Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

Authors: S. Ronzi, L. Orton, D. Pope, N. K. Valtorta, N. G. Bruce

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many interventions have been developed to promote respect and social inclusion among older people, but the evidence on their impacts on health has not been synthesised. This systematic review aims to appraise the state of the evidence across the quantitative and qualitative literature.

Methods

Eligible studies published between 1990 and 2015 were identified by scanning seven bibliographic databases using a pre-piloted strategy, searching grey literature and contacting experts. Studies were included if they assessed the impact (quantitatively) and/or perceived impact (qualitatively) of an intervention promoting respect and social inclusion on the physical or mental health of community-residing people aged 60 years and older. Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility by one reviewer. A second reviewer independently screened a 10% random sample. Full texts were screened for eligibility by one reviewer, with verification by another reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using standardised tools. Findings were summarised using narrative synthesis, harvest plots and logic models to depict the potential pathways to health outcomes.

Results

Of the 27,354 records retrieved, 40 studies (23 quantitative, 6 qualitative, 11 mixed methods) were included. All studies were conducted in high and upper middle-income countries. Interventions involved mentoring, intergenerational and multi-activity programmes, dancing, music and singing, art and culture and information-communication technology. Most studies (n = 24) were at high or moderate risk of bias. Music and singing, intergenerational interventions, art and culture and multi-activity interventions were associated with an overall positive impact on health outcomes. This included depression (n = 3), wellbeing (n = 3), subjective health (n = 2), quality of life (n = 2), perceived stress and mental health (n = 2) and physical health (n = 2). Qualitative studies offered explanations for mediating factors (e.g. improved self-esteem) that may lead to improved health outcomes and contributed to the assessment of causation.

Conclusions

Whilst this review suggests that some interventions may positively impact on the health outcomes of older people, and identified mediating factors to health outcomes, the evidence is based on studies with heterogeneous methodologies. Many of the interventions were delivered as projects to selected groups, raising important questions about the feasibility of wider implementation and the potential for population-wide benefits.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO registration number CRD42014010107
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World population, ageing. New York; 2015. doi:ST/ESA/SER.A/390 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World population, ageing. New York; 2015. doi:ST/ESA/SER.A/390
3.
go back to reference Rechel B, Grundy E, Robine J. Ageing in the European Union. Lancet. 2013;6736:1–11. Rechel B, Grundy E, Robine J. Ageing in the European Union. Lancet. 2013;6736:1–11.
8.
go back to reference Buffel T. Researchineg age-friendly communities researching age-friendly communities stories from older people as co-investigators. 1st ed. Manchester: The University of Manchester Library; 2015. Buffel T. Researchineg age-friendly communities researching age-friendly communities stories from older people as co-investigators. 1st ed. Manchester: The University of Manchester Library; 2015.
9.
go back to reference Mahmood A, Keating N. Towards inclusive built environments for older adults. In: Scharf T, Keating N, editors. From exclusion to Incl. old age: Policy; 2012. Mahmood A, Keating N. Towards inclusive built environments for older adults. In: Scharf T, Keating N, editors. From exclusion to Incl. old age: Policy; 2012.
13.
go back to reference Doran P, Buffel T. Translating research into action. Manchester; 2017. Doran P, Buffel T. Translating research into action. Manchester; 2017.
15.
go back to reference Scharlach AE. Age-friendly cities: for whom? By whom? For what purpose? In: Moulaert T, Garon S, editors. Age-friendly cities communities int. comp.: Springer; 2016. p. 305–29. Scharlach AE. Age-friendly cities: for whom? By whom? For what purpose? In: Moulaert T, Garon S, editors. Age-friendly cities communities int. comp.: Springer; 2016. p. 305–29.
16.
go back to reference Ogg J, Renaut S. Social inclusion of elders in familiese. In: Scharf T, Keating NC, editors. From exclusion to Incl. old age. In: Policy; 2012. Ogg J, Renaut S. Social inclusion of elders in familiese. In: Scharf T, Keating NC, editors. From exclusion to Incl. old age. In: Policy; 2012.
24.
go back to reference Eriksson M, Bauer GF, Pelikan JM. The handbook of salutogenesis: Springer International; 2016. Eriksson M, Bauer GF, Pelikan JM. The handbook of salutogenesis: Springer International; 2016.
30.
go back to reference Australian Public Service. Tackling wicked problems—a public policy perspective. Camberra; 2007. Australian Public Service. Tackling wicked problems—a public policy perspective. Camberra; 2007.
31.
go back to reference Ogilvie D, Cummins S, Petticrew M. Assessing the evaluability of complex public health interventions: five questions for researchers, funders, and policymakers. The Milbank Quartelry. 2011;89:206–25.CrossRef Ogilvie D, Cummins S, Petticrew M. Assessing the evaluability of complex public health interventions: five questions for researchers, funders, and policymakers. The Milbank Quartelry. 2011;89:206–25.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pawson R, Walshe K, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis: an introduction 2004. (ESRC Research Methods Programme RMP Me). London: ESRC Working Paper Series. Pawson R, Walshe K, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis: an introduction 2004. (ESRC Research Methods Programme RMP Me). London: ESRC Working Paper Series.
40.
go back to reference Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. vol. 10. York: University of York; 2009. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. vol. 10. York: University of York; 2009.
54.
go back to reference Phillipson C, White S. Faheem Aftab. Old Moat: age-friendly neighbourhood report. Manchester; 2013. Phillipson C, White S. Faheem Aftab. Old Moat: age-friendly neighbourhood report. Manchester; 2013.
55.
go back to reference Phillipson C. Developing age-friendly cities: policy challenges & options. 2012. Phillipson C. Developing age-friendly cities: policy challenges & options. 2012.
59.
go back to reference Atkins C, Sampson J. Critical appraisal guidelines for single case study research. Ecis. 2002:100–9. Atkins C, Sampson J. Critical appraisal guidelines for single case study research. Ecis. 2002:100–9.
60.
go back to reference Pope D. Liverpool quality assessment tools 2014. Oral Communication. Pope D. Liverpool quality assessment tools 2014. Oral Communication.
64.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews—a product from the ESRC methods programme. 2006. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews—a product from the ESRC methods programme. 2006.
65.
go back to reference Ellis SW. The Beth Johnson Foundation generations in action: final evaluation report (2004). 2004. Ellis SW. The Beth Johnson Foundation generations in action: final evaluation report (2004). 2004.
66.
go back to reference Cohen G, Perlstein S. The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. Gerontologist. 2006;46:726–34.PubMedCrossRef Cohen G, Perlstein S. The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. Gerontologist. 2006;46:726–34.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Slegers K, van Boxtel M, Jolles J. Effects of computer training and internet usage on the well-being and quality of life of older adults: a randomized, controlled study. 879 Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008;63:176–84.CrossRef Slegers K, van Boxtel M, Jolles J. Effects of computer training and internet usage on the well-being and quality of life of older adults: a randomized, controlled study. 879 Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008;63:176–84.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Ruffing-Rahal MA. Evaluation of group health promotion with community-dwelling older women. Public Health Nurs. 1994;11:38–48.PubMedCrossRef Ruffing-Rahal MA. Evaluation of group health promotion with community-dwelling older women. Public Health Nurs. 1994;11:38–48.PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Ellis SW. Changing the lives of children and older people: intergenerational mentoring in secondary schools. 2003. Beth Johnson Foundation and Manchester: Metropolitan University. Ellis SW. Changing the lives of children and older people: intergenerational mentoring in secondary schools. 2003. Beth Johnson Foundation and Manchester: Metropolitan University.
86.
go back to reference De Souza EM. Intergenerational interaction in health promotion: a qualitative study in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:463–9.PubMedCrossRef De Souza EM. Intergenerational interaction in health promotion: a qualitative study in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:463–9.PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference Newman S, Karip E, Faux RB. Everyday memory function of older adults: the impact of intergenerational school volunteer programs. J Educ Gerontol. 1995;21 Newman S, Karip E, Faux RB. Everyday memory function of older adults: the impact of intergenerational school volunteer programs. J Educ Gerontol. 1995;21
113.
go back to reference Medical Advisory Secretariat. Dwelling seniors: an evidence based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8 Medical Advisory Secretariat. Dwelling seniors: an evidence based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8
121.
go back to reference Clift S, Hancox G, Staricoff R, Christine W. Siging and health: a systematic mapping and review of non-clinical research. Sydney; 2008. Clift S, Hancox G, Staricoff R, Christine W. Siging and health: a systematic mapping and review of non-clinical research. Sydney; 2008.
122.
go back to reference Keogh JWL, Kilding A, Pidgeon P, Ashley L, Gillis D. Physical benefits of dancing for healthy older adults: a review. J Aging Phys Act. 2009;17:479–500.PubMedCrossRef Keogh JWL, Kilding A, Pidgeon P, Ashley L, Gillis D. Physical benefits of dancing for healthy older adults: a review. J Aging Phys Act. 2009;17:479–500.PubMedCrossRef
124.
go back to reference Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350:326–9.PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350:326–9.PubMedCrossRef
129.
go back to reference Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. Concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health: levelling up. Part 1. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2007. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. Concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health: levelling up. Part 1. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2007.
135.
Metadata
Title
What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
Authors
S. Ronzi
L. Orton
D. Pope
N. K. Valtorta
N. G. Bruce
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Go to the issue