Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Commentary

Challenges and opportunities in country-specific research synthesis: a case study from Cameroon

Authors: Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Lynn Cockburn

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Research synthesis is an important approach to summarizing a body of literature. Usually, the goal is to determine the effectiveness of an intervention, to determine the strength of association between two factors, to determine the prevalence of a condition, or to scope the literature. Research synthesis methods can also be used to appraise the quantity and quality of research output from institutions or countries. In the latter case, standard quantitative systematic review methodologies would not apply and investigators must borrow strategies from qualitative syntheses and bibliometric analyses to develop a complete and meaningful appraisal of the literature from a given country.

Methods

In this paper, we use the example of Cameroon to highlight some of the challenges and opportunities of appraising a body of country-specific literature. A comprehensive and exhaustive search of the literature was conducted to identify health-related literature from Cameroon published from 2005 to 2014. Titles were screened in duplicate.

Results

A total of 8624 studies were retrieved of which 721 were retained. The main challenges were making a choice of synthesis approach; selecting the right databases, data storage and management; and sustaining the team. Key opportunities include enhanced networking, a detailed appraisal of funding sources, international collaborations, language of publication, and issues with study design. The product is a comprehensive and informative body of evidence that can be used to inform policy with regards to international collaboration, location of research studies, language of publication, knowledge areas of focus, and gaps.

Conclusion

Knowledge synthesis approaches can be adapted for appraisal of country-specific research and offer opportunities for in-depth appraisal of research output.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hedges LV, Cooper H. Research synthesis as a scientific process. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2009;1 Hedges LV, Cooper H. Research synthesis as a scientific process. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2009;1
2.
go back to reference Norman I, Griffiths P. The rise and rise of the systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed Norman I, Griffiths P. The rise and rise of the systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, Levac D, Ng C, Sharpe JP, Wilson K, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, Levac D, Ng C, Sharpe JP, Wilson K, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference De Bellis N: Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to Cybermetrics: scarecrow press; 2009. De Bellis N: Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to Cybermetrics: scarecrow press; 2009.
5.
go back to reference Thabane L, Thomas T, Ye C, Paul J. Posing the research question: not so simple. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56(1):71–9.CrossRefPubMed Thabane L, Thomas T, Ye C, Paul J. Posing the research question: not so simple. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56(1):71–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Publique MdlS: Strategie Sectorielle de Sante 2001–2015. In.; 2009. Publique MdlS: Strategie Sectorielle de Sante 2001–2015. In.; 2009.
7.
go back to reference Enquete Demographique de Santé. Cameroun. 2004. In. Edited by Institut National de la Statistique Ministère de la Planification dlPdDedlAdT-YC. Maryland, USA: ORC Macro-Calverton; 2005. Enquete Demographique de Santé. Cameroun. 2004. In. Edited by Institut National de la Statistique Ministère de la Planification dlPdDedlAdT-YC. Maryland, USA: ORC Macro-Calverton; 2005.
9.
go back to reference Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–20.CrossRefPubMed Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–20.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ray M, Lorena W, Mbuagbaw L, Cockburn L. Functioning and disability in recent research from Cameroon: a narrative synthesis. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;27:73.CrossRef Ray M, Lorena W, Mbuagbaw L, Cockburn L. Functioning and disability in recent research from Cameroon: a narrative synthesis. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;27:73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Challenges and opportunities in country-specific research synthesis: a case study from Cameroon
Authors
Lawrence Mbuagbaw
Lynn Cockburn
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0552-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue