Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Impact of body size, nutrition and socioeconomic position in early life on the epigenome: a systematic review protocol

Authors: Jane Maddock, Wahyu Wulaningsih, Rebecca Hardy

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Body size, nutrition and socioeconomic position (SEP) in early life have been associated with a range of later life health outcomes. Epigenetic regulation is one mechanism through which these early life factors may impact later life health. The aim of this review protocol is to outline procedures to document the influence of body size, nutrition and SEP in early life on the epigenome.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase and BIOSIS will be systematically searched using pre-defined keywords. Additional studies will be identified through manual searching of reference lists. Two independent researchers will assess the eligibility and quality of each study, with disagreements being resolved through discussion or a third reviewer. Studies will be included if they have epigenetic markers measured either at the same time as, or after, the early life exposure and, have a measure of body size, nutrition or SEP in early life (up to 12 years), are in the English language and are from a sample of community-dwelling participants.

Discussion

This protocol will be used to collate the evidence for the effect of early life factors on the epigenome. Findings will form a component of a wider research study examining epigenetic responses to exposures in early life and over the life course and its impact on healthy ageing using data from population-based cohort studies.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016050193
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:285–93.CrossRefPubMed Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:285–93.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:61–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:61–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Kuh D, Cooper R, Hardy R, Richards M, Ben-Schlomo Y. A life course approach to healthy ageing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Kuh D, Cooper R, Hardy R, Richards M, Ben-Schlomo Y. A life course approach to healthy ageing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
4.
go back to reference Lucas A, Fewtrell M, Cole T. Fetal origins of adult disease—the hypothesis revisited. Br Med J. 1999;319:245.CrossRef Lucas A, Fewtrell M, Cole T. Fetal origins of adult disease—the hypothesis revisited. Br Med J. 1999;319:245.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barker DJ. Maternal nutrition, fetal nutrition, and disease in later life. Nutrition. 1997;13:807–13.CrossRefPubMed Barker DJ. Maternal nutrition, fetal nutrition, and disease in later life. Nutrition. 1997;13:807–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lucas A. Long-term programming effects of early nutrition—implications for the preterm infant. J Perinatol. 2005;25:S2–6.CrossRefPubMed Lucas A. Long-term programming effects of early nutrition—implications for the preterm infant. J Perinatol. 2005;25:S2–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Galobardes B, Lynch JW, Smith GD. Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality in adulthood: systematic review and interpretation. Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:7–21.CrossRefPubMed Galobardes B, Lynch JW, Smith GD. Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality in adulthood: systematic review and interpretation. Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:7–21.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Galobardes B, Smith GD, Lynch JW. Systematic review of the influence of childhood socioeconomic circumstances on risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16:91–104.CrossRefPubMed Galobardes B, Smith GD, Lynch JW. Systematic review of the influence of childhood socioeconomic circumstances on risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16:91–104.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:329–47.CrossRefPubMed Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:329–47.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Power C, Hertzman C. Social and biological pathways linking early life and adult disease. Br Med Bull. 1997;53:210–21.CrossRefPubMed Power C, Hertzman C. Social and biological pathways linking early life and adult disease. Br Med Bull. 1997;53:210–21.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33:245–54.CrossRefPubMed Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33:245–54.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Feil R, Fraga MF. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:97–109.PubMed Feil R, Fraga MF. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:97–109.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Demetriou CA, van Veldhoven K, Relton C, Stringhini S, Kyriacou K, Vineis P. Biological embedding of early-life exposures and disease risk in humans: a role for DNA methylation. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45:303–32.CrossRefPubMed Demetriou CA, van Veldhoven K, Relton C, Stringhini S, Kyriacou K, Vineis P. Biological embedding of early-life exposures and disease risk in humans: a role for DNA methylation. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45:303–32.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. Ottawa: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000. Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. Ottawa: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000.
18.
go back to reference Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York; 2009. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York; 2009.
19.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S: Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version. Lancaster: Lancaster University; 2006;1:b92. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S: Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version. Lancaster: Lancaster University; 2006;1:b92.
20.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of body size, nutrition and socioeconomic position in early life on the epigenome: a systematic review protocol
Authors
Jane Maddock
Wahyu Wulaningsih
Rebecca Hardy
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0521-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue