Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Adherence to self-care behaviours and associated barriers in type 2 diabetes patients of low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

Authors: Victor Mogre, Natalie A. Johnson, Flora Tzelepis, Jonathan Shaw, Christine Paul

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Diabetes has become a global health emergency affecting high-, middle- and low-income countries. Previous systematic reviews have either focused on patients’ adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours only or barriers to diabetes care (including self-care) only in the published literature and have not also analysed data separately for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Thus, none have focused on adherence with, and barriers to, self-care behaviours from the perspectives of both patient and providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review will evaluate the published literature on adherence to five diabetes self-care behaviours (i.e., diet, exercise, self-monitoring of blood glucose, medication taking and foot care) and associated barriers in type 2 diabetes patients in LMICs. Healthcare providers’ barriers to the provision of diabetes self-care support will also be reviewed.

Methods

This narrative review will be reported in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The electronic databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and the British Nursing Index will be searched. Qualitative and quantitative studies reporting on type 2 diabetes patients’ adherence to self-care behaviours and associated barriers in LMICs will be included. Studies also reporting on barriers encountered by providers in LMICs providing diabetes care and supporting patients to adhere to self-care behaviours will also be included. Cross-sectional studies, observational cohort studies, baseline data of randomised controlled trials and qualitative studies will be eligible. Two independent reviewers will screen articles for inclusion, undertake quality assessment of included studies and execute data extraction using standardised forms. Discrepancies will be discussed to reach consensus, and another reviewer will adjudicate if the need arises. The Guidance of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews will be employed to explore relationships within and between included studies.

Discussion

This review will provide evidence on adherence to self-care behaviours by type 2 diabetes patients in LMICs. Barriers experienced by patients in LMICs to adhere to recommended self-care behaviours will also be identified. Barriers experienced by healthcare providers in LMICs in providing self-care support patients will also be determined.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016035406
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: WHO; 2016. WHO. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
2.
go back to reference International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2013. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2013.
3.
go back to reference Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.CrossRefPubMed Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
5.
go back to reference Levitt NS. Diabetes in Africa: epidemiology, management and healthcare challenges. Heart. 2008;94:1376–82.CrossRefPubMed Levitt NS. Diabetes in Africa: epidemiology, management and healthcare challenges. Heart. 2008;94:1376–82.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference International diabetes federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 7th Edition. Brussels, Belgium: IDF; 2015. International diabetes federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 7th Edition. Brussels, Belgium: IDF; 2015.
7.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:S37.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:S37.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference WHO. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: report of a WHO Consultation Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. 1999. WHO. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: report of a WHO Consultation Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. 1999.
9.
go back to reference Booth GL, Hux JE. Relationship between avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes mellitus and income level. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:101–6.CrossRefPubMed Booth GL, Hux JE. Relationship between avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes mellitus and income level. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:101–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bazargan M, Johnson KH, Stein JA. Emergency department utilization among Hispanic and African-American under-served patients with type 2 diabetes. Ethn Dis. 2003;13:369–75.PubMed Bazargan M, Johnson KH, Stein JA. Emergency department utilization among Hispanic and African-American under-served patients with type 2 diabetes. Ethn Dis. 2003;13:369–75.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1218–24.CrossRefPubMed Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1218–24.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;104:1.CrossRef International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;104:1.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:S14–80.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:S14–80.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (UK). Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). UK: Royal College of Physicians; 2008. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (UK). Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). UK: Royal College of Physicians; 2008.
15.
go back to reference Coyle ME, Francis K, Chapman Y. Self-management activities in diabetes care: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37:513–22.CrossRefPubMed Coyle ME, Francis K, Chapman Y. Self-management activities in diabetes care: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37:513–22.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pun SP, Coates V, Benzie IF. Barriers to the self‐care of type 2 diabetes from both patients’ and providers’ perspectives: literature review. J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn. 2009;1(1):4–19.CrossRef Pun SP, Coates V, Benzie IF. Barriers to the self‐care of type 2 diabetes from both patients’ and providers’ perspectives: literature review. J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn. 2009;1(1):4–19.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nam S, Chesla C, Stotts NA, Kroon L, Janson SL. Barriers to diabetes management: patient and provider factors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed Nam S, Chesla C, Stotts NA, Kroon L, Janson SL. Barriers to diabetes management: patient and provider factors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sohal T, Sohal P, King-Shier KM, Khan NA. Barriers and facilitators for type-2 diabetes management in South Asians: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sohal T, Sohal P, King-Shier KM, Khan NA. Barriers and facilitators for type-2 diabetes management in South Asians: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Wilkinson A, Whitehead L, Ritchie L. Factors influencing the ability to self-manage diabetes for adults living with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(1):111–22.CrossRefPubMed Wilkinson A, Whitehead L, Ritchie L. Factors influencing the ability to self-manage diabetes for adults living with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(1):111–22.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference King H, Rewers M. Global estimates for prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in adults. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:157–77.CrossRefPubMed King H, Rewers M. Global estimates for prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in adults. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:157–77.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:1.CrossRef Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:1.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Young MM, Stevens A, Porath-Waller A, Pirie T, Garritty C, Skidmore B, Turner L, Arratoon C, Haley N, Leslie K. Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the non-medical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2012;1:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Young MM, Stevens A, Porath-Waller A, Pirie T, Garritty C, Skidmore B, Turner L, Arratoon C, Haley N, Leslie K. Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the non-medical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2012;1:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jorgensen CM. Measuring adherence to evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in women. DNP Practice Inquiry Projects. 2015;Paper 28. Jorgensen CM. Measuring adherence to evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in women. DNP Practice Inquiry Projects. 2015;Paper 28.
27.
go back to reference National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutue. Development and use of study quality assessment tools. 2014. Retrieved from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/background. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutue. Development and use of study quality assessment tools. 2014. Retrieved from http://​www.​nhlbi.​nih.​gov/​health-pro/​guidelines/​in-develop/​cardiovascular-risk-reduction/​tools/​background.​
28.
go back to reference Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:341–51. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:341–51.
29.
go back to reference Attree P. Low‐income mothers, nutrition and health: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Matern Child Nutr. 2005;1:227–40.CrossRefPubMed Attree P. Low‐income mothers, nutrition and health: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Matern Child Nutr. 2005;1:227–40.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Sim J, Madden S. Illness experience in fibromyalgia syndrome: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:57–67.CrossRefPubMed Sim J, Madden S. Illness experience in fibromyalgia syndrome: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:57–67.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yu DS, Lee DT, Kwong AN, Thompson DR, Woo J. Living with chronic heart failure: a review of qualitative studies of older people. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:474–83.CrossRefPubMed Yu DS, Lee DT, Kwong AN, Thompson DR, Woo J. Living with chronic heart failure: a review of qualitative studies of older people. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:474–83.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Zeh P, Sandhu HK, Cannaby AM, Sturt JA. Cultural barriers impeding ethnic minority groups from accessing effective diabetes care services: a systematic review of observational studies. Divers Equal Health Care. 2014;11:9–33. Zeh P, Sandhu HK, Cannaby AM, Sturt JA. Cultural barriers impeding ethnic minority groups from accessing effective diabetes care services: a systematic review of observational studies. Divers Equal Health Care. 2014;11:9–33.
33.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version 2006, 1. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version 2006, 1.
34.
go back to reference Whitehead PJ, Drummond A, Walker MF, Parry RH. Interventions to reduce dependency in personal activities of daily living in community dwelling adults who use homecare services: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2013;2:49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Whitehead PJ, Drummond A, Walker MF, Parry RH. Interventions to reduce dependency in personal activities of daily living in community dwelling adults who use homecare services: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2013;2:49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Rodgers M, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Roberts H, Britten N, Popay J. Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation. 2009;15:49–73.CrossRef Rodgers M, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Roberts H, Britten N, Popay J. Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation. 2009;15:49–73.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Arai L, Britten N, Popay J, Roberts H, Petticrew M, Rodgers M, Sowden A. Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions. Evid Policy. 2007;3:361–83.CrossRef Arai L, Britten N, Popay J, Roberts H, Petticrew M, Rodgers M, Sowden A. Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions. Evid Policy. 2007;3:361–83.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Centre for Reviews and Dissemnination. CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009. Centre for Reviews and Dissemnination. CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009.
38.
go back to reference McDaid C, Trowman R, Golder S, Hawton K, Sowden A. Interventions for people bereaved through suicide: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193:438–43.CrossRefPubMed McDaid C, Trowman R, Golder S, Hawton K, Sowden A. Interventions for people bereaved through suicide: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193:438–43.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Adherence to self-care behaviours and associated barriers in type 2 diabetes patients of low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
Authors
Victor Mogre
Natalie A. Johnson
Flora Tzelepis
Jonathan Shaw
Christine Paul
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0436-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue