty KD, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LV, Danz MS, Johnsen B, Dalal SR. Machine learning methods in systematic reviews: identifying quality improvement intervention evaluations. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. Hempel S, Shetty KD, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LV, Danz MS, Johnsen B, Dalal SR. Machine learning methods in systematic reviews: identifying quality improvement intervention evaluations. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Mateen FJ, Oh J, Tergas AI, Bhayani NH, Kamdar BB. Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviews. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:89–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mateen FJ, Oh J, Tergas AI, Bhayani NH, Kamdar BB. Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviews. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:89–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Ng L, Pitt V, Huckvale K, Clavisi O, Turner T, Gruen R, Elliott JH. Title and Abstract Screening and Evaluation in Systematic Reviews (TASER): a pilot randomised controlled trial of title and abstract screening by medical students. Syst Rev. 2014;3:121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ng L, Pitt V, Huckvale K, Clavisi O, Turner T, Gruen R, Elliott JH. Title and Abstract Screening and Evaluation in Systematic Reviews (TASER): a pilot randomised controlled trial of title and abstract screening by medical students. Syst Rev. 2014;3:121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Rathbone J, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers. Syst Rev. 2015;4:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rathbone J, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers. Syst Rev. 2015;4:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Brodley C, Schmid CH. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Brodley C, Schmid CH. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Lin JS, Evans CV, Johnson E, Redmond N, Burda BU, Coppola EL, Smith N. Nontraditonal risk factors in cardiovascular disease risk assessment: a systematic evidence report for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018. Lin JS, Evans CV, Johnson E, Redmond N, Burda BU, Coppola EL, Smith N. Nontraditonal risk factors in cardiovascular disease risk assessment: a systematic evidence report for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018.
Metadata
Title
Single screen of citations with excluded terms: an approach to citation screening in systematic reviews
Author
Brittany U. Carter
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0782-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Go to the issue