Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Protocol

Structured approaches to promote patient and family engagement in treatment in acute care hospital settings: protocol for a systematic scoping review

Authors: Donna Goodridge, Chrysanthus Henry, Erin Watson, Meghan McDonald, Lucia New, Elizabeth L. Harrison, Murray Scharf, Erika Penz, Steve Campbell, Thomas Rotter

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While effective engagement of patients and families in treatment is increasingly viewed as a priority for many healthcare systems, much remains to be learned about the nature and outcomes of approaches that seek to accomplish this goal in the acute care hospital setting. Wide variability in the implementation of practices designed to promote patient and family engagement in hospitals has been noted. Approaches aimed at promoting patient and family engagement in treatment share the over-arching goal of changing behaviors of patients, families, and healthcare providers and possibly administrators. Behavior change techniques (BCTs) can be a key element of patient and family engagement approaches. This scoping review will contribute to the development of an evidence base detailing that the BCTs have potential to be effective in patient and family engagement interventions. The specific objectives of this review are to (a) identify and classify approaches used in acute care hospitals to engage patient and families in treatment according to the behavior change technique taxonomy; and (b) evaluate and synthesize the outcomes for these approaches for patients and families, healthcare providers, and health administrators/funders.

Methods

This systematic scoping review will allow us to determine the extent, range, and nature of research activity related to initiatives designed to promote patient and family engagement in care. A comprehensive electronic literature search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Studies will be included if they report on outcomes of a structured or systematic approach to the promotion of adult inpatient and family engagement in treatment in acute care settings. Studies will be selected in a two-stage screening process (title and abstract; full text) and quality will be assessed using the mixed methods assessment tool. Data extraction will include narrative descriptions of the intervention and classification of the behavior change techniques employed.

Discussion

This review aims to identify and classify the specific behavior change techniques underpinning patient and family engagement interventions used in acute care hospital settings. By identifying the “active ingredients” in these interventions, our findings will be transferable to a wide range of acute care hospital contexts and populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fullop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of care. BMJ. 2002;325:1263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fullop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of care. BMJ. 2002;325:1263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Herrin J, Harris KG, Kenward K, Hines S, Joshi MS, Frosch DL. Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospitals. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;0:1–8. Herrin J, Harris KG, Kenward K, Hines S, Joshi MS, Frosch DL. Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospitals. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;0:1–8.
6.
go back to reference Bear RA, Stockie S. Patient engagement and patient-centred care in the management of advanced chronic kidney disease and kidney failure. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2014;1:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bear RA, Stockie S. Patient engagement and patient-centred care in the management of advanced chronic kidney disease and kidney failure. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2014;1:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31.CrossRef Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Frankel A, Haraden C, Federico F, Lenoci-Edwards J. A framework for safe, reliable, and effective care. White paper. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement and Safe & Reliable Healthcare; 2017. Frankel A, Haraden C, Federico F, Lenoci-Edwards J. A framework for safe, reliable, and effective care. White paper. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement and Safe & Reliable Healthcare; 2017.
11.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Lemieux-Charles I, Brown AD, Sullivan T, Goel V. Barriers to health services planning and evaluation: an exploratory study. Pat Educ Coun. 2008;70(2):234–41.CrossRef Gagliardi AR, Lemieux-Charles I, Brown AD, Sullivan T, Goel V. Barriers to health services planning and evaluation: an exploratory study. Pat Educ Coun. 2008;70(2):234–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tritter J. Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expect. 2009;12:275–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tritter J. Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expect. 2009;12:275–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Weingart SN, Zhu J, Chiapetta L, et al. Hospitalized patient participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:269–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weingart SN, Zhu J, Chiapetta L, et al. Hospitalized patient participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:269–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stock R, et al. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self management behaviors? Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1443–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stock R, et al. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self management behaviors? Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1443–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard, et al. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30:21–9.CrossRefPubMed Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard, et al. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30:21–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centred care is associated with decreased health care utilization. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24:229–39.CrossRefPubMed Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centred care is associated with decreased health care utilization. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24:229–39.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Charmel P, Frampton S. Building the business case for patient-centred care. Healthc Financ Manage. 2008;62:80–5.PubMed Charmel P, Frampton S. Building the business case for patient-centred care. Healthc Financ Manage. 2008;62:80–5.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Aronson PL, Yau J, Helfaer MA, et al. Impact of family presence during pediatric intensive care rounds on the family and medical team. Pediatrics. 2009;24:1119–25.CrossRef Aronson PL, Yau J, Helfaer MA, et al. Impact of family presence during pediatric intensive care rounds on the family and medical team. Pediatrics. 2009;24:1119–25.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Balik B, Conway J, Zipperer L, Watson J. Achieving an exceptional patients and family experience of inpatient hospital care. IHI innovation series white paper. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2011. Elements of hospital-based patient- and family-centred care Balik B, Conway J, Zipperer L, Watson J. Achieving an exceptional patients and family experience of inpatient hospital care. IHI innovation series white paper. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2011. Elements of hospital-based patient- and family-centred care
22.
go back to reference Gausvik C, Lautar A, Miller L, et al. Structured nursing communication on interdisciplinary acute care teams improves perceptions of safety, efficiency, understanding of care plans and team work as well as job satisfaction. J Multidisc Healthc. 2015;8:337. Gausvik C, Lautar A, Miller L, et al. Structured nursing communication on interdisciplinary acute care teams improves perceptions of safety, efficiency, understanding of care plans and team work as well as job satisfaction. J Multidisc Healthc. 2015;8:337.
23.
go back to reference Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. London: MRC Population Health Science Research Network; 2014. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. London: MRC Population Health Science Research Network; 2014.
24.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, MacIntyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Craig P, Dieppe P, MacIntyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–92.CrossRefPubMed Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–92.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349(jan02 1):g7647.CrossRef Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349(jan02 1):g7647.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wranik WD, Hayden JA, Price S, Parker RMN, Haydt S, Edwards J, et al. How best to structure interdisciplinary primary care teams: the study protocol for a systematic review with narrative framework synthesis. Syst Rev. 2016;5:170.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wranik WD, Hayden JA, Price S, Parker RMN, Haydt S, Edwards J, et al. How best to structure interdisciplinary primary care teams: the study protocol for a systematic review with narrative framework synthesis. Syst Rev. 2016;5:170.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at http:www.covidence.org. Accessed 12 Feb 2018. Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at http:www.​covidence.​org. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
30.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:j3453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:j3453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Pluye P. Mixed kinds of evidence: synthesis designs and critical appraisal for systematic mixed studies reviews including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. Evid Based Med. 2015;20(2):79–2014. 110158. Epub 2015 Jan 29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pluye P. Mixed kinds of evidence: synthesis designs and critical appraisal for systematic mixed studies reviews including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. Evid Based Med. 2015;20(2):79–2014. 110158. Epub 2015 Jan 29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
34.
go back to reference McDaid S. An equality of condition framework for user involvement in mental health policy and planning: evidence from participatory action research. Disab Soc. 2009;24:461–74.CrossRef McDaid S. An equality of condition framework for user involvement in mental health policy and planning: evidence from participatory action research. Disab Soc. 2009;24:461–74.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Goodridge D, Isinger T, Rotter T. Patient family advisors’ perspectives on engagement in health-care quality improvement initiatives: power and partnership. Health Exp. 2017;21:379–86.CrossRef Goodridge D, Isinger T, Rotter T. Patient family advisors’ perspectives on engagement in health-care quality improvement initiatives: power and partnership. Health Exp. 2017;21:379–86.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Structured approaches to promote patient and family engagement in treatment in acute care hospital settings: protocol for a systematic scoping review
Authors
Donna Goodridge
Chrysanthus Henry
Erin Watson
Meghan McDonald
Lucia New
Elizabeth L. Harrison
Murray Scharf
Erika Penz
Steve Campbell
Thomas Rotter
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0694-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Go to the issue